Let me see if I have this straight. Some lawyer reveals he tapes his conversations with his clients without their knowledge. He then cops a plea to a five-year sentence for a campaign violation offense, which many believe usually involves only a fine. It turns out his lawyer is Lanny Davis, a well-known, not to say notorious, Bill Clinton hack.
Why would a man, innocent or not, let himself be offered up as a sacrificial lamb like this? I'm starting to believe he should be more pitied than censured. And we are supposed to believe him? Really?
William S. Wood II