In the May 13 article “Worries cloud program for disabled at C of C,” your reporter described the complaints of two students’ parents. Two. And one of those students, you report, “loved the program and thrived in it.”
I don’t see the “cloud,” and it sounds like maybe three or four people have “worries” about the program.
Shouldn’t a Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper gather more evidence than a couple of unhappy parents before running a prominently placed article with such an alarming headline?