I’m confused when I see under The Post and Courier’s online banner “Winner of the Pulitzer Prize,” proudly displayed. I then see misleading article titles such as: “Sanford, Scott oppose spending bill providing flood relief for South Carolina.”

One would infer the two had opposed a bill specifically intended for flood relief, not a spending bill that just happens to have within it a microscopic measure appropriating funds for food relief.

I would suggest an esteemed Pulitzer Prize winning organization utilize better journalistic integrity.

Michael Meuli

Lohr Drive

Mount Pleasant