Exhcange Fort Meade Yoga

In this Nov. 1, 2018 photo, county resident Joe Jamison, currently in active duty with the Air Force, and Jen Vaughn of Laurel participate with certified Warriors At Ease teacher Lucy Lomax, not pictured, who leads the class for military, at the Yoga Center of Columbia, Md. (Karl Merton Ferron/The Baltimore Sun via AP)

It's that time of the year when a middle-aged person's fancy turns to treadmills and diets.

Scientific literature on excess weight and health is expanding along with global waistlines, and yet, it's hard to find a solid, coherent scientific explanation for why some people get fat and others don't, and why some overweight people get Type 2 diabetes and heart disease and others don't.

Here in the U.S., beliefs about fat follow a science-y sounding quasi-religious narrative: Our prehistoric ancestors had to scramble for food, and therefore evolved voracious appetites that we've inherited like original sin. Only self-control can save us, and the association between fat and disease goes without question; it is seen as punishment for the sins of gluttony and sloth.

This narrative acknowledges evolution, but it's not real evolutionary biology. Last week, however, a real evolutionary biologist published a sweeping picture of human fat and health in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Biologist Mary Jane West-Eberhard of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Costa Rica, has focused her work on understanding biological variation. Sometimes individuals with the same genes can show dramatic differences; a queen bee and her workers share the same genes but very different fates. A butterfly born at one time of year may live many times longer than those born in other seasons. Some fish can even change sex in response to changes in the environment.

She proposes that the same biological principle can explain why humans come in quite different shapes. Some people put on so-called visceral fat, surrounding vital organs, while others put on so-called subcutaneous fat on the limbs, hips and elsewhere. This makes a big difference in health because recent studies show it's the visceral fat that's associated with Type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

Because she's interested in the functions of things, she looked into visceral fat - also known as the omentum, a part of the immune system. It wraps around the vital organs and protects them from infection. But what's protective early in life can have a downside later.

Why then do some people get an expanding omentum and others get "curves" or whatever the latest fashion calls attractively placed subcutaneous fat? She cites other biologists pointing to sexual selection as the driving force in the human tendency to put fat deposits in places where they serve as ornaments.

Her analysis of the data suggests that where your fat goes depends on how well fed you were as a fetus. It's those who are most undernourished in utero -- approximated by low birth weight -- who are most likely to accumulate visceral fat in the abdomen. Underweight, badly nourished babies are more vulnerable to infection and benefit from the short-term strategy of laying down protective visceral fat. The pattern is set by epigenetics -- chemical changes surrounding the DNA that determine which genes become activated in which tissues.

Analyses like West-Eberhard's paper might change the way we see our fellow humans. What makes a person with gorgeous, enviable curves different from someone with an unhealthy-looking gut? It's not necessarily that one is more "out of shape" or less self-controlled. It's all part of the human story -- evolution, epigenetics and the eternal human quest for a better life.

Faye Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.