Bus Driver Shortage (copy)

School buses leave West Ashley High School on Feb. 13, 2019. Brad Nettles/Staff

For Joe Biden, being called to account for his positions on busing in the 1970s must feel like being called to account for his fashion decisions in that era. Yes, he might admit, he made some bad choices, but at the time, it was hard to make good ones.

Nearly half a century on, the controversy may seem a simple matter of choosing whether to support racial integration. But simple is one thing the issue was not.

Let me be clear: School segregation was a hideous blight and a grievous injustice. There were many people who opposed busing out of ugly motives, and its supporters had the best of intentions.

Biden may have been guilty of deferring and even pandering to white constituents. But any politician who lasts as long as he has in public life has to take some positions that are unsavory at the time and regrettable in hindsight.

The basic dilemma was that we had no good remedies for entrenched public school segregation. Mandatory busing was a defensible policy, not an unassailable one. It had flaws that made it unpopular among African Americans as well as white people.

I speak from experience. Growing up in Midland and Austin, Texas, I attended public schools that were all white, except for a few Hispanics, until I reached A.N. McCallum High School for 10th grade. It had some 2,000 students, only two or three of them black. But in 1971, the fall of my senior year, things changed in a big way. After years of litigation, a desegregation plan closed L.C. Anderson High School, which was virtually all African American, and bused its students to other schools. Overnight, McCallum was integrated.

Not everyone was happy about it. Black students resented losing their neighborhood school, being separated from their friends and being forced to endure bus rides. Some McCallum parents and students were hostile. When the first bus arrived, the Anderson kids were greeted by a group of white students brandishing chains and sticks and hurling insults, a ritual repeated each morning for a week or so. Cleo Moore, a senior classmate who was bused, recalled all this in conversations we’ve had. One day, the black students arrived to find that someone had chalked a racial slur on the street. That day, with emotions boiling over, a racial brawl erupted in the cafeteria.

Police arrived in force and remained on campus for days. A student human relations committee was formed (an African American, Stella Roland, and I were co-chairs), and the climate calmed. Moore, who was also on the committee, recalls the “riot” as the turning point: The bullying white kids found that their victims would fight back. “We learned to coexist in the same space,” she says.

The experience was invaluable for white people who had had almost no previous interaction with black peers. I learned things about our divergent experiences and perceptions that stayed with me. But was it a net benefit for the African American students? That’s not so clear.

Some white students transferred to private schools. Some families moved out of the Austin school district. The tiny nearby town of Round Rock grew from 2,811 people in 1970 to 12,740 in 1980.

Get a weekly recap of South Carolina opinion and analysis from The Post and Courier in your inbox on Monday evenings.


That was the practical flaw in busing to integrate schools: Many white people resisted, and they found ways to escape. Today, 75% of Austin’s residents are white but only 28% of public school enrollment is white.

Biden may be faulted for indulging the resistance of white constituents. But in our democracy, they had a vote, and perhaps a majority. Sen. Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential rival who called Biden out on the issue, can legitimately claim that being bused gave her a better education. But not all African Americans got the same benefit. In hindsight, supporters of racial equity might have done better with other remedies.

This is one of those issues that fit what the jurist Learned Hand wrote: “The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right.” Maybe Biden didn’t have the correct answers then. But the correct answers weren’t easy to identify then. They still aren’t.

Steve Chapman is a columnist with the Chicago Tribune.

We're improving out commenting experience.

We’ve temporarily removed comments from articles while we work on a new and better commenting experience. In the meantime, subscribers are encouraged to join the conversation at our Post and Courier Subscribers group on Facebook.