You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
top story

Judge dismisses DUI charge against Sen. Paul Campbell one day before trial was to begin

  • Updated

After earlier saying he didn't have the authority to dismiss charges before trial, a magistrate presiding over Sen. Paul Campbell's drunken driving case did exactly that Wednesday, tossing out the last remaining criminal count against the legislative ethics chairman.

Campbell, 71, was arrested on the charge of driving under the influence after a Nov. 4 traffic crash. He also was accused of giving false information to police after authorities said he lied about who was behind the wheel, but prosecutors quietly dropped that count before a hearing on the eve of a scheduled trial.

The Republican from Goose Creek asked for a blood examination after his arrest, but a trooper didn't help him get the independent testing, a requirement of state law. His lawyers argued the trooper's misstep denied him access to potentially favorable evidence.

Magistrate Elbert Duffie said he had not thoroughly weighed the possible harm to Campbell's due process rights when defense attorneys first asked for a dismissal during an earlier court hearing.

Assistant Solicitor Manuela Clayton, the Horry County prosecutor assigned to the case, did not offer a rebuttal in court. She said after the proceeding that "there was nothing" to advance the charges in light of the trooper's oversight.

The law requires judges to discard the results of a breath test when an arresting officer doesn't provide "affirmative assistance" to a DUI suspect seeking a blood test. In Campbell's case, the magistrate opted to do that last month instead of making the move he ultimately made Wednesday: throwing out the case altogether.

"Whether I agree or disagree with (the judge's ruling), I mean, it is what it is," Clayton said. "It was pretty cut and dry."

By late Wednesday, the charges against Campbell had been scrubbed from online court records.

The false information charge had already been labeled as problematic because it alleged that Campbell handed over a false identification after the crash, not that he lied to troopers about who had been driving. Campbell had given the trooper a valid driver's license, said his lead attorney, Andy Savage.

"They told the world that he was a liar and they told the world he was a drunk driver, neither of which is true," Savage said after the hearing. 

Troopers reported that a Mercedes-Benz SUV driven by Campbell, who is also CEO of the Charleston County Aviation Authority, rear-ended a Jeep on Interstate 26 near North Charleston. The other driver wasn't seriously injured but reported that she saw Campbell switch seats with his wife following the crash.

Campbell has insisted he was never behind the wheel.

Campbell's blood-alcohol content registered at 0.09 percent in a breath test. Campbell, skeptical of the result, asked for a blood analysis. But the trooper responded, "This is what we got."

Savage had asked Duffie to toss out the charges for various reasons, including the trooper's failure to help Campbell get the blood test. Duffie ruled in January that he didn't have the authority to make the ruling.

In a recent defense motion, which was the centerpiece of Wednesday's hearing, Savage asked the magistrate to reconsider nixing the DUI charge.

In court, Savage argued that the senator's right to exculpatory evidence was compromised because he didn't have sufficient means to seek other evidence that could be used in his defense.

Duffie agreed, ruling that Campbell did not have a "reasonable opportunity" to obtain such independent evidence. Though he heard Savage's due process argument during the past hearing, Duffie conceded that he had failed to consider it the first time around.

Reach Michael Majchrowicz at 843-607-1052. Follow him on Twitter @mjmajchrowicz.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News

Columbia Breaking News

Greenville Breaking News

Myrtle Beach Breaking News

Aiken Breaking News