Abrams hopping from one galaxy to another

Zachary Quinto (left) and Chris Pine in “Star Trek Into Darkness.”

A conversation with J.J. Abrams is more like a series of interruptions and distractions, punctuated by exchanges of dialogue.

The latest diversion to appear on his iPhone screen one recent evening as he unwound at the Santa Monica, Calif., offices of his Bad Robot production company, was a photograph sent by his producing partner, Bryan Burk, of two tip jars side by side on a coffee-shop counter: one labeled “Star Wars” and the other “Star Trek.”

Here, in a discussion about his ever-expanding film and television empire, Abrams, 46, the prolific director and producer, had to stop and laugh at this encapsulation of his world and a seemingly one-or-the-other decision he faces.

Life would be challenging enough for Abrams as he awaits the opening of “Star Trek Into Darkness,” the long-awaited sequel to his 2009 reboot of “Star Trek,” which Paramount will release May 17. An advanced screening will be held Wednesday at the Citadel Mall IMAX and at Cinebarre.

The arrival of Abrams’ first “Star Trek” film, which cast fresh-faced actors Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto in the roles of Kirk and Spock, did more than revitalize this dormant, decades-old space-adventure series. It vaulted Abrams, creator of television shows “Lost” and “Alias,” into the vanguard of directors who could run the summer movie spectacles that are the lifeblood of Hollywood studios.

Then, just as he was settling into his captain’s chair on the starship Enterprise, Abrams rocked the geek-culture universe with the announcement, after some feints and misdirection, that he will direct a seventh film in the “Star Wars” saga, planned for 2015.

It is an assignment Abrams, who grew up in Los Angeles obsessed with movies such as “Star Wars” and “Jaws” (not to mention “The Philadelphia Story” and “Ordinary People”), said he could not pass up. But no one in his camp, least of all Abrams himself, knows how this choice will affect the new “Star Trek” movie or a director who never met a vintage action franchise he could resist.

“There are, I’m sure, people who would say I’ve never been very good at anything,” Abrams said, speaking in a fast-slow-fast, start-stop-start delivery that mirrors his work habits.“But I’ve also never been very good at focusing on one thing. It just seems to be my M.O.”

In a somewhat softer tone, he added: “I know that we all have our capacity, and at a certain point, it’s going to be too much.”

When Abrams’ original “Star Trek” sold $385 million in tickets worldwide, it created the expectation that he would promptly reunite his creative team and get to work on a sequel, and this raised problems.

First was the question of whether Abrams and his collaborators, formerly outsiders who had to prove to audiences that they could take over “Star Trek,” now its established stewards, could surpass themselves in a second go-round.

“When you’re operating from a place of, ‘We trust you now,’ there’s much further to fall,” said Damon Lindelof, a writer and producer of “Star Trek Into Darkness” and a creator of “Lost.” “I always like operating from a place of lowered expectations.”

Narratively, Abrams’ “Star Trek” used a sly time-travel subplot to establish its young Starfleet officers without annihilating the 40 years of story lines that preceded the film. But it also destroyed Spock’s home planet of Vulcan, and this seemed to demand further consequences in the sequel.

“Into Darkness” delivers this retribution through a new nemesis played by Benedict Cumberbatch, the star of “Sherlock,” whose vendetta against Starfleet hints at a more complicated agenda behind his murderous acts.

“The reasons for terrorism in any situation are a little more complicated than someone just hating our freedom,” said Roberto Orci, who wrote “Star Trek” with Alex Kurtzman, and who both return on “Into Darkness.” “We wanted the villain to be equally nuanced, to the point where some might not even call him a villain.”

But in the years since the first film, gathering the “Star Trek” brain trust in the same room became an exponentially complicated task. Lindelof was finishing “Lost” and working on the science-fiction thriller “Prometheus”; Kurtzman and Orci were producing their own projects, including Kurtzman’s feature-directing debut, “People Like Us”; and Abrams was making his coming-of-age fantasy “Super 8.”

The uncertainty of whether Abrams would direct this sequel was perhaps the greatest challenge of all — in a positive way, his writers say. “Our collective goal,” Kurtzman said, “was to make it something he would want to do.”

This strategy seemed to win over Abrams, who spoke about “Into Darkness” as if it were a spiritual quest or lifesaving surgery. “Despite wanting to do other things,” he said, “suddenly I found myself feeling like, ‘I cannot not direct this movie. I cannot pass this up.’ ”