Arrests of S.C. sheriffs concern colleagues

Charleston County Sheriff Al Cannon is one of five sheriffs in the state to face criminal charges in the past three years.

COLUMBIA — Five of South Carolina’s 46 sheriffs have faced criminal charges in the past three years, and their colleagues have noticed.

Sheriffs across the state plan to meet in April in Columbia for additional training and talks about what they can do as powerful figures in their counties to stay on the right side of the law. “I don’t think it is an epidemic, but they want to get together because we don’t want to see any more get in trouble,” said Jeff Moore, executive director of the South Carolina Sheriffs Association.

It had been well over a decade since a sitting South Carolina sheriff had been indicted when Lee County Sheriff E.J. Melvin faced dozens of federal drug and racketeering charges in May 2010. Since then, four more sheriffs have faced state misdemeanor charges, three of them accused of misusing state inmate labor. The fourth, Charleston County Sheriff Al Cannon, was charged with third-degree assault and battery after admitting he slapped in the face a handcuffed man who led his deputies on a 120 mph chase in January 2012. The misdemeanor charge was eligible for pretrial intervention and he remains in office.

The death of another sheriff, Larry Williams in Orangeburg County, kept him from facing charges as his county sued his estate, saying he took more than $200,000 in public money and used it on personal expenses.

Newberry County Sheriff Lee Foster said he doesn’t tolerate criminal behavior, but when he read the indictments against his fellow sheriffs, some of what prosecutors included concerned him and got him asking questions.

Newberry County, like 31 other local governments in South Carolina, gets state inmates to work on maintenance and other tasks in exchange for feeding, housing and medical care. The governments sign a contract about what is expected and what isn’t. But Foster, who has been Newberry County’s chief law officer for 25 years, said the contract appears to have gray areas and contradictions.

“There’s no excuse for an inmate building a house for a sheriff — nothing you can do to justify that,” Foster said. “But I saw where a sheriff got in trouble for allowing one of these inmates a television. My other inmates at the jail have televisions. Do I get in trouble for giving him something other inmates have? I just want clarity so I don’t end up in trouble.”

The latest sheriff charged is Sam Parker in Chesterfield County. He was indicted Wednesday on six misdemeanor charges. Prosecutors said he allowed two hand-picked inmates to live in a dorm, have televisions and an iPad and spend holidays with his family.

Parker’s lawyer said the sheriff had no criminal intent. He said he ran his office with common sense and got tripped up in confusing regulations. “There may be policy violations and state regulations that were not followed to a T. But these policy violations didn’t include any criminal intent,” defense attorney Johnny Gasser said.

Parker also ran afoul of attitudes that changed, Gasser said. Rural sheriffs have long had close relationships with inmates who earned their trust.

Sheriffs also face plenty of political pressure as the most visible officials in their counties, and they have considerable power in South Carolina.

“I tell the new sheriffs, ‘Remember that you aren’t invisible,”’ Moore said. “And don’t think everybody likes you.”

Moore said the most recent sheriffs arrested in South Carolina were taken down by investigations started by angry foes. A romantic entanglement with his new wife led to complaints against Saluda County Sheriff Jason Booth. Abbeville County Sheriff Charles Goodwin’s probe started with an anonymous letter to the governor’s office. And authorities began looking into Parker after an inmate upset that he was sent back to a regular state prison turned on the man who prosecutors said once agreed to fly him to the coast to see his family and had him over for holiday dinners.

Blake Taylor, who oversees the Correction Department program that sends state inmates to local governments, promises to listen to any concerns sheriffs have. He points out that the sheriffs who got in trouble for how they used inmates also committed other acts. “I don’t know of anything we’ve done to tighten down or change the rules,” Taylor said.

We're improving out commenting experience.

We’ve temporarily removed comments from articles while we work on a new and better commenting experience. In the meantime, subscribers are encouraged to join the conversation at our Post and Courier Subscribers group on Facebook.