Condo owners awarded $7.7 million

Construction defects cited in lawsuit

By John McDermott
Saturday, May 21, 2011



Mark Teseniar was skeptical when his telephone rang in 2007. On the line were his tenants who had just moved into a Johns Island condominium that he and his wife, Nan, own at Twelve Oaks at Fenwick, off Maybank Highway.

"They complained pretty quickly of mold and air-quality issues," Teseniar said. "I really didn't believe it at first. This was a pretty new unit."

Just in case, he decided to have some experts check it out.

"They discovered issues," he said.

photo

File/Staff

Construction flaws at the Twelve Oaks at Fenwick condo development off Maybank Highway were not obvious from the outside.

Lawyers were called in. They, in turn, hired local architect Myles Glick, whose forensic analysis uncovered "a tremendous number of defects," Teseniar said Friday.

Those construction flaws mushroomed into a lawsuit that yielded a $7.7 million verdict last week against the company that installed the exterior stucco at Twelve Oaks at Fenwick.

"The jury gave us every nickel we asked for," said Jesse Kirchner, one of the attorneys representing the Teseniars and other property owners.

The award came on top of about $8 million that 16 other businesses previously agreed to pay to settle claims against them, Kirchner said.

The remaining defendant,

Professional Plastering & Stucco Inc. of Sanford, Fla., elected to take its chances in front of a local jury. It lost, and an appeal is likely.

The company's president, Donnie King, and its attorneys did not respond to requests for comment Friday.

The case was not limited to the condo owned by Teseniar, a local teacher who was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. The defects affected the entire 216-unit development, which was built within the past decade. Kirchner said the property includes a dozen residential buildings and a clubhouse.

"It was in pretty bad shape," he said.

The shoddily installed stucco allowed water to intrude behind walls, deteriorating trusses and other key wooden support structures, according the lawsuit.

Kirchner said residents began to notice water stains and mold building up on the interior walls. The damage was not obvious from the outside.

"If you looked at the buildings from the parking lot they really looked in good shape," he said. "It isn't until you peel back the skin of the buildings do you see the true nature of the problem."

He attributed the bulk of the defects to sloppy workmanship and lax supervision.

"It's really just an ... inattention to detail," Kirchner said

Professional Plastering & Stucco's trial started May 9 and wrapped on Friday the 13th. Mount Pleasant attorney Phillip W. Segui, who also represented the condo owners, said a turning point came when jurors were handed samples of rotted wood taken from the property.

"They were able to hold in Ziploc bags structural framing that looked as if it had turned to chewing tobacco," Segui said. "I think that got their attention."

Teseniar said owners will use the proceeds from the litigation to fix the damage. The repair bill is estimated at about $15 million.

"We've been through the wringer, but we're only halfway there," he said. "We still have to fix things."

Reach John McDermott at 937-5572.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links