Proposal on illegals is tabled

Summerville plan would have affected renters

By Dave Munday
The Post and Courier
Thursday, September 9, 2010



SUMMERVILLE -- Town Council tabled a controversial ordinance Wednesday night that requires employers and landlords to try harder to weed out illegal immigrants.

The ordinance, which had attracted national attention as one of the strictest in the country, would have required applicants to present a driver's license or other state-approved identification to get hired or rent a property. Some renters would have had to apply to the town for an occupancy permit.

Landlords called it an unworkable government intrusion into the town's 7,200 rental units. The town attorney warned that similar ordinances in other cities have been shelved because of lawsuits.

Previous coverage

Summerville considers illegal immigrant ban, published 07/13/10

Council tabled the ordinance and instead gave first-reading approval to another one that focuses only on employers, requiring them to check the immigration status of workers. Both the state and Dorchester County have recently passed similar employment laws, and the town's version generated no controversy.

The vote to table the ordinance that included renters was 4-3, with Mayor Berlin G. Myers casting the tie-breaking vote.

Arguments were passionate on both sides, from the audience as well as on council.

Roan Garcia-Quintana of Mauldin, executive director of Americans Have Had Enough!, spoke in favor of the ordinance.

"It's a very much needed ordinance," he said. "Illegal aliens are sucking the life of our country."

Jennifer Kuhns, who identified herself as a mother, spoke against it.

"This ordinance is a waste of time that will do nothing to benefit or reward our town," she said.

Ryan Castle, government affairs director for the Charleston Trident Association of Realtors, objected to the town stepping into the rental market.

"This is not about immigration," he said. "It's about government intrusion into the rental housing market."

Ron Turner defended the ordinance.

"I too am an American who has had enough," he said.

Bernie Mazyck, who is black and a lifelong resident, said the ordinance brought back bad memories.

"I stand here saddened by this attempt to separate us once again," he said. "You will set a tone of fear among true citizens that this town stands for moving the clock back."

S.C. Apartment Association President Victoria Cowart said the ordinance would cost the town millions in legal fees because it violates federal laws.

"This has already failed in the courts," she said.

Councilman Walter Bailey, an attorney and former 1st Circuit solicitor, previously said he modeled the ordinance after a similar one in Fremont, Neb. The Fremont ordinance was supposed to go into effect the last day of July but was put on hold after lawsuits from groups that called it discriminatory.

Judges also struck down similar measures in Hazleton, Pa., and Farmers Branch, Texas.

Summerville Town Councilman Mike Dawson made the motion to table the ordinance.

"I just cannot with good conscience risk potentially spending millions in taxpayer dollars just to make a point," he said.

Bailey disagreed.

"If we think this is the right thing to do, we should do it," Bailey said.

Councilman Ricky Waring said council should pass the ordinance and then consider rescinding it if the town gets sued.

"I think we've got to take a stand sometimes," Waring said. "We can undo any ordinance we can pass."

Councilman Aaron Brown said his black constituents are against the ordinance.

"There has never been one iota of proof that this ordinance is necessary," he said. "In my opinion, this total ordinance is a waste of our time and is going to be a blight on this town."

Brown also voted against the substitute ordinance aimed at employers, which passed first reading 5-1.

Reach Dave Munday at 937-5553 or dmunday@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links