Landfill developer withdraws project plan

By David Slade
The Post and Courier
Friday, September 3, 2010



Opponents of a proposed construction waste landfill in Adams Run were declaring victory Thursday, after developer Tre Sheppard withdrew the long-contested plan prior to a scheduled vote by a County Council committee.

"I think this is about as good a result as we could get," said Wilbur Jones, one of the most outspoken opponents of the landfill.

County officials said the withdrawal of the plan would have the same effect as if the County Council had voted against it. The developer was seeking zoning changes and changes to the county-wide land guidelines found in the Comprehensive Plan.

"If it has the same consequences as a vote, then it's a good thing," said Kate Parks with the Coastal Conservation League, which opposed the landfill.

Unlike several times last year when scheduled votes on the landfill zoning issue were postponed -- much to the frustration of opponents -- the withdrawal of the plan means that it is dead for now. The plan could be considered again only after a year has passed, and it would be treated as a new request that would have to go through the entire process again, county officials said.

Officials also said that they think the withdrawal means that any landfill proposed on the property would need to reapply for a state Department of Health and Environmental Control permit, but the county's attorney said he needed to confirm that that is correct.

Sheppard informed the county Thursday morning, in a one-sentence message, that he was withdrawing his zoning requests "until further notice."

His plan called for a 102-acre landfill for construction and demolition waste on a 313-acre property on U.S. Highway 17 near Parkers Ferry Road. The county owns 750 acres of land surrounding the site, which the county purchased from the Sheppard family for $1.5 million in 1992.

The county had considered using the land for a garbage landfill but abandoned that idea and has tried at least once to sell the property.

Opposition to the landfill was well-demonstrated at two public hearings last year, one of which attracted about 200 people. The county's Planning Commission voted 7-0 in early 2009 to recommended rejection of the zoning requests.

Previous coverage

Landfill back on front burner, published 08/20/10

In other business at the committee meetings Thursday, council members approved the following recommendations, which will have to be ratified during Tuesday's regular County Council meeting:

--Providing economic incentives -- a fixed property tax rate for 20 years and $3 million in reimbursed infrastructure costs -- to Remount Venture LLC of Mount Pleasant, which plans to add 182,000 square feet at a cost of $24 million to its 60-acre Remount Road Business Park in North Charleston. The incentives would require that the project create at least 600 jobs and support a payroll of at least $30 million.

--Naming the new county jail the J. Al Cannon, Jr. Detention Center, after the county's currently serving elected sheriff. Councilman Dickie Schweers questioned the propriety of naming a prominent building after an elected official who may seek re-election, and Schweers abstained from voting.

--Naming the council's meeting room the Beverly T. Craven Council Chambers, honoring the current and longtime clerk of council.

--Naming the county's election headquarters the John L. Chisolm Election Headquarters, honoring the civil rights leader known as "Big John" who had served on the county Election Commission and died in 2004. Chisolm played a notable role in integrating the Charleston County Fair, Charleston Municipal Golf Course and Edisto Beach State Park.

Reach David Slade at 937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links