Legislators reject rape, incest abortion ban

Associated Press
Originally published 07:55 a.m., March 17, 2010
Updated 09:35 a.m., March 17, 2010



COLUMBIA — South Carolina legislators Wednesday rejected plans to ban abortions in the state's health insurance plan in cases of rape or incest or when they're needed to protect a mother's health.

The late night debate and 57-54 vote came in the midst of discussion a $5 billion spending plan that left the House Ways and Means Committee last month with the abortion ban.

Democrats railed against it then and again Wednesday.

"This is a misguided attempt and a misguided effort to do what some believe is right," said state Rep. Bakari Sellers, a Denmark Democrat.

He said the Republicans pushing the measure couldn't understand the gravity of what they were doing. "When you are that person that is pinned down in the back alley and raped; when you are that person that is actually assaulted sexually by your father — this is not a time for us to play political games. This is not the time for me to say my God is better than yours. This is a time to do what is right," Sellers said.

State Rep. Greg Delleney, a Chester Republican, said the change would only affect people covered by the state health insurance plan and he'd offer a measure that would allow for abortions when a mother's health was threatened. But that's as far as he would go. "We live in a civilized society," Delleney said. "We do not kill children for what their fathers do."

That was little comfort to state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, who counsels women professionally.

"How dare you," said Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg. She said legislators were telling women, "forget what you want to do, we know better."

Republican Rep. Wendy Nanney of Greenville disagreed. "Women do not have a right to take that life," Nanney said. Pregnancies are "a life. It's a precious gift. Maybe we don't like how it was created and the circumstances in which it was created."

Democrat Rep. Lester Branham, a retired Lake City pastor, urged legislators to discern the difference between a gift and a crime. "That act of impregnating that girl against her will is not a gift of God. It's a crime. It's a crime against her and a crime against all humanity in my opinion," Branham said.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links