Hospital faces $67,000 in sanctions

By Robert Behre
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, July 7, 2010



CHARLESTON - Bon Secours-St. Francis Xavier Hospital has been slapped with more than $67,000 in sanctions after its attorneys tried to move a case from state court to federal court -- even though a federal judge previously rejected such a move.

Legal maneuvering is common before trials, but a judge can impose sanctions if he feels such jockeying needlessly wastes the court's time.

Circuit Judge J. Michael Baxley's order against the hospital was filed last week. It's the most recent step in a 6-year-old defamation lawsuit between the hospital and local physician Dr. Thomas Wieters, a case expected to go to trial soon.

Wieters' attorney, Gregg Meyers, said the sanctions are an unusual step. "I've never seen anything like it, but I've only been practicing law for 31 years," he said.

The order requires the hospital to pay $53,686 to cover a week's worth of lost appointments for Wieters as well as his extra legal expenses. It also requires the hospital to pay $13,863 to the state for court and juror costs.

"The conduct of the defendants and their counsel severely disrupted and inconvenienced the jury pool, the litigants, the witnesses, this court, the court staff, the clerk, the clerk's staff and the court administration's specialized multi-week docket," Baxley's order said.

A jury trial was set to begin in early March when Bon Secours-St. Francis' attorneys sought to move it to federal court. The hospital previously tried to get the federal courts to take the case in 2004, with no success.

While hospital attorneys felt they had different reasons behind their recent request, Meyers and Baxley disagreed.

"The court is aware that these are substantial sanctions, but believes they are commensurate with the ... defendant's conduct," Baxley's order said.

Tricia G. Crimminger, director of corporate communications for Roper-St. Francis Healthcare, said Tuesday that the hospital would not comment on the sanctions order because the case is still pending.

A jury trial in the case is set to begin later this month. At issue is information about Wieters that the hospital sent to the National Practitioners Databank. Wieters claims the information was false.

St. Francis likely won't have to decide whether to appeal the order until it has a verdict in the lawsuit, Meyers said.

Reach Robert Behre at rbehre@postandcourier.com or 937-5771.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links