TSA nominee withdraws

Obama choice cites politicized process

By JULIE PACE
Associated Press
Thursday, January 21, 2010



WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's choice to lead the Transportation Security Administration withdrew his name Wednesday, a setback for an administration still trying to explain how a man could attempt to blow up a commercial airliner on Christmas Day.

Erroll Southers said he was pulling out because his nomination had become a lightning rod for those with a political agenda.

Obama had tapped Southers, a top official with the Los Angeles Airport Police Department, to lead the TSA in September, but his confirmation has been blocked by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., who said he was worried that Southers would allow TSA employees to have collective bargaining rights.

On Wednesday, Southers said the confirmation process made him question his willingness to participate in public service.

"I am not a politician. I'm a counterrrorism expert. They took an apolitical person and politicized my career."

Southers said he couldn't give DeMint a definitive answer on the collective bargaining issue because it wasn't a yes or no question, and required access to information he wouldn't have had until he was confirmed.

DeMint said in a statement that "answering simple, direct questions about security and integrity" appeared to have been too much for Southers.

"TSA screeners can already join unions, but collective bargaining would force TSA officials to ask union bosses for permission to make critical security changes," DeMint said.

Questions also were raised about a reprimand Southers received for running background checks on his then-estranged wife's boyfriend 20 years ago. Southers, a former FBI agent, wrote a letter to lawmakers acknowledging that he had given inconsistent answers to Congress on the issue.

In an October affidavit, Southers said he asked a police employee to run a background check on his then-estranged wife's boyfriend, and was censured by his FBI superiors 20 years ago for what he said was an isolated instance.

But a day after the committee approved his nomination and sent it to the full Senate, he wrote to the senators and told them that he was incorrect, that he had twice run background checks himself.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links