Weather
Home
Story Index Census Civil War 150 Your Lowcountry AP Nation/World Offbeat Boeing Lottery Traffic Cam Obituaries
Local News
News Archive Bridge Run Politics Columnists Special Reports Report News Text Alerts
Watchdog
Restaurant Inspections Parking Violations Sex Offender Locator Busted or Sued State Salaries Report Fraud/Abuse Child Care Facility Review and Complaint info
Sports
Local Sports High School College Clemson Carolina Battery Family Circle Cup Riverdogs Stingrays National Sports Sports Columnists Life in the Minors
Business
Local Business Business Review Real Estate Automotive Columnists
Multimedia
Video Audio Photo Galleries Evening Post Books eBooks Kindle Edition New! iPhone App Android App Man On The Street In The News Share Photos
Entertainment
CharlestonScene Events Restaurants Movies TV Listings Music Columnists Games Comics
Features
Savvy Shopper  New! Moxie Your Health Family Life Arts/Travel Home/Garden Food People Faith/Values Your Faith Asking Around Columnists Weddings
Supplements
Spoleto Today New! Wine + Food SEWE North Charleston Magazine My Charleston Lowcountry Parent Tideline Magazine Lowcountry Paws Attorney Directory Real Estate Guide All Supplements
Blogs
State Politics Battery RiverDogs Stingrays Carolina The Citadel Clemson College of Charleston Prep Sports Lowcountry Links Running Family Life Parenting Lowcountry Roots
Editorial
Editorials Letters to the Editor Submit a Letter Commentary Cartoons
Customer Care
Contact Us About Us Subscribe Place An Ad


State Supreme Court upholds rules on wetlands

Associated Press
Tuesday, February 2, 2010



COLUMBIA — The South Carolina Supreme Court has upheld rules on regulating freshwater wetlands on the coast.

The State newspaper reported the decision released Monday overturns a 2008 lower-court verdict that had declared invalid state rules protecting the wetlands.

Isolated wetlands have essentially had no federal protection in South Carolina since a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court ruling curtailed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' authority. That ruling left state regulators with authority to limit or stop development on the soggy land, but that has been questioned.

Stan Barnett is a lawyer for a business group that had challenged state authority and says he has little choice but to accept the new decision.

Developers can get permission to build in wetlands from the Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links