CURRENTS: SCIENCE & CONSERVATION
Turning the tide
Jim Yergin and John Kooper, volunteers with Nature Conservancy, check the “oyster castles” that the organization placed at the edge of the Intracoastal Waterway near Jeremy Creek in McClellanville last month. Yergin was surprised at how fast organisms have begun attaching themselves to the blocks.
The report is as chilling as ice: 85 percent of the world’s oyster beds present 100 years ago are gone, and the rest are in severe decline. Even in the shell-rich Lowcountry, about half the beds are gone.
The hope for saving these oysters lies with leading-edge restoration efforts like those under way in South Carolina, according to a first-of-its-kind global assessment of oyster reefs. The Nature Conservancy report calls oyster reefs “one of, and likely the most, imperiled marine habitat on earth.”
The report this summer followed a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration study last year that indicated nearly half the coral reef ecosystems in United States territory are in poor or fair condition, and the Caribbean Sea had lost half its coral systems in less than five years.
“I think oysters are going to start getting the attention that coral reefs did,” said Joy Brown, a Nature Conservancy marine restoration specialist in Charleston.
That’s the value of the odd-looking, castle-like stacks of shell and concrete blocks the conservancy has placed along Jeremy Island on the Intracoastal Waterway near McClellanville. They are “oyster castles,” a sort of substitute shell bed to which oyster spat, or larvae, can attach and begin their own oyster reefs. Unlike recycled shell beds, the three-dimensional castles create a nooks-and-crannies habitat for oysters, crabs and other species.
The reefs also help control marsh erosion.
The Jeremy Island site is a pilot project that could be extended throughout the Lowcountry as well as elsewhere, rebuilding entire oyster reef ecosystems, if it works and grant money can be lured.
The castles aren’t hard to come by; recycled shells have been. Some 80,000-90,000 bushels of oysters are harvested in South Carolina each year. Despite running a reef restoration program since the early 1990s, the S.C. Natural Resources Department still has to buy some 60 percent of more than 30,000 bushels of shells that are placed in the water to build new beds annually.
And budget cuts crimped the program this year; only 28,000 bushels were planted.
This month, the conservancy and the Natural Resources Department will launch a restaurant shell recycling project with an $18,000 grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which potentially could bring in that other 60 percent of shells, Brown said. Restaurants use the majority of the oysters harvested, and she hopes at least 19 Charleston area restaurants will take part.
“It’s something outside the box,” she said, “something a lot of people haven’t done before.”
The report, “Shellfish Reefs At Risk,” blames the loss of oyster reefs on destructive fishing practices, coastal development and water pollution.
“We’re seeing an unprecedented and alarming decline in the condition of oyster reefs, a critically important habitat in the world’s bays and estuaries,” said Mike Beck, the report’s conservancy marine scientist and lead author. “However, realistic and cost-effective solutions within conservation and coastal restoration programs, along with policy and reef-management improvements, provide hope for the survival of shellfish,” he said in the news release.
In South Carolina, Beaufort County received one of the report’s few “good” ratings — meaning fewer than half of its oyster beds have been lost in the past 100 years. Charleston County received a “fair” rating, indicating a loss from 50 percent to 90 percent.
Oyster habitat in South Carolina has gradually declined over the past two decades. The S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control has closed about one-third of the state’s 3,000 acres of oyster beds to harvesting because of pollution. But the annual harvest has remained about the same, and Natural Resources officials disagreed with the report findings.
“We don’t think we’re nearly so bad. Our stocks have been fairly stable the past couple of decades,” said David Whitaker, Natural Resources fisheries management director. “The numbers of our oysters are actually pretty good.”


Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Notice about comments:Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.