Cargo ship identified as source of oil spill
By David MacDougall
The Coast Guard announced Tuesday that the source of an oil spill that deposited black globs of oil on 60 miles of area shoreline last month was the John F, a 600-foot cargo vessel.
The spill was first noticed Oct. 20 when oil slicks were spotted in the harbor and barrier-island residents began complaining about the black deposits on the beaches.
Deposits were found on the beaches at Sullivan's Island, Fort Sumter, Folly Beach and Kiawah, Seabrook and Edisto islands.
It took 10 days for more than 50 people from Coast Guard Sector Charleston, the S.C. departments of Health and Environmental Control and Natural Resources, and contractors from Moran Environmental Services to clean up the mess.
Workers removed more than 2,600 bags filled with oily debris and sand for a total effort of more than 550 man-hours at a cost of approximately $330,000, the Coast Guard said.
The cost was paid by the Coast Guard National Pollution Funds Center's oil spill liability trust fund. There was no evidence of direct impact to wildlife or fisheries.
The Coast Guard sent samples of the oily deposits to a forensic laboratory for analysis. Results of those tests, coupled with witness accounts, led Coast Guard investigators to conclude that the John F was responsible, the Coast Guard said in a press release.
The John F's owner was formally notified by the National Pollution Fund Center on Thursday of possible liability for this incident, the release said.
The master of the John F had reported a 10-gallon oil spill to the National Response Center Oct. 19. That spill occurred during a transfer of heavy bunker fuel from a barge to the ship at the anchorage off Crab Bank in Charleston Harbor.
The John F's owners hired a local response contractor to clean up oil spilled on the ship's decks and hull. According to reports from witnesses, when the contractor arrived at the John F, there was no oil seen in the water.
The wide area that was impacted by the tar balls was consistent with a spill of up to a few hundred gallons, the release said.
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Notice about comments:Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Off campus
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life

