DeMint criticized for procedural motion in benefits vote

By Robert Behre
The Post and Courier
Originally published 12:00 a.m., November 5, 2009
Updated 11:58 a.m., November 5, 2009



U.S. Sen Jim DeMint voted Wednesday to extend unemployment benefits to hard-hit states such as South Carolina.

But one candidate who wants his job did not like that DeMint initially voted against a procedural motion before voting on the final bill.

Chad McGowan, a Rock Hill lawyer who is running as a Democrat for the Senate seat next year, noted South Carolina's unemployment rate is more than 11 percent.

"It's troubling that Senator DeMint decided to turn his back on over 250,000 South Carolinians who are out looking for a job," he said in a statement. "I would have joined every other Senator in America in voting to extend unemployment benefits to the hard-working people of this state."

But a spokesman for DeMint, R-S.C., said he merely voted against a procedural motion.

"Senator DeMint opposed multiple efforts by Democrats to cut off debate and block improvements to the bill, but he supports extending unemployment insurance and will vote for the legislation," DeMint press secretary Wesley Denton said.

"He's disappointed it is being paid for by increasing burdens on small businesses that create jobs instead of using unspent stimulus funds," Denton said.

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., voted for the procedural vote, and two Democratic senators did not vote.

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or at rbehre@postandcourier.com.

Editor's Note: Earlier versions of this story did not include the final vote on unemployment benefits. The Post and Courier regrets the error.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.