Saving some green

Proposed projects would protect more than 2,700 acres

By David Slade
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, May 12, 2009



The new round of greenbelt projects proposed in Charleston County would protect land from Awendaw to Edisto, with easements to keep large properties from being developed and purchases aimed at creating public parks and green spaces.

photo

The Post and Courier

The path home for North Charleston High School students Eric Steplight (from left), Moises Lomeli and Eduardo Lomeli traverses a marsh along O'Hear Avenue that Charleston County is considering adding to its greenbelt holdings.

Add them up and the projects, if approved, would protect more than 2,700 acres at a cost of nearly $24 million, with the money coming from the half-cent sales tax that voters approved in a 2004 referendum.

One of the deals already has been completed, and the greenbelt money would be used to reimburse the costs. It is North Charleston's $208,900 purchase of a 16.5-acre tract along Filbin Creek between the Mark Clark Expressway and the Oak Terrace Preserve development.

"We've been after that piece for two years" and recently closed on the purchase, city Grants Administrator Shannon Praete said.

The Greenbelt Bank Board has rejected one plan, from the town of Awendaw, to acquire a 30-acre parcel for $4.5 million. The rest of the proposals have been recommended by the bank board or the Urban Grants Review Committee, or are awaiting further action.

County Council gets the final say. Typically, the bank board wants to see greenbelt projects with substantial amounts of matching funds, which can come from other branches of government, nonprofit groups or the landowners themselves. When matching funds are counted, the proposed projects are worth nearly $44 million.

With conservation easement deals, landowners often donate a large portion of the value of the easement, which gives them state and federal tax deductions. The value of an easement is usually the difference between what a property could be worth if developed versus what it's worth if it can't be developed.

The largest easement deal proposed in the current round of greenbelt funding would protect a peninsula-like 1,762-acre property where the Edisto and Wadmalaw rivers meet, near Yonge's Island, known as White Point Plantation.

The property is 882 acres of high ground surrounded by marsh, and the Lowcountry Open Land Trust is seeking nearly $2.4 million in greenbelt funds for that deal.

The trust also is seeking funds to purchase an easement on a 146-acre Johns Island property known as Palmetto Point.

The second-largest land deal comes from the Nature Conservancy, which is seeking nearly $1.2 million toward the purchase of a 374-acre tract of private land within the Francis Marion National Forest known as the Boardman Tract.

The protection of private land within the national forest has been a priority of the greenbelt program.

The way the greenbelt program works is funds support rural land preservation deals outside of Charleston County's designated urban growth areas and projects within urban areas that are often aimed at creating new parks and other public spaces.

Previous story

Nearly 8,000 acres conserved, published 03/16/09

North Charleston, which submitted five of the six urban projects for the current round of funding, hopes to buy properties ranging in size from a quarter-acre to 16.5 acres. Those properties would be used for small "pocket" parks, and to potentially create walking trails and boardwalks along Noisette Creek.

The town of James Island submitted the other urban project, which involves buying an undeveloped lot in the Clearview subdivision for $160,000 to create a small park.

"It's supposed to just be an open space," said James Island Councilman Joe Qualey, who lives in the Clearview neighborhood. "We don't have a specific use for it."

All of the greenbelt proposals are expected to go before County Council at a committee meeting May 28.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

zekemire (anonymous) says...

Ridiculous use of tax money! Consevation easements are maybe a good thing as long as the properties stay in PRIVATE HANDS! Governments should never own any property not needed for offices. water, sewer or schools! The USA is based on the rule of PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY!

May 12, 2009 at 9:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Reader (anonymous) says...

I think this is a great use of tax money. Far, far better than most.

Parks are a time-honored public function dating back centuries in this country. Look at Boston Commons for a famous example, but there are lots and lots of other examples right here. Protecting beautiful landscapes is well worth the money we spend on it.

The modern twist of using conservation easements (where the land ALWAYS remains in private hands and taxable) is an even better solution since it allows the government to leverage more valuable conserved space with less money.

Good going!

May 12, 2009 at 10:05 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Numba10 (anonymous) says...

How about Greenspace for farming--tax free inside the city limits--local food from local people---even greenhouses growing food only within city limits should be tax free

May 12, 2009 at 12:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

wjhamilton3 (anonymous) says...

This recession is probably the last time local government will have the opportunity to secure green space reserves and parkland critical to our long term competitiveness. From the Walmart parking lot, life in Mt. Pleasant isn't much different from live in metropolitan Atlanta, where the work pays better. Our cultural and natural resources are our sole competitive advantage.

Without access to preserved components of the natural environment, all the other property in the region becomes less valuable. Taxing everything and leaving it all in unrestricted private ownership will probably mean lower tax revenues.

Consider what Waterfront Park in Downtown Charleston does for property values in the surrounding neighborhoods. It could have been condo towers surrounded by surface parking lots, like Dockside. Instead it is now one of the City's most desirable neighborhoods providing density, quality of life and green space in a tight, urban fabric. You can easily dispense with car ownership, walk to work, dining and even the grocery store there.

The same effect is exerted by James Island County park, but the impacts aren't as dramatic.

May 12, 2009 at 12:21 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

counterpoint (anonymous) says...

Well said, wjhamilton3.

May 12, 2009 at 12:34 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

dm (anonymous) says...

The green space conservation folks might spend some of their money trying to force the City of Folly Beach to honor its contract with the Corps of Engineers to protect open spaces. In return for renourishment, the City was not to allow any building of houses in the sand dunes in front of the existing houses beyond the Washout.

May 12, 2009 at 10:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

PalmettoDP (anonymous) says...

I think this is a good program because it isn't forcibly taking land, and offers significant tax breaks to those choosing to donate conservation easements.

The county's program operates in much the same way as the Edisto Island Open Land Trust, which is private.

This is one of the few cases where a government entity is wisely spending money.

May 12, 2009 at 11:04 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

DixieGal (anonymous) says...

I think that this is a great use of tax payer money. I am no tree hugging hippie, but I do believe that unless we protect the earth and beautiful lowcountry we have now, there will be nothing for our children and our children's children to enjoy.

May 13, 2009 at 9:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.