Tax increase may be stubbed out
Vote by Senate panel ignites debate that's likely to delay proposals until January
COLUMBIA — South Carolina smokers probably won't have to pay an extra 50 cents for a pack of cigarettes this year, thanks to a legislative battle that's broken out in the session's final days.
And because of that same conflict, low-income workers probably won't get help this year paying for health insurance.
"The cigarette tax proposals may be delayed until January with no clear-cut agreement over how to spend the money," said Sen. Larry Grooms, R-Bonneau. "It's a straight-up tax increase."
A decision Thursday by the Senate Finance Committee opens up a major fight on the Senate floor that likely won't be resolved with only six legislative days left before the anticipated summer adjournment.
More info
SC Policy Council's economic analysis of the cigarette tax bill
Read a press release from the SC Tobacco Collaborative
Read Speaker of the House Bobby Harrell's statement about the bill
Grooms was one of five senators on the committee who voted against a plan to raise the state's 7-cents-a-pack tax by 50 cents as of July 1. The proposal, which was approved in a 16-5 vote, calls for putting the $147 million the tax increase is estimated to generate annually into a bank account for at least a year. That would give Congress time to decide what to do about President Barack Obama's plan for universal health care.
The change could spell the end for the bill, which will be a tough sell in the GOP-controlled Legislature. Republican Gov. Mark Sanford already has promised to veto any tax increase that does not come with a corresponding decrease.
House Speaker Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, authored the original bill that would have increased the tax and used the bulk of the money to provide tax credits to small businesses as an incentive for them to purchase private health-care coverage for their lower-income workers.
The bill
Read bill 3584, "to impose a surtax on each cigarette," (Statehouse web site)
The new plan opens up the potential for the Legislature to decide to raise the tax and use the money for any number of reasons, Harrell said. The "tax now, wait and see method" is dangerous, he said.
"I think the committee's decision to stockpile the money has put getting the bill passed this session in serious doubt," Harrell said. "I don't know very many people in the House who want to grow government with this money."
Harrell's plan would have set aside $5 million for smoking cessation and about $3 million for the promotion of South Carolina crops. But as part of the Senate committee's revision, that money is wiped out and $5 million would be sent to Hollings Cancer Center for tobacco-related cancer research. The Senate budget calls for $2 million in general funds to be used for smoking cessation.
Despite the uphill climb, some legislators remain optimistic about the bill's chances this year.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Hugh Leatherman said he isn't certain the plan is doomed this year, given the strong support expressed in the committee vote. Many committee members, chiefly Senate Minority Leader John Land of Manning, said it was wise to put the money aside so the state has resources on hand if Congress demands matching money for a new federal health care plan.
"I think it has a great chance of passing this year," said Leatherman, R-Florence.
South Carolina has not increased the cigarette tax since 1977. It is the lowest in the nation, which convenience store owners testify is a boon, especially to stores along the North Carolina and Georgia borders.
Georgia taxes each pack of cigarettes at 37 cents. The rate in North Carolina is 35 cents.
The federal government raised its portion of the tax by 62 cents on March 31, increasing it to $1.01 a pack, which provides money that is used to extend health care coverage to 4 million uninsured children.
Michael Fields, executive director of the South Carolina Petroleum Marketers Association, said raising the cigarette tax to a rate higher than neighboring states puts South Carolina retailers in a bad spot.
"To take us from the lowest in the country to the highest in the Southeast during these economic times is bad news, not only for convenience store owners but for the people who choose to smoke," Fields said. "That's frustrating."
Reach Yvonne Wenger at ywenger@postandcourier.com or 803-799-9051.

Comments
CHRISJIII (anonymous) says...
Who ever believed that the money would be used for health care for the poor anyway? This is a republican controlled state after all.
May 8, 2009 at 8:35 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
tc2 (anonymous) says...
Doesn't matter who is in control or what state. Whatever excuse is used for a new tax as soon as they get the tax the excuse is forgotten or ignored. Even the billions from the huge tobacco settlement years ago was by most states spent on almost everything but what they said they were suing for and would use it for.
May 8, 2009 at 9:13 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
majorjohnson (anonymous) says...
tc2 is exactly right. They borrowed against that money, bonded it and used it for everything under the sun except what they said they were suing for. They'd do the same with this tax money. At the very least they would just use this money to replace some other money that they could then spend somewhere else. Grits festival anyone?
And why do we need taxes for health care anyway? Obama is gonna make health care free!
May 8, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KidYendor (anonymous) says...
We should have low cigarette taxes and a nineteen year old for beer drinking age to lure everyone across the border. I am glad I do not smoke to donate more to federal boondoggling by Congress.
May 8, 2009 at 11:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
coolfreaknbeans (anonymous) says...
I'm so sick of "sin" type taxes and "feel good" legislation, I could puke.
May 8, 2009 at 1:08 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
cfdoo7 (anonymous) says...
Obama already raised the tax by 62 cents. I know people that are already quitting because they can't afford that increase.
Raise it another 50 cents and the revenue won't be what they expect.
May 10, 2009 at 12:24 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.