Obama calls for pay to reflect performance

President's first major speech on schools evokes hostility from teachers unions

By LIBBY QUAID
Associated Press
Wednesday, March 11, 2009



WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama called for tying teachers' pay to students' performance and expanding innovative charter schools Tuesday, embracing ideas that have provoked hostility from members of teachers unions.

He also suggested longer school days — and years — to help America's children compete in the world.

In his first big speech on education, Obama said the United States must drastically improve student achievement to regain lost international standing.

"The future belongs to the nation that best educates its citizens," he said. "We have everything we need to be that nation ... and yet, despite resources that are unmatched anywhere in the world, we have let our grades slip, our schools crumble, our teacher quality fall short and other nations outpace us."

His solutions include teacher pay and charter school proposals that have met resistance among members of teachers unions, which constitute an important segment of the Democratic Party.

Obama acknowledged that conflict, saying, "Too many supporters of my party have resisted the idea of rewarding excellence in teaching with extra pay, even though we know it can make a difference in the classroom."

Despite their history on the issues, union leaders publicly welcomed Obama's words, saying it seems clear he wants to include them in his decisions in a way former President George W. Bush did not.

"President Obama always says he will do it with educators, not to them," said Dennis van Roekel, president of the 3.2 million-member National Education Association.

"That is a wonderful feeling, for the president of the United States to acknowledge and respect the professional knowledge and skills that those educators bring to every job in the school," van Roekel said.

Van Roekel insisted that Obama's call for teacher performance pay does not necessarily mean raises or bonuses would be tied to student test scores. It could mean more pay for board-certified teachers or for those who work in high-poverty, hard-to-staff schools, he said.

However, administration officials said later they do mean higher pay based on student achievement, among other things.

"What you want to do is really identify the best and brightest by a range of metrics, including student achievement," Education Secretary Arne Duncan told The Associated Press in a brief interview.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said certification is part of the mix. "But the president believes that school systems can work with teachers and parents to come up with a system that rewards our best teachers with more pay for their excellence in the classroom."

There also has been considerable friction over charter schools, which are publicly funded but operate independently, free from some of the rules that constrain regular schools. Many teachers are concerned that such schools drain money and talent from regular schools.

However, Obama said state limits on the number of charter schools aren't "good for our children, our economy or our country." He said many of the innovations in education today are happening in charter schools.

Obama addressed the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a setting intended to underscore the need to boost academic performance.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

cappy (anonymous) says...

"The future belongs to the nation that best educates its citizens," he said. "We have everything we need to be that nation ... and yet, despite resources that are unmatched anywhere in the world, we have let our grades slip, our schools crumble, our teacher quality fall short and other nations outpace us"

Yes we could be that nation but we are not. We lower standards to get those students passed who won't (not can't) learn because it's not cool. Their parent(no plural) are not educated themselves and could care less about schools other than it gets the kids out of the house and out of momma's hair for the day. When we raise our standards and get the parents involved in their kids education then we will be that nation.

March 11, 2009 at 8:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

otherhalf (anonymous) says...

Thank you, cappy, for acknowledging what Obama did not. Parents play a much larger role than teachers ever could. Children must be first taught at home that diligence and hard work are not mere options, but requirements. If a child is not taught that at home, a teacher can not as effectively do his/her job in teaching.

March 11, 2009 at 9:43 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

eyfigueroa (anonymous) says...

I must agree with both you.

There is a direct correlation between levels of parental involvement and levels of academic success.

To ignore that fact is disingenuous at best and dangerouse at its worst.

March 11, 2009 at 11:04 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

iceman1978 (anonymous) says...

Excellent post cappy.

March 11, 2009 at 11:52 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

alexloo (anonymous) says...

has he lost his mind? saying that teachers are the problem. tell him to get in front of a room full of 30 or more kids who have been pushed through the system. tell him to spend his salary on supplies for the classroom and clothes for the kids who cant afford it. tell him to cry every night for the kid who is in his 3RD foster home in one week. and then tell me that MY performance is why the kids arent "up to standard". then let some idiot from the school board come and mark you down because you didnt have the standard up on the wall for the work you displayed in YOUR ROOM!

but yes please tell me who gets to decide whose "performance" is more deserving.

March 11, 2009 at 11:44 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

GermanyXO (anonymous) says...

It sounds as if our president is suggesting that parents aren't responsible for children's performance in school.

How about our president propose a licensing program for parents' ability to teach children the importance of reading, writing, science, math, social studies, and fair play?

Or how about proposing a national law to commit parents to parenthood-rehab for failing to raise children to commit to academic excellence?

No, that would be asking too much from men and women brain-washed with broad, left-wing, entitlement belief structures!

No Child Left Behind has done nothing to raise academic standards in our classrooms. It has only lowered academic standards in our classrooms so that even the least intelligent students, unwilling to apply themselves to the quest for academic excellence, are taught to believe they have what it takes to "make the grade".

No Child Left Behind has done nothing more than twist our teachers' arms to lower the challenging nature of their academic teaching plans to the point at which all students are taught to excel at a lower standard. Schools in Charleston are masters at this practice: "Let's reverse engineer our schools, call them charter schools, and make it so our grading scales reflect a lower level of effort required to excel, thus making a child believe effort and intelligence deserving of a "C" or less (to truly excel at the collegiate level) leads to an "A" on a report card.

How about our president propose legislation to reduce pay for parents who have parented children that continue to fail in this rat race we call life?

March 12, 2009 at 5:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links