Noisette: Now that lenders have filed a $23.8M foreclosure suit, what happens next?
Company remains optimistic, will shift focus to separate, 100-acre plot
By Robert Behre
The Post and Courier
The foreclosure suit has slowed, but not totally halted, the Noisette Co.'s plan to redevelop the former Charleston Naval Base.
Video
Touring Noisette
Take a tour of the Noisette Co.'s holdings on the former Charleston Naval Base, including those subject to the foreclosure suit.
Previous stories
Read a selection of Post and Courier stories about the Noisette property from March 2001 to present.
One of the many signs displayed inside the Noisette Co.'s headquarters is the simple statement: "Noisette is Faith."
For those who would like to believe in the company's ability to follow through on its ambitious plans for renovating the former Charleston Naval Base, that statement is truer than ever.
A $23.8 million foreclosure suit was filed last week against the Navy Yard at Noisette, a suit that threatens to derail or at least delay redevelopment on two-thirds of its property.
Company officials, including Chief Executive Officer John Knott, were quick to say the company hopes to refinance its debt with Capmark Finance Inc. and other lenders so it can keep focusing on the entire 340 acres of the old Navy base that it bought from the city of North Charleston six years ago.
But even if that doesn't pan out, the company still owns 100 acres not mortgaged under that loan, and it is turning more attention there.
The foreclosure also may have little effect on the vast ongoing redevelopment of the 3,000 acres extending north and west from the former Navy base's northern end, a redevelopment the company helped plan shortly after its inception in 2001.
"The Navy Yard is part of Noisette. It is not Noisette," Knott said. "That's what everybody gets confused about."
The company's willingness to plan for a wider revitalization — plus its commitment to build a new Riverfront Park for the city and to create new nonprofits to raise environmental awareness and rehabilitate ex-convicts — was one reason the city gave the company such a good deal on the 340 acres.
The $9.6 million that Noisette paid the city is far less than the $23.8 million that it was able to borrow against 240 of those acres just a few years later.
Just as the Navy base was a hodgepodge of historic mansions, metal warehouses, nice office buildings and a heavy industrial shipyard, the impacts from the pending foreclosure could prove to be an equally mixed bag.
A tour of the base with Noisette's Director of Development Jeff Baxter shed light on which areas have something at stake as the drama plays out.
North of the creek
While the Noisette Co. has yet to build the thousands of new homes, offices and retail spaces called for in its redevelopment plan, it has leased out many of the vacant buildings. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the area north of Noisette Creek.
More than half a dozen businesses have moved into these bland warehouse spaces to do everything from building structural house panels to distilling diesel fuel from animal fat.
Baxter said the company's long-term vision here has shifted from a marina-centered development to an "eco-industrial" park.
David Merritt found a suitable vacant building here to start Coast Brewing Co. What once was climate-controlled storage for Navy documents now houses barrels that produce about 20 kegs of beer a week.
Merritt's lease runs only about three more years, and he is concerned about what might happen if this land changes hands in the foreclosure suit. Other businesses with leases here are watching and wondering, too.
"I don't want to pack my stuff and go anywhere. I just got it in here," Merritt said. "We don't want to see any overtaking by the train companies. That's the biggest worry, that the big train guys are going to come in and buy it up."
One spot along the creek is earmarked for an eventual museum dedicated for the Hunley, the Confederate submarine now being restored farther south on the base.
"We try to hedge our bets with the future," Baxter said. "We don't know what's going to happen here, but in the meantime, we'll do this."
Historic hospital area
The Noisette Co. was planning to redevelop the base's historic hospital district in its third and final phase, but Baxter said the company is turning more attention there because this largely vacant property is not part of the foreclosure suit.
"If you can't reassess and adjust the plan," he said, "you're going to die."
The district includes several older buildings eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and most of them are painted white and in need of cosmetic repairs. The overall area is only about 10 percent occupied.
The company had planned to demolish the hospital, but now is considering ways to reuse it, possibly for senior housing or some other use.
"It will take a while," Baxter said. "I don't know what the ultimate solution could be, but there could be a great project out there."
Old officers' housing
An even more historic and scenic part of the base is the collection of fine homes nestled in the gentle hills near the base's Riverfront Park. Before the base shut down in 1995, this was where the admiral and other top officers lived.
Most of these buildings either have been repaired or sealed up, with the rotted portico on the admiral's house in the worst shape.
A chain link fence separates this housing area from the new Riverfront Park, although the company hoped the housing would become an attractive public zone instead of a gated community of private homes.
Noisette has leased a few buildings here — the television show "Army Wives" is being shot around one — and the nonprofit group SC Strong has leased two others to help its mission of providing new training and help to ex-convicts.
Instead of dividing the property into private residences, the company has hoped to redevelop these buildings as a small inn, a restaurant and an event and wedding center.
Those plans never got off the drawing boards and now remain even further up in the air because this area falls under the foreclosure suit.
Storehouse Row
The row of old warehouse buildings that line the shipyard site was where Noisette began, when it renovated No. 7 Storehouse Row for its offices.
Since then it has renovated 10 Storehouse Row, a space now largely leased to artists, a restaurant and the American College of the Building Arts.
The metal warehouses across the street are leased by Charleston Marine Containers Inc. and Celadon, a Lowcountry furniture retailer.
Baxter said the company is looking to sell the historic brick warehouses at 8 and 9 Storehouse Row for renovation, as well as the more modern-looking 6 Storehouse Row.
Baxter said the older buildings particularly are well- suited for residential use, especially since about 750 people work at a SPAWAR facility across the street.
Across McMillan Avenue, workers have begun stripping old industrial pipes and boilers from the outside of the Powerhouse, one of the most imposing buildings on the base.
Powerhouse Basin
A final large swath of property affected by the foreclosure suit is the roughly 40 acres of parking lot along Spruill and McMillan avenues, at the front door of the base.
The company borrowed the $23.8 million as a bridge loan to finance engineering and other planning work to redo the roads and utility lines here to support a dense urban development of multifamily residential, offices and stores.
The plan called for a new Powerhouse Basin, a tidal lake that would solve the area's drainage problems while making an attractive focal point.
Whereas other parts of the base are being reused and modified a little at a time, this was where the most dramatic and dense transformation was to take place.
North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey said he thinks it still will be, regardless of whether Noisette retains this land or it's bought by someone else.
"It's going to be interesting to see where it goes," he said, "but I can assure you that it's the belief of the administration that it will be a successful development no matter who is at the helm."
Reach Robert Behre at rbehre@postandcourier.com or 937-5771.
Comments
TheTruthFighter (anonymous) says...
Ha-Ha-Ha - Anybody with a brain should have known this project was going to fail from the beginning. There was absolutely NO DUE Diligence on this firm before the city enter into the ridiculous agreement. This has to be one of the dumbest decision that the Mayor and the City Council has every approved and some should lose their job. Just go back and read the P & C stories on this transaction, it was dirty from the very beginning. Just like in Corporate America today, remove the CEO of the City! If Hilary Douglas would have played his cards right, this one transaction would have made him Mayor of N. Charleston.
June 14, 2009 at 6:54 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CNSYD (anonymous) says...
The best use of this entire area was already here prior to 1993. However, BMW Campbell had zero interest is helping save it. Our 1st district representative was asleep at the wheel and made the mistake of thinking his R buddies in the White House would look out for him.
June 14, 2009 at 7:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
TheTruthFighter (anonymous) says...
I have seen many people knock the Post & Courier on many issues, but when it comes to the Noisette project, they deserve a journalist award. This story was masterfully reported! I'm still is disbelief on the deception, lie's, etc surrounding this story! Kudo's to the P & C on this one!
June 14, 2009 at 7:51 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
moonpie (anonymous) says...
I agree with all post above. But NOW the shipard is gone, american workers lost their jobs and moved on. At this time there are as many illegals there as legals.
But right from the beginning with Noisette you saw problems and yet the mayor stayed with them.
Yeah good story P&C but you never say what the city invested and what the people lost???
June 14, 2009 at 8:02 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
TRUTH-FIGHTER........
This story is at HOW OLD.......??? Think about it....?? This should have been NEWS for WHAT election cycle..!??!
....When do you think the BANKERS new..??
...When do you think certain CONTRACTORS knew...??
...When do you think MAYOR Summey, and RILEY knew..??
A janitor for Goodwill Industries was screaming over a year ago and SHE did not even WORK there...!!!!!!
Certain Rail workers knew 2 YEARS ago about the SMOKE ....!?!?!
.....are we to be dumb enough to believe that the RAIL Issue is just NOW coming to suface....!?!?!?!
The Neck Area Developers along with the Post and Courier REAL Estate Division and area Development Boards....AND OTHERS are taking EVERYONE of US all for a gentrification tax pimpin' RIDE.....!!!!!!
The P&C should be detailing what PLAYERz and SOLUTIONz were crafted and agreed upon 6 Months ago to bring about the DUST flying right NOW....!?!?!
MAERSK's move just did NOT happen over night.....!!! The Union Brass knew about this 3 years ago at least...!!!!!!
June 14, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
kerwandstarks (anonymous) says...
Just one in a growing list of failures by Mayor Keith. Remember the ALF calamity? Watson Hill? New shops near Trident? More minimum wage jobs. Wescott?
He is all smoke and mirrors. Robs Peter to pay Paul.
When are you people going to vote him out?
June 14, 2009 at 9:33 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
WhyDoIBother (anonymous) says...
Doomed from day 1. 1. No waterfront property. Priced like waterfront property. 2. Lot's of good ideas, before their time. 3. Wrong location, boardered by "bad" neighborhoods/low cost housing/slumlords....again pricing too high 4. Believed their own press 5. Would not listen to the market and change, zero flexability
This was/is the DREAMER'S BALL. Change the plan because the lender will.
June 14, 2009 at 10:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CaptPete (anonymous) says...
Paid over nine million then re mortaged the land. Sounds like a broke investor. This should have been a warning. Maybe the port will now buy the land and make a bigger port.
June 14, 2009 at 11:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
firemike (anonymous) says...
I thought the story was very well written. The Who, What, Where, and Why was addressed properly. Look at Robert Behre other stories. He is a really good reporter. I can't imagine how much work he must have done to get this story done. He is defiantly not a sloucher.
A lot of people knew about Noisette's problems but we all heard about it from people's randomly talk. Unless you get people willing to go on the record and have proof of problems it is irresponsible to publish a story about the subject matter.
I normally read these post left on this site about the stories and get fired up by the ignorance of the posters. This is not the case today. EVERYONE makes good points today.
I had the opportunity to work for a company back in the early 2000's who had to deal with Noisette. Boy were they arrogant! The same arrogance that banks, car dealers, commercial Realtors, auto manufacturers, credit card companies, and financial advisers used to have. "The Navy Yard is part of Noisette. It is not Noisette," - good luck John Knott. That attitude will only help your company fail. Even if his statement is true being humble in this economy is not a sign of weakness.
A lot of people knew that the Noisette's deal to get the base was helped by kickbacks and good old boy deals. This only goes to show the bigger you are the harder you fall (kinda like our very own government).
June 14, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
FIREMIKE....great observation !!!
"...The Who, What, Where, and Why was addressed properly.."
well...maybe so. However, just like a package from the Post Office.....IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHEN THE NEWS IS..DELIVERED !!!
Some packages to certain locations always show up WET and LATE...!!!!
As for Robert or KEN or Diane or CHARLES or POP TART or Yvonne or David or WARREN or any other fine WORKER (including the Janitor); the Critical Acclaim that I and other posters bestow on these fine fellow citizens should be WORN with a BADGE of Honor...!! We all know they have goodness in there hearts.....heck even DARTH VADER's goodness showed up EVENTUALLY...!!!!!! We know they all.....
1) ..Feel the breeze and know we have WIND ENERGY that Lonnie Carter chooses not to harness because he take the easy way out instead of facing the BREEZE...!!
2) ..Have trash that goes to the DUMP instead of being PLASMAFIED using PLasma Converters from www.startech.net to close all LANDFILLS ...FOREVER...!!!!
3) ...burn foreign OIL to get to work or cover a story out in the boonies instead of supporting LOCAL SC Farmerz that should be producing ALGAE Bio-Diesel... www.valcent.net
4)...are helpless to write about SKYTRAN to educate the public about NEW Technology from www.unimodal.com and instead support MAYOR Summey's trucker glory by building California FREEWAYS ...12 lanes WIDE...!?!?!
5) .....have no idea about fellow SC workers that build diesel ENGINES at BMW or nuclear workers in AIKEN thatproduce NUCLEAR....WHAT????
6) .....ACT like the TIN MAN and Dorothy in front of OZ when it comes to gettin' in front of any elected officials FACE with a QUESTION from actual READERz or POSTERz....!!!!
7) .....oh well....the question is ...WHAT ARE THEY PASSIONATE ABOUT ...??? We want to know...!!!?? Its time for them to stop hangin out in the MORGUE and get START gettin' jiggy...!!!!
WE....ARE...FED...UP !!!!!!!!!
June 14, 2009 at 3:49 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
firemike (anonymous) says...
zoomru you forgot to mention the eduction here in SC...LOL
June 15, 2009 at 12:56 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Shared
- Upper King on rise: Hotels, apartments, restaurants changing face of downtown area
- Missing woman case gets murkier
- Texts from missing Mount Pleasant woman's phone 'normal'
- Missing woman's fiance found dead in his home
- Body of missing woman's fiance was found near handgun
- Pinterest: Pinning hopes and dreams
- DAVID SLADE: S.C. offers hybrid car tax credit
- Facebook posts may cost you a job
- Magnolia Gardens offering free dream wedding to contest winner
- Black women today: Strong. Resilient. Ambitious.


