Letting dues slide costing some their homes

By PAUL J. WEBER
Associated Press
Friday, June 12, 2009


IRVING, Texas — Thousands of Americans who have generally kept up with their mortgages are still in danger of losing their homes because they made a fateful trade-off in this shaky economy — they let their homeowner association dues slide.

photo

AP

Thousands of Americans who have more or less kept up with their mortgages are still in danger of losing their homes because they made a fateful trade-off in this shaky economy Â-Â-- they let their homeowner association dues slide. Steve and Lacey Pilat are among those who have been threatened with foreclosure after Lacey lost her job catering corporate parties, and the couple nearly lost the house.

Many homeowners are learning to their surprise that condo and neighborhood associations that oversee security patrols, mow lawns, plant flowers and clean the community swimming pool may have the right to foreclose when dues aren't paid. That right is often written into the purchase agreement signed by the homeowner.

Among those who have been threatened with foreclosure is Lacey Pilat, who lost her job catering lavish corporate parties and nearly lost her two-story house in a Dallas suburb.

"Basically, our landscaper was foreclosing on the house," said Steve Pilat, her husband. "That's the way we looked at it."

These foreclosure actions do not necessarily pit neighbor against neighbor. Many homeowner associations have turned the job of collecting member dues over to outside management companies. And to them, it's strictly business, not personal.

Homeowner association boards and their management companies defend the practice, saying maintaining the neighborhood preserves everyone's property values.

"We have compassion for those folks. At the same time, we feel for the rest of the homeowners who are paying their dues," said Andrew Schlegel, executive vice president for Merit Property

Management, which manages more than 140,000 California homes in community associations.

In California, associations can foreclose only after 12 months of missed fees or $1,800 in back dues.

"No one wants to do this," Schlegel said. "It's only coming up when people are completely obstinate about it."

In fact, most people end up saving their homes. Home-owner association boards — particularly those that have lost many of their dues-paying members to the housing collapse and the slumping economy — often work with down-on-their-luck neighbors to come up with some sort of compromise. That's what happened with the Pilats.

Gauging the number of foreclosures nationwide by homeowner association is difficult. But in Texas, foreclosure attempts initiated by homeowner associations in 19 counties are up 30 percent from two years ago, according to Dallas-based Foreclosure Listing Services.

In the San Antonio area alone, foreclosure actions by homeowner associations jumped to 170 in April from 21 in April 2008, according to RexReport.com.

In Florida, attorney Bob Tankel, who represents hundreds of homeowner and condo associations, said he has increased his staff from three to 16 in the past 18 months to handle a mounting caseload of 3,500 open collections. About one-fifth of those cases have reached foreclosure, he said.

In California, Schlegel said more than 6 percent of the homes that his company manages are in some stage of delinquency with regard to membership dues, up from around 1 percent in previous years.

More than 59 million people live in more than 300,000 association-governed communities nationwide, according to the Community Associations Institute, the nation's largest group for homeowners and condo boards.

In many of these foreclosure cases, the homeowner's name is on the mortgage, and the mortgage is held by a bank or other lender. But the purchase agreement says the homeowner association can haul the homeowner into court and begin foreclosure proceedings for nonpayment of dues.

If the house is foreclosed on, it is sold off, and the homeowner association takes what it is owed from the proceeds. Proceeds also go to the bank to pay off the mortgage.

About four months after Pilat lost her job, the management company for the Beacon Hill homeowner association sent her a foreclosure notice in April after several attempts to collect her $450 annual dues, which paid for the mowing of front lawns. The amount she owed snowballed to $1,800 after penalties and fees.

The management company eventually agreed to let the couple pay the debt over time. The Pilats cut a check for $600 in April that drained their checking account but saved the house. They are slowly paying off the $1,200 debt.

Pilat had fallen a little behind on the mortgage, too, but the bank was working with her to keep her house.

The Pilats said their neighbors on the homeowner association board never actually got involved in the dispute over dues; it was handled entirely by the management company. Neither the company nor the homeowner association returned calls for comment.

The foreclosure actions have renewed long-standing complaints that homeowner associations are often made up of power-drunk residents who enjoy lording it over their neighbors and zealously enforce the rules regarding such things as the height of the grass, the color of the house, the flying of flags and the way the porch is furnished.

"You have a number of them being run like little totalitarian regimes," said Texas state Rep. Burt Solomons, who has unsuccessfully tried passing association reforms for years in the Legislature. "Their argument is that if you don't like it, move."

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

pluffmudder (anonymous) says...

Yeah-h-h. FORECLOSE on them that don't pay their DUES. We people that don't live in condos have to keep up our yards ourselves by the sweat of our brows (literally SWEAT). You condo dwellers need to do your share of sweating too and PAY YOUR DUES! You're paying for the luxury of putting your feet up in a chair instead of getting off your lazy [expletive} and doing it yourselves!!!

June 12, 2009 at 10:52 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

joldham (anonymous) says...

THIS HAS GOT TO BE THE STUPIDEST THING I'VE EVER HEARD. WHEN DID WE GET SOOOOOOO DUMB AS TO LET HOME OWNER ASSOCIATIONS GET THIS KIND OF POWER. WE REALLY NEED TO WAKE UP HERE IN AMERICA. OUR GREED HAS AFFECTED OUR BRAINS TO LET SOMETHING LIKE THIS GET ROOTED IN OUR SOCIETY. IF WE ARE SO LAZY AS TO NOT CARE ABOUT OUR YARDS AND WE SIGN SOMETHING THAT WILL ALLOW OUR HOMES TO BE FORECLOSED UPON FOR NOT MOWING OUR GRASS AND CLEANING UP THE ENTRANCES TO OUR SUBDIVISIONS WE REALLY NEED A REALITY CHECK. I HOPE THIS KIND OF CASE GOES TO COURT AND I WILL VOLUNTEER TO BE ON THAT JURY!!!!!

June 12, 2009 at 11:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

amembersid (anonymous) says...

Wait until the government owns all the HOA'S. WE THE PEOPLE of The United Socialist States of America. If they can take the banks and the auto companies, just think what a goal that would be. It's already collected for them.

June 12, 2009 at 11:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Numba10 (anonymous) says...

None of you actually own your homes all land is owned by the government. If you think you truely own your land try not paying your property taxes and see how long you stay on it. Homeowners only control property temporarily.

June 12, 2009 at 12:14 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

amembersid (anonymous) says...

Obviously we own our property by a convienence of law (a perpetual lein on it). When it's convienent to others they have the right (law) to take it (their perpetual lein that is). 'Lein's' toward socialism to me.

June 12, 2009 at 12:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Community_Management_Group (anonymous) says...

HOAs provide necessary and valuale services. In many communities this includes water, lighting, insurance, landscape maintenance for common areas AND for homes. All who buy there agree in advance to pay these costs through the HOA - and they must all pay. There are no "bailout dollars" available to Associations.

There will be some who suggest that HOAs are socialist. I get that. I know many who own single family homes choose not to live in Associations. That choice is one I made myself recognizing that is a choice not to have recourse if a neighbor puts a doughboy pool in the front yard...or leaves rusted-out cars on blocks in view.

June 12, 2009 at 4:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JC (anonymous) says...

Puffmudder - there is a difference in owning a condo and a single famiy residence. The land the condo sits on (yes, including the grass) is owned by the association (by all) so it would be difficult to determine who would cut what blade of grass. And besides, that is why most condo owners live in a condo - because they don't want to have to cut grass, plant flowers and do exterior maintenance. They would rather pay someone else to do it. That's why associations shouldn't put up with the deadbeats. Why should they have to pay for the deadbeat's blades of grass to be cut, and their roof to replaced, etc. :)

June 12, 2009 at 5:17 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

coolfreaknbeans (anonymous) says...

I would never live in a neighborhood without an association. We have one in our neighborhood and still have trashy people attempting to do trashy things. I, for one, have NO desire to live in a neighborhood with yard art, old cars, trailers and other crap all over.I want the value of my property protected. HOAs do not come free. Someone has to pay. You see neighbors buying elaborate landscaping yet are behind a year on the dues. Everyone wants the services, no one wants to pay. I'm happy to pay.

June 12, 2009 at 5:29 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.