Legislative panel backs $9.2M loan to save ship
By Allyson Bird
Previous story
Board seeking funds for Laffey, published 05/20/09
Patriots Point moved one nod closer to $9.2 million needed to save its sinking warship Laffey.
The Joint Bond Review Committee, a group of lawmakers that reviews state financial obligations, sent the attraction's request on to the state Budget and Control Board. But the committee issued a caveat: In order for Patriots Point to receive the loan, officials would have to submit in writing how they intend to repay it.
Patriots Point Development Authority Chairman John Hagerty said the attraction responded to that request by detailing federal funding it hopes to receive next year. U.S. Rep Henry Brown, R-S.C., requested $20 million for Patriots Point, a move supported by U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.
"We'll be looking for more," Hagerty said. "We're looking for money and any source we can find it."
He called the bond review committee's approval "a good beginning." Hagerty said the loan could allow Patriots Point to move the Laffey to dry dock for repairs by an August high tide that would provide enough leeway to move the ship without dredging.
Dubbed "The Ship That Would Not Die" for withstanding kamikaze attacks during World War II, the Laffey sprang more than 100 rusting leaks late last year. Unsure if she would survive a hurricane season, Patriots Point considered turning the destroyer into an artificial reef before learning that would cost almost as much as salvaging her.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, said the Laffey "is a monument to the generation that saved civilization, and it's got to be preserved."
But, he added, Patriots Point must first prove it has a plan — for both funding and maintenace of its entire fleet.
"It's got to be assured they're on the front of the curve regarding corrosion," McConnell said. "We can't be faced with, 10 to 15 years down the road, we've got them rusting again. We've got to know what's going on there before an emergency comes."
The Budget and Control Board will consider the request as early as June 16.
Reach Allyson Bird at 937-5594 or abird@postandcourier.com.
Comments
scmariner (anonymous) says...
We brought her into drydock in 93 I think and I questioned then why only 1/4" plating added to hull (in lieu of say 5/8") when you have her up, is time to put the $ in her.
June 5, 2009 at 3:30 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
DougHuffman (anonymous) says...
How will the Yorktown be treated? It would seem that the more valuable Yorktown is the larger risk in the likelihood of more significant problems and the cost of their amelioration.
June 5, 2009 at 6:43 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CHRISJIII (anonymous) says...
Patriots Point deserves to be preserved!!!!!
June 5, 2009 at 9:50 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
mlittle212 (anonymous) says...
pour more money down the toilet while teachers are laid off, roads crumble, and unemployment goes over 12%. genius!
June 5, 2009 at 11:35 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
wjhamilton3 (anonymous) says...
The cost of this is a brand now Elementary School or a Highway overpass from the ground up. The last hull repairs lasted less than 16 years. That is about 525 thousand dollars per year in major maintenance, plus all the other costs.
This is only a fraction of the work the ships need. The total income for Patriot's Point can't cover the cost of that work over the next 15 years.
Has anyone done a cost benefit analysis of this investment vs. other tourism, historical education infrastructure. Shouldn't we be putting money into the Navy for small, fast ship for drug interdiction or controlling piracy?
June 5, 2009 at 12:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
theronce (anonymous) says...
People haven't gotten to the point yet where they actually believe that the money pit is drying up. I do so honor the men and women that serve and have served. I prefer that any money go to them rather than to their tools. I'm sure that we can find a vet or two who could use a little jump start.
June 5, 2009 at 3:33 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- Off campus
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life

