Question of waste

With the decision to close the incinerator made, officials now must determine how to dispose of garbage

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, June 3, 2009


In the subdivisions next door to Charleston County's massive Bees Ferry Landfill, some residents say you wouldn't know a landfill is nearby because you can't see, hear or smell it.

photo

The Post and Courier

Contractors at Charleston County's Bees Ferry Landfill talk over their work. Closing the North Charleston incinerator means the county will rely more on the landfill for waste disposal.

In Union Heights in North Charleston, some residents say the opposite is true of the incinerator that burns most of the county's household garbage, and they were pleased Tuesday to see County Council finalize a decision to break off negotiations that could have extended the incinerator's use.

"We wanted to make sure that what they said would get done, got done," said Rahim Karriem, president of the Union Heights Community Council.

With an 8-0 vote (Councilman Victor Rawl was absent), the council reaffirmed that the incinerator's time has come, after 20 years. What to do with all that garbage remains an open question.

The county plans to quadruple the amount of waste that is recycled, to 40 percent, but has not determined how to do that. For the moment, the only place to take the roughly 212,000 tons of yearly household garbage that now goes to the incinerator will be the Bees Ferry Landfill.

The incinerator contract expires at the end of this year.

Sending the garbage to the landfill would mean a whole lot more trucks heading to West Ashley, from as far away as Awendaw.

Steve Yaeger lives in Grand Oaks Plantation, just north of the landfill property on Bees Ferry Road. He's not concerned about more noise or odors from the landfill because he isn't aware of any now. But more trucks are another matter.

"The one thing I do object to is the traffic, especially on Bees Ferry Road," he said.

But unlike residents in Union Heights, some in Grand Oaks Plantation and in Hunt Club, a subdivision on the south side of the landfill, see their neighborhood waste disposal facility as benign.

Fontaine Rickman said that because of the landfill, friends warned her against buying a home in Hunt Club. But she said you really wouldn't know it's there unless someone told you. And it's handy for people who need to get rid of things that can't be put into trash cans, such as empty paint cans.

"Actually, it's a convenience," she said.

Earlier this year, a consultant hired by the county, Mitch Kessler, recommended increasing the recycling goal and concluded that eliminating the incinerator would save the county $2 million yearly, but would cut the time before the landfill fills up to 14 years from 25.

County officials say they don't plan to simply ship all the garbage to Bees Ferry but have been vague about what the county might do instead.

The county's official response last week was this: "Charleston County staff and its consultant (Kessler) continue to evaluate all options for recycling and waste disposal available to us at this time, as well as new and emerging technologies and regional efforts."

Councilwoman Colleen Condon said Friday that some of the options the county is considering could be in place before the incinerator closes.

Money could be an issue.

photo

The Post and Courier

The North Charleston incinerator. The Charleston County Council has reaffirmed its decision to discontinue burning garbage at the facility.

Kessler said the county could boost its recycling rate from 10 percent to 20 percent simply by composting all of the yard waste that's taken the landfill. However, plans to expand the composting facility were sidelined during the past year because of county budget constraints.

The company that runs the incinerator is expected to be an active player in the ongoing discussion, despite the vote to stop negotiating over the incinerator itself.

Montenay, the incinerator operator, is a subsidiary of Veolia Environmental Services, the world's second largest waste management company. The company could end up offering proposals to the county for landfill operations and recycling, according to Lee Bazzle, manager of the incinerator (which Montenay calls a waste-to-energy recycling facility).

Bazzle was the only person to address council Tuesday after the incinerator vote. He said the county's process for deciding how to handle household waste has been unfocused, and he urged council members to decide what they want so that his company might bid.

Bazzle also cautioned the county about embracing unproven technologies.

After the meeting, Union Heights residents who had looked on were cautiously optimistic that the vote will truly mean the end of the incinerator and the garbage trucks through their neighborhood.

Coakley Hilton of the Lowcountry Alliance for Model Communities said the next thing will be working with the county to see what becomes of the county-owned land where the incinerator, owned by AT&T, now sits. Montenay had an option to buy the incinerator, which expired Monday.

In other business Tuesday, the council gave final approval to the county's $167.5 million budget for the year starting July 1. The budget does not include a tax increase.

Reach David Slade at 937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

BillytheKid (anonymous) says...

The reason they have to close the place is because it pollutes the air so bad. Now they have to hire a "consultant" to tell them what to do. I think all of them should be replaced by some new blood. I all ready know it will cost me a ton, but the fools that are running the place now just suck.

June 3, 2009 at 1:05 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

realamerican (anonymous) says...

How much you want to bet they just turn this land into a trash transfer station?

Wouldn't that be a slap in the face to those living in the neighborhoods around the incinerator

June 3, 2009 at 6:19 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

CMLMADDOG (anonymous) says...

Why not tear down the incinerator, and make that property a landfill?

June 3, 2009 at 7:42 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

KidYendor (anonymous) says...

What is wrong with the incinerator? Don't they have pollution control on the smoke? I have never seen it in operation so I don't know if smokes or stinks or whatever. For the sake of Union Heights complaining we have to get rid of it? I bet you North Charleston's Westvaco plant does much more stinking up the area than the incinerator. You want to close that down too all you complainers?

June 3, 2009 at 9:18 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

kiteboarder (anonymous) says...

West Ashley residents beware... your property values will now tumble. You will never be able to sell your homes near the landfill. Residents there haven't felt or smelled what it will be like when 100% of all of Charleston County's trash is dumped in West Trashley. The incinerator currently burns more than 70% of our trash -that's why residents don't smell it but they will when those stinky trash trucks look for shortcuts through neighborhoods West of the Ashley. Currently, the incinerator is in an industrial zone near the navy base -where it should be and not in a neighborhood.
The scary part is Charleston County councilmembers clearly don't have a plan. They don't have a clue but one thing is for sure it will cost us all millions of dollars more as council wears blindfolds trying to figure this out. We have a council with no leadership or vision. Thurmond, Condon, Pryor and Darby are the first who need to be replaced!!!

June 3, 2009 at 11:01 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

benjenjon (anonymous) says...

I live in The Hunt Club next to the landfill and we do smell it when they burn. Awful, and goes on for days!

June 3, 2009 at 11:07 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

UrGatorbait (anonymous) says...

The technology is out there to burn waste and toxic materials safely with no emissions and safe solid by-products. It appears no one wants to pay for it. It's more convenient to put off the issue and let some else figure it out. Some one in CC doesn't have a plan? Shocking, a politician doesn't have a clue.

Recycling should be mandatory in the US.

June 3, 2009 at 1:11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

R_U_Kidding_Me (anonymous) says...

Where is ZOOMRU?

June 3, 2009 at 1:32 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

zoomru (anonymous) says...

OH......I AM Here !!!

www.startech.net !!!!

Will this papaer.....E_D_U_C_A_T_E ....??????

Its one thing for Government to come in and tell a business how to run; BUT, it is a horse of a different color when the population is educated about all their CHOICES...!!!!

Recycling plus Plasma COnverters = NO LANDFILL !!!!!!

Educate YOURSELF....!!!!!

June 3, 2009 at 2:20 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

TrashMan (anonymous) says...

to zoomru, plasma converters have failed horribly on a scale needed to handle the amount of trash we are talking about.
to billythekid, the incinerator is at 60% below epa limits for emissions but i agree that new blood is needed.
to intrested parties, the fianance commitity and county council are the same people. no checks, no balance. WTF?

June 3, 2009 at 11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.





.Link.