Covers vs. fences for pools

Residents say new rule would boost aesthetics

By Prentiss Findlay
The Post and Courier
Saturday, July 25, 2009



MOUNT PLEASANT — Residents concerned about aesthetics have asked Town Council to allow them to take down safety fences and substitute locked pool covers to keep children from falling in and drowning.

As a result, council is considering changing its rule requiring the fences. Councilman Gary Santos said the proposed change increases the risk that kids who can't swim will be alone in a pool. "I spoke out against it, and I thought it was wrong because of the safety issue. I think this is a critical issue."

Currently, the town requires a 4-foot-tall fence with an automatic-latching gate around a swimming pool. Some pool owners asked if there wasn't a more attractive alternative, prompting council to consider the issue and vote for preliminary approval of the change allowing pool covers instead of fences.

"A lot of people have told me, 'I don't want it (fence) because it will block my view of the creek,' " said Lee Cave, the town division chief of building inspections. "It gives them an option of not having to have an unsightly fence."

The change in rules governing swimming pool safety would bring the town in line with state law on the issue. Instead of a fence, a pool owner could install a mechanically operated, locking safety cover that meets accepted standards, Cave said.

"You can physically walk over the things. When it's closed, it provides absolute protection. There's no way to get in the pool. It leaves it up to the homeowner to secure the pool," he said.

Santos said that because it's left up to owners to cover the pool, the new approach to swimming-pool safety is flawed. "How many people are going to cover the pool when they get out after swimming?" he said.

Florida's Residential Swimming Pool Safety Act allows homeowners the option of installing a fence, a pool cover, automatically closing and locking devices on all entrances to the pool area or alarms on all doors and windows providing direct access from the home to the pool.

Town Council members Billy Swails, Joe Bustos and Santos are campaigning to be elected mayor in November. Swails and Bustos said they saw no problem with changing the rule to allow pool covers instead of fences.

Swails said the town faces more critical problems than the pool fence issue. "I'm not on the pool issue. I'm on the daily issues that matter to Mount Pleasant."

Bustos noted that a rule change allowing pool covers instead of fences would be done according to state code. "I think it's a matter of personal preference at this point."

Final approval of the pool fence rule change could be on the agenda for the Council meeting Aug. 11.

Children younger than 1 most often drown in bathtubs, buckets or toilets. For kids between 1 and 4 years old, most drownings occur in residential swimming pools.

Most young children who drown in pools were last seen in the home, had been out of sight less than five minutes and were in the care of one or both parents at the time, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Reach Prentiss Findlay at 937-5711 or pfindlay@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

NativeSon (anonymous) says...

You want a more attractive idea? Put up a decorative fence! Human life is more important than the view in your back yard!

In fact, you should be using both a gated fence and a locked cover. This is only common sense!

Get your head out of your self absorbed ideology and do the 'right' thing.

July 25, 2009 at 5:34 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

maeko (anonymous) says...

in some places it required that you have a privacy fence, not only to prevent accidental drowning, but also as a crime deterent. it is viewed as unsafe, as well as tacky, to have adults or children in bathing suits visible from the street. the thinking is that it attracts predators and voyeurists.

i can tell you that as a former property manager for large complexes, the incidents of peeping and voyeurism is alarming. we had to attend a southeastern conference on safety. throughout the region, regardless of upscale or low rent, it was a problem. you can find at least 1 peeper on any given night at an apt complex. at one place in TX, they were catching 2-3 peeping toms a night! i would have creepers at the pool at least a couple times a year.

so IMO, they should have privacy fences on steetside at the very least.

July 25, 2009 at 7:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

shoelaces (anonymous) says...

You have got to be kidding me????

I don't have a pool. If I did I would want a fence and whatever else I could use to protect my child and others. It seems to me that a pool cover would be less attractive than a fence.

Are these people using wooden fences? Are they using chain link? Yes, those are ugly. Our neighborhood does not allow either. And when people do fence in their pools they also have to landscape the fence to soften its view from the rest of us.

There are some beautiful fake iron fences that do not obstruct snobby views.

July 25, 2009 at 8:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

billtom (anonymous) says...

A pool cover is not going to stop drownings. You can drown in an inch of water. How much water collects on top of a pool cover after a rain?

July 25, 2009 at 10:05 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

commonsence (anonymous) says...

MP Planning Commission already voted to deny the change based on the safety issue.

July 25, 2009 at 10:53 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links