Local leaders eager to pilot aerospace growth

By Katy Stech
The Post and Courier
Sunday, July 12, 2009



Previous stories

Boeing: In for a landing, published 07/08/09

Boeing decision hinges on contract, published 07/09/09

This could be Charleston's chance.

With Boeing Co. buying Vought's North Charleston manufacturing plant, local business leaders and elected officials statewide see a golden opportunity to bulk up the Lowcountry's budding aerospace industry and restore economic health to what many experts say is one of the recession's hardest-hit states.

In light of waning port business, a crippled real estate industry and an outward trickle of bread-and-butter manufacturing jobs over the past decade, this could be the Lowcountry's shot at becoming another hub of aerospace innovation, joining the ranks of Kansas and Dallas.

Washington's business leaders already have rallied to save their state's aerospace industry and its roughly 650 aviation-related companies, acknowledging the threat that Charleston poses with its business-friendly atmosphere, lower wages and weaker union base.

Boeing's purchase, a $580 million deal with an additional $422 million in forgiveness of previous cash advances, was seen by some in the aviation industry as a precursor to

Charleston landing an additional Boeing facility.

Parts for the passenger jet are being manufactured on every continent except Antarctica, then flown to Boeing's assembly plant in Everett, Wash. But some aviation analysts predict that the company will need a second location where workers can get the delayed plane back on schedule.

Even though Boeing has enough room to accommodate that need in Washington state, some say Charleston has a good chance of becoming the East Coast's only major commercial airplane manufacturing hub.

Crystal ball

Washington-based aviation consultant Scott Hamilton sees how it could evolve.

It would start with Boeing officials' decision to build a multimillion dollar facility to house a second Dreamliner assembly line. A handful of key suppliers would need to open their own Lowcountry operations to support that assembly work. Other suppliers could follow Boeing's lead, choosing to locate production lines or support workers in the Charleston region.

As Boeing grows comfortable with the area, Charleston could contend to land new production facilities for Boeing's soon-to-be-replaced 737 and 777 models. Both airplane production lines likely will need to be running by 2020, and Hamilton predicts that Boeing will locate that work outside the Seattle area.

"This could be a multidecade evolution, but that's how these things work," said Hamilton, who identified San Antonio, Texas, and Long Beach, Calif., as communities also in the running for the second assembly line.

Charleston area business leaders see aerospace as a natural fit for the local economy. A 2005 report listed the aerospace cluster as one of five industry groups that South Carolina should target.

Though Charleston is home to only a handful of aerospace companies, S.C. officials have tried to lure more by offering state-paid training and lobbying resources, said Karen Kuchenbecker of the Charleston Regional Development Alliance, a business-recruitment group.

Growing an economy through the cluster strategy can help a region push forward an entire industry through competition, research and innovation, explained George Fletcher, executive director of competitive growth group New Carolina.

"Think computers in Silicon Valley, movies in Hollywood, autos in Detroit, steel in Pittsburgh," he said.

Call to arms

The Washington state business community knows that Charleston could poach some of its long-standing aerospace work.

A report released earlier this year by the Economic Development Council of Snohomish County pinpoints the Charleston area as a top competitor for aerospace companies, in addition to San Antonio, Wichita, Kan., and Kinston, N.C.

It showed that the average machinist in the Seattle suburb of Everett makes $8,000 more each year than what Charleston pays. Water rates, land prices and electricity costs also come in far below Evergreen State levels.

Boeing's announcement last week sent shock waves through Seattle's business community, which has rallied around saving its aerospace industry.

"This is not a time for hand-wringing, blame or regrets. It's a time for us to buckle down, roll up our sleeves and show that Washington state is determined to remain the aerospace capital of the world," the Washington Aerospace Partnership, a recently created coalition, wrote in response to Boeing's purchase.

While Boeing officials often have looked to locate beyond Puget Sound, the company ultimately has shifted little outside the region. Hamilton, the analyst, noted that founder Bill Boeing told Seattle leaders he would move the company if they didn't build him an airport. Seattle leaders did and even named a portion after him.

"We're pretty used to people trying to take away our companies and our jobs because they're good companies and good jobs," said Bill McSherry, who advises Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire on aviation matters.

Seeing other communities nip at the heels of their aerospace industry, Washington state lawmakers passed $3 billion in tax breaks in 2003 for commercial airplane manufacturers.

That package led Boeing officials to commit to building the 787 in Washington. In South Carolina, such state incentive money also flows freely. Top commerce officials already have visited with Boeing officials at their newly purchased plant, namely to celebrate the Vought deal, but they also likely lobbied for the second 787 production line.

In a statement widely circulated around Washington business circles, Gov. Mark Sanford said his team is willing to do "whatever we can to help Boeing succeed and grow in our state."

Looking ahead

Boeing, which has started evaluating sites for its second line, is expected to make a final decision within six months. Hamilton said he doesn't see earlier production glitches at the Vought-run facility as a deal killer.

The supply-chain problems that long have delayed the 787 airplane's first flight were spread among several companies, he said. Boeing has taken heat for setting up such an ambitious and complicated system without proper oversight.

"There is blame enough and weakness enough to go around for everybody," Hamilton said.

Meanwhile, local officials are likely to get serious about the expensive task of extending the runways at Charleston International Airport.

Economic-development groups have complained that Charleston has been overlooked for competitive aerospace projects because the landing strips aren't long enough. They estimate that a runway of 10,000 feet or more is almost essential to attract another major aircraft manufacturer.

The two runways shared by Charleston International and the Charleston Air Force Base measure 7,000 and 9,000 feet.

Focusing on now

Even if Boeing's purchase last week marks its only investment in the Charleston area, the region still stands to benefit. The Chicago-based company has proven to be a great corporate citizen in other locations, said Barry Waldman, spokesman for Trident United Way.

"Boeing happens to be a company that believes in philanthropy," said Waldman, who estimates that Boeing employees nationally contribute $30 million each year to United Way's campaign.

Simply being able to add Boeing to the region's lineup of recognizable corporate citizens, such as Google, Robert Bosch and Daimler AG, will make it easier to attract new companies in all industry sectors.

"It's good for us as a region, promotion-wise," Dorchester County Economic Development Director Jon Baggett said. "If one's here, it shows others the viability of doing business here."

It also circulates Charleston's name among top executive circles.

"Companies, especially large companies, keep an eye on what their peers are doing," said John Krug, a Charlotte consultant who advises companies on where to locate. "There is a comfort in knowing that a peer company or any large company did due diligence on a community ... and came to the conclusion that that's where they need to be."

Reach Katy Stech at kstech@postandcourier.com or 937-5549.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

Rocks66 (anonymous) says...

"...some say...", "...could become...", "...would be...", "...joining the ranks of Kansas and Dallas."

More delusional spin from folks who should know better.

In Kansas, Cessna and Beech alone have manufactured over 200,000 aircraft. Dallas was a huge aircraft manufacturing center during the War and built thousands of heavy bombers. Even today, it is the hub and home to the corporate headquarters of the country's biggest airline, American, and American's maintenance facility is just up the road in Oklahoma. Even San Antonio, one of the rumored contenders, already has a broad-based aircraft manufacturing and repair industry.

Prior to Vought's arrival, the closest thing this area had to aircraft manufacturing was the Avco Lycoming plant, which made engines for the Huey helicopters that were then in huge demand for the Vietnam War.

Is it realistic to think that Boeing would bypass these established and experienced cities, who, by the way, already have a seasoned aircraft labor pool, to locate here, merely because we have "Right to Work" and the "Quality of Life" is so good?

Many of these "it could happen" and "what if" folks are the very people who should have been preparing for this "opportunity" years ago, instead of relying on tourism, etc., all the while hoping that one day we'd win the "Industrial Relocation Lottery". The main reason the upstate landed the BMW facility was that the folks in Greenville-Spartanburg had their act together.

And "...Hamilton doesn't see earlier (Charleston) production glitches as a deal breaker..." Are you kidding me? How many 'second chances" does he think a manufacturing center gets when it comes to making something as complex as an airliner, especially when those "glitches" have created major delays (and marketing losses) for the aircraft's introduction? Couple that with a public school system that ranks at or near the very bottom in the country and a port facility who's lunch is being eaten by Savannah and Norfolk, and what is there to recommend this area?

"...becoming the East Coast's only major commercial airline manufacturing hub..."? Right. Not until the Charleston Regional Development Alliance
learns to do their homework.

BTW, the Wall Street Journal covered the Vought acquisition this week, and no mention was made of anything even close to what's being suggested here.

Raising false hopes for people who are already suffering, based on the speculations and ruminations of a handful of pundits who are, at best, on the periphery of this situation, is reprehensible.

July 12, 2009 at 2:04 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

a_set_love (anonymous) says...

Ah, lets see now... In such a small story I read that the new Boeing ( ex- Vought ) plant is located in Charleston, North Charleston and the Charleston Area. Isn't it amazing that a writer can drift through so much pretense in a feel good article.

Oh, by the way, where is it really located? You have, according to the story, three guesses.

July 12, 2009 at 7:34 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

10216340 (anonymous) says...

No, we don't have healthcare for all the poor.....only for those who really need it (and in that group are also a percentage of those that don't deserve it as well but that is another story). I am not in favor of nationalized healthcare or a government run healthcare program of any kind.

Geez......can we honestly say that the government can do it better than private industry. Everytime they get their hands on something they screw it up. I am also not in favor of taking more of my money and using it to support those who should be supporting themselves. And yes, I know that a lot of people do work and don't get health insurance through their employer....well, find a different job than....one that does provide health benefits.

I grew up dirt poor so I know that it is not an easy road to hoe but I also am sick and tired of the growing amount of $$$ that are taken from me to support many that I personally see and know are able to work but choose not to.

Healthcare is not a right by any means.

July 12, 2009 at 8:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Neponset (anonymous) says...

I think we flogged this horse to death yesterday. We have two camps: one thinks it is doable and the other has so much contempt for the low country that they will say anything to discourage thoughts of this plant being built here. Who are the folks in this second group - disgruntled locals, trolls and/or folks from elsewhere?
Rock
Your post is too long - do you think anyone is going to read the whole thing?

July 12, 2009 at 8:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

10216340 (anonymous) says...

P & C....nice article. Now, how about the other side since this is such a touchy feely little piece.

July 12, 2009 at 8:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

10216340 (anonymous) says...

Sorry....my two comments where meant for the article on healthcare with Clybourn. I was reading that article and posted a comment to it but somehow when I pit "post" the comments came here.

What's the problem P & C.

July 12, 2009 at 8:34 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

dawhetsell (anonymous) says...

I see the Green Shoots of Recovery already. The stimlsus funds are going to let people bowwow money to get their jobs back and the people will start borrowing more to take plane trips, build new houses, borrow money for their children collage, eat at big restaurants again. They say this will happen when they get the NEXT stimlsus plan passed. The first one is not enought for the banks to pay all the bonuses . If they had enough money to do that, then they could loan money to people not working and help spend our way out of debt.

July 12, 2009 at 8:50 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

wjhamilton3 (anonymous) says...

The state of Washington, with a vastly larger economy and higher wage levels, had to spend 100s of millions of dollars in outright subsidies to get the last Boeing plant. A bidding war for lower wages and tax subsidies between our state and Washington state will be very expensive. Since labor isn't that huge a component, most of the competition will be in the area of tax breaks, tax subsidies, state provided training and other aid. These costs will have to be made up from other parts of a much smaller state economy.

It's been estimated that Alabama will never make back what the Mercedes Benz plant cost them, an uncoordinated race to the bottom that's full cost only became apparent after it was over. Agencies all made promises and noone kept a running count. The people promising tax cuts, didn't know about the people promising free road and parking lot construction or the people promising free job training.

With a desperate economic situation and a decapitated government led by an utterly distracted Governor, we're set up to make huge mistakes unless a coordinated effort with someone keeping their eye on total cost is in charge.

July 12, 2009 at 12:42 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

WhyDoIBother (anonymous) says...

So many "experts", so little time.

July 12, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JD_Simms (anonymous) says...

Rocks66 Excellent counterpoint analysis of the issue. Very well written also.

As an aside, I have to say that I'm baffled whenever I see comments from someone on the board who thinks another's post is "too long". I've seen this happen on more than a few occasions here. The more thought out and articulated the post is the more prone it seems to become at drawing such a comment. It makes me wonder if we will next be seeing complaints about someone using words with more than two syllables! Complex issues require much more thought and analysis than the McNews sound bite world many dwell in and you, sir, have provided such. Bravo.

July 13, 2009 at 2:15 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links