City to develop up to 36 homes

By David Slade
The Post and Courier
Saturday, July 4, 2009



photo

The Post and Courier

These two houses on St. Philip Street are among the properties that Charleston owns. The city will redevelop the area with plans for up to 36 homes for rent or for sale to first-time buyers.

photo

A small block of St. Philip Street in Charleston, cradled by the King Street exit from southbound U.S. Highway 17, has been an eyesore for several years.

The houses that line one side of the short block below Carolina Street, and part of Fishburne Street behind a bar called The Recovery Room, are boarded up, and some have been damaged by arson fires.

On the other side of the St. Philip block is a crescent of vacant land, bordered by a highway off-ramp.

It is there, along both sides of St. Philip and part of Fishburne, that the city plans to develop up to 36 homes for rent or for sale to first-time buyers.

The houses there now weren't always vacant, but the state Department of Transportation purchased them in 2003 for the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge construction project. The state initially planned to tear the houses down, but preservationists complained, and the state ended up boarding them up instead.

Later they were turned over to the city as part of the state's bridge mitigation program, after the previous owners declined to repurchase the properties.

"A couple of them have been set on fire," said City Councilman James Lewis, who lives nearby. "It's an eyesore in the community."

The city acquired the rest of the vacant land adjacent to the highway off-ramp last month. The city agreed to pay Prime South Realty $175,000 for the 6,601 square feet of land, which an appraiser said was worth $225,000.

Prime South bought the land for $162,000 in 2006. Councilman Aubry Alexander voted against the purchase June 16, saying he thought the price was too high.

Now that the city controls all the land on both sides of St. Philip from Carolina Street to Fishburne Street, as well as part of Fishburne, the city plans to finish the details of a plan for redevelopment.

Geona Shaw Johnson, Charleston's director of the Department of Housing and Community Development, said the city had previously sought proposals to develop the land it already owned there, but had received no responses.

"Now, when redevelopment does happen, it can happen all in one blush," she said. "There is a concept. We have looked at 25 to 36 opportunities for home ownership and rental."

"Basically, it's just on paper right now."

Johnson said the city has not decided whether to redevelop the properties using city staff, as the city has sometimes done in the past at other sites, or bring in private sector partners.

In some cases, such as with the Concord Park redevelopment plan near the South Carolina Aquarium, the city has set out a vision for redevelopment, then solicited bids from developers willing to buy the land and develop it in accordance with the city's plans. With plans for affordable housing, the city often works with non-profit groups.

"I would say in the next 60 to 90 days there will be some movement, and we'll present our final strategy to the West Side community," Johnson said.

Reach David Slade at937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

moonpie (anonymous) says...

...."but preservationists complained" THEN LET THE PRESERVATIONIST SHOULD TAKE THEM OVER AND "SAVE" THEM. SOMETIMES OLD THINGS SHOULD JUST BE TORN DOWN.

July 4, 2009 at 8:18 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Reader (anonymous) says...

If some people can't see the value in those old houses, then let them buy them and demolish them.

July 4, 2009 at 12:25 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

WhyDoIBother (anonymous) says...

Once again the market SPEAKS. I hope that they don't expect people/families to live in these. The City is going to spend gobs of money and get very little return if any as residential. Rezone them office/retail or move them and sell the land when the market is right.

July 5, 2009 at 8:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links