Bessinger kidnapper's sentence reduced

The Post and Courier
Friday, July 3, 2009


A judge on Thursday cut 13 years from a 38-year sentence given to the former Bessinger Bar-B-Q manager who tied his boss to a chair and strapped a fake bomb to his arm at gunpoint in 2006.

photo

Priest

Circuit Judge Michelle Childs reduced her own 2007 sentence so that Charles Allan Priest, 52, will have to serve 25 years for kidnapping Tommy Bessinger Jr. on Feb. 16, 2006. Priest, who has already served three years of that sentence, would be eligible for parole when he's 70 years old.

Childs said she still finds that Priest committed "pre-meditated torture" but changed her sentence to reflect a medical evaluation that says he is a low risk to commit another crime as long as he avoids alcohol and drugs.

Afterward, family members on both sides expressed disappointment with the new sentence.

Ron Priest said his brother, a first-time offender who has been a model prisoner, would not have received such a long sentence had it not been a high-profile case involving a well-known victim.

"We're glad the judge reduced the sentence, but it still remains a life sentence," Ron Priest said. "There are people who have murdered people who will spend less time in prison than my brother."

Michael Bessinger, Tommy's brother and Priest's original target, said there's now a chance Priest could again seek vengeance against the family when he's released.

Previous story

Bessinger kidnapper sentenced to 38 years, published 05/09/07

"We're disappointed because of the chances of him of getting out at a relatively healthy age," Michael Bessinger said. "If the original sentence was kept, we would feel safe."

Childs said she reviewed all of the same evidence against Priest that she did after he pleaded guilty in 2007.

That included hours of video evidence and the note Priest left in his car that said, "Die if necessary. But kill all around first. Do not be taken alive."

Priest, who asked to address the Bessingers but was told to address the court, said he was very sorry for what he did to his former employers who took him in after a failed suicide attempt.

He said his life has changed in the three years he's been behind bars and that he's no longer dependent on drugs and alcohol, even though they're tacitly available.

"I guess if I could have one wish right now, it is that I could have forgiveness from the Bessingers," he said.

Priest's family said he pleaded guilty in 2007 because he didn't want the Bessingers to think he got away with something.

They said his attorney at the time convinced them he would receive five years, 10 at the most.

Priest said he wanted a reduced sentence to reflect the crime. His wife divorced him and he's had to miss funerals for both his father and brother while in prison.

"I lost my life and I didn't actually take a life," he said.

Ninth Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson argued that Bessinger survived because he tricked Priest and was able to get away.

Michael Bessinger said they do forgive Priest and they do believe people can change, "but we are not naive." Brother Greg Bessinger said, "I think he's where he belongs."

Reach Andy Paras at 937-5589 or aparas@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

bradsure (anonymous) says...

I guess we will soon see the family here saying how this guy just had a bad day and deserves another chance. Yea, another chance to drink a beer, cry, do some drugs and then finish his original plan. If he is a changed man and feels the guilt of the crime he committed, then he should accept the sentence he was given. Seems to me he plead guilty not to save the Bessinger family the grief of a longer trail but to accept a deal with the prosecution to get a 5 or 10 year deal. Sounds like he came from a great family. To me, he is murderer that is not very good at his trade. Hope he never gets another try.

July 3, 2009 at 7:47 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

WSM (anonymous) says...

"Ron Priest said his brother, a first-time offender who has been a model prisoner, would not have received such a long sentence had it not been a high-profile case involving a well-known victim."

"There are people who have murdered people who will spend less time in prison than my brother."

__________________________________

A model prisoner? Too bad he couldn't have been a model human being, eh?
After all, what's a little kidnapping and tourture, all in the eye of the beholder, right? It just depends on one perspective?

As for murderers getting "less time" than you rbrother, there are murderers getting the death penalty, too, drama king. The fact that he didn't _actually_ kill Bessinger would be a good thing in most peoples' minds. I would consider it to be great that Bessinger escaped from your kidnapper of a brother!

I love it when people try to justify the unjustifiable as "misunderstood," or just "had a bad day." Maybe someone should kidnap you for a few days, and see how you like it. Moron! Judging from your idiot convict brother, you were the "smart one" of the kids?

July 3, 2009 at 9:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

MC29461 (anonymous) says...

Circuit Judge Michelle Childs is the typical liberal judge who wants to make everyone feel good and does not have the backbone to enforce her original sentence.

The reduction of 13 years due to alcohol is just an excuse to go light on him because this dependency is a life-long problem and the prisoner's statement not to drink again after release is a hollow promise.

July 3, 2009 at 3:08 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

desspec (anonymous) says...

Wonder how the alcohol bit might affect the decision in the case of our Councilwoman ...

July 3, 2009 at 8:01 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

jlangus84 (anonymous) says...

Judge childs gave a meaningful rationale for her decision. Generalized terms as liberal/conservative have a destructive emotional charge. It has no relevance to this situation. The punishment seems to fit the crime, especially when Mr. Priest's age is taken into consideration. He probably toyed with the emotions of all concerned at the sentence review hearing. Given the victim's trauma, it is well nigh impossible to forget the heinous crime. Victim as well as convict got something from the review. Priest has a de facto life sentence. The twenty-five years will sound less onerous when repeated to relatives (children) than 38 years. Friends and foe should go forward gracefully. Could the judge's graciousness be reflective of the grace of God that we all cherish and adore?

July 5, 2009 at 8:52 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.