Setback for Force Protection

Armored vehicle company's stock dips 39% after it loses out on military contract

Staff and wire reports
Thursday, July 2, 2009


photo

File/AP

The Cheetah, a prototype of a lighter armored vehicle, is seen in October 2008 at Force Protection's plant in Ladson. Force Protection found out it did not win a Pentagon contract worth $1.06 billion to build blast-resistant off-road trucks for troops to use in Afghanistan.

Shares of armored-vehicle maker Force Protection Inc. fell sharply Wednesday on news that it was not picked for a Pentagon contract valued at more than $1 billion.

The company's stock plummeted 39 percent, or $3.46, to close at $5.38 in heavy trading volume.

Force Protection said in a statement it was disappointed by the Pentagon's decision announced late Tuesday. It also stressed that its growth prospects are not dependent on that deal.

Force Dynamics, a joint venture between the Ladson-based manufacturer and General Dynamics Corp., was among the three bidders that lost out on a $1.06 billion contract to build 2,244 blast-resistant off-road trucks for ground forces in Afghanistan.

The job went to Oshkosh Corp., which was the "clear winner," a top Marine Corps official said Wednesday. Any protests of the award likely will be defeated, the official said.

Oshkosh said it plans "to enter into discussions with other manufacturers to determine if they can assist" in the production of its all-terrain vehicle to ensure it meets the delivery schedule. The first new trucks will be in Afghanistan by the end of October, according to the Pentagon.

Force Protection spokesman Tommy Pruitt said Wednesday it was "too early for us to tell whether there will be work for us or anybody else."

Force Protection has teamed with its competitors on previous projects, but it has not built a vehicle designed by another manufacturer, Pruitt said.

"If there's an opportunity for Force Protection to participate we certainly stand ready, but that's up to the prime contractor," he said. 'I believe it's a little too early to speculate either way as to whether anybody will get work from Oshkosh aside from supply chain they've already put together for their submission."

The military has said it needs a lightweight armored vehicle to provide the same type of protection as the hulking mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles that have been widely used in Iraq. Many of those so-called MRAPs were built by Force Protection.

But the Pentagon has said the new fleet of trucks needed for Afghanistan must be far more agile, lighter and provide increased maneuverability to handle that country's rocky terrain. The new MRAPs are intended to replace Humvees.

In recent months, Force Dynamics had manufactured several models of its proposed vehicle as part of the Defense Department bidding process.

Michael Moody, chief executive officer of Force Protection, said in statement Wednesday the company was "disappointed to have not been selected" but that "our business planning and ability to continue to generate growth and value for our shareholders was not dependent upon winning" the contract.

"We remain very optimistic about the near and longer-term opportunities to grow our business and to serve our customers with a diverse array of urgently needed survivability solutions and total life-cycle support for our deployed fleet of vehicles," he said. "We are well-positioned to capture a variety of opportunities for service, support, spares, and training that exist with regard to our fleet of deployed vehicles."

In an e-mailed statement, Force Dynamics said it looks forward to meeting with the government to understand the specific decision points that led to the selection.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Nochaseboy (anonymous) says...

I hope Oshkosh runs Goodyear Tires. Force Protection did not. I just retired from the Goodyear plant here in Danville Va. We sure need the work. We built the MRAP tires, but not for Force Protection, but rather another company that also made the MRAP.

July 2, 2009 at 4:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BlackReign (anonymous) says...

good luck nochasboy, the pork-us-all-bill is crap, get ready for pork-us-all 2.

July 2 (Bloomberg) -- Employers in the U.S. cut 467,000 jobs in June, the unemployment rate rose and hourly earnings stagnated, offering little evidence the Obama administration's stimulus package is shoring up the labor market.

The payroll decline was more than forecast and followed a 322,000 drop in May, according to Labor Department figures released today in Washington. The jobless rate jumped to 9.5 percent, the highest since August 1983, from 9.4 percent.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pi...

Hope and Change!

July 2, 2009 at 12:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

BlackReign (anonymous) says...

The financial system is crashing and action must be taken by the US government to convert debt into equity to produce a more stable environment, Nassim Taleb, author of "The Black Swan," told CNBC Thursday.

"You may have green shoots, whatever you want to call them, you may have temporary relief, but you are still in a world that's breaking," Taleb said on "Squawk Box."

Anything that's fragile like the financial system will eventually crash, he said.

"We're in the middle of a crash," Taleb said. "So if I'm going to forecast something, it is that it's going to get worse, not better."

The government needs to deleverage debt and not try stimulus packages that will inflate assets, he said.

"What makes me very pessimistic in not seeing any leadership or awareness on parts of government on what has to be done, which is deleverage $40-to-$70 trillion," Taleb said.

"The monkey on our back is debt," he added.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31706523

July 2, 2009 at 12:46 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Nochaseboy (anonymous) says...

BlackReign, I totally agree with you. I hope all of those OBAMANITES are happy, with their GREAT ONE....

July 2, 2009 at 12:54 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.