Impact-fee bill passes in state Senate

By Dave Munday
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, January 28, 2009



SUMMERVILLE — A bill to make developers help pay for the cost of new schools around town made its way through the state Senate on Tuesday.

The legislation, written by Sen. Mike Rose, R-Summerville, would allow the Dorchester District 2 school board to impose impact fees on new houses to pay for schools to serve new residents.

"My bill gives the school district the authority to protect itself," Rose said. "Counties and cities have a financial incentive to keep approving houses. They have no financial incentive to consider schools."

Current state law does not allow impact fees to build schools.

District 2 residents have been urging a change in the law for years, as new houses have crowded schools.

Past efforts to change the law on impact fees have failed. Rose said his legislation passed because it applies only to District 2. State law doesn't allow legislation that affects only one municipality, but it allows laws that affect only school district, he said.

Sens. Larry Grooms, R-Bonneau, and John Matthews, D-Bowman, the other two local senators, also backed the bill.

District 2 includes North Charleston and Summerville as well as unincorporated areas of Dorchester County. Rose's bill says a certificate of occupancy for a new house can't be issued until the school district gets the impact fee.

The school board would determine how much that should be, Rose said.

The fees could used to build public schools or pay existing or new school bonds. They could not exceed what each new house would actually cost the district for schools.

Studies show that the district would need 15 new schools to serve the 15,000 houses that have already approved in the district, Rose said.

The bill must also pass the House. Since it is local legislation, Reps. Jenny Horne, R-Summerville; Patsy Knight, D-St. George; and Annette Young, R-Summerville, will determine its fate, Rose said.

The school board, inspired by Rose's bill but not specifically referencing it in a resolution, unanimously endorsed the concept of impact fees at its meeting Monday night.

Last week Rose got the Senate to pass another bill that requires the District 2 superintendent and the county and municipalities to keep each other informed how new neighborhoods would affect schools. The school board endorsed that bill Monday.

Dorchester County Council Chairman Jamie Feltner said he will introduce a resolution at Monday's council meeting asking council to endorse both bills.

"Citizens have said time and time again they don't want to pay for the infrastructure for new people," Feltner said.

Reach Dave Munday at 937-5553 or dmunday@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

tc1 (anonymous) says...

This should be implemented statewide. Sen. Grooms get this for our Berkely county. I totaly support the recent property tax reforms. But, that shouldn't have meant leaving the schools high and dry or the government taking my home by taxation. The developers and realters walk off with the profits on huge developments leaving the true cost to everyone else.

January 28, 2009 at 9:56 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

wjhamilton3 (anonymous) says...

The problem is that systems like this end up putting all the school investment on the suburban fringe, which drives sprawl. Older schools get neglected, their areas decline and enrollment falls off. People move out to where the "good" schools are, which means you have to spend more money.

Most new development never pays its way in taxes. It's not dense enough and consumes too much in government services in infrastructure.

This will raise the price of housing for young families, the type of stable, committed labor force employers desire. Without them investment will look elsewhere for location. We'll end up dependent on an aging population full of retired people who now, unlike a generation ago, face declining income from failed investments. Florida has that problem now and it's not pretty when thousands of people in their 80s need care and assistance and their families live far away. Often they have no living children.

We really have to think about the long term consequences of our housing and development policies.

It's bizarre that Charleston County is closing schools while Dorchester is building them. This is the high cost of sprawl. The entire region would have been better off if the Charleston Schools had maintained their enrollments and the huge areas around Summerville were still woods.

January 28, 2009 at 10:19 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.