Toal says cuts straining courts
COLUMBIA — South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal said Tuesday the state's court system is at the end of its rope with budget cuts as she called on House budget writers to spare the third branch of state government from deeper cuts.
The recession and sagging tax collections have taken $1 billion from state agency budgets since July, and budget writers have told agencies to come up with plans for more.
Toal said she'd have to rely more on fines and fees to pay salaries and other expenses for the $60 million court system's budget.
"We're about at the end of our rope," Toal said. "We are not a large financial part of the picture. But we're the third branch of government and we're a huge part of the safety and security of South Carolina citizens."
Toal is continuing to cut spending. Tuesday she sent letters to judges telling them to restrict travel. She's done the same with court reporters and law clerks.
"I have announced this week that the judges' office allowance will be cut in half," Toal said.
So far, a hiring freeze has headed off court furloughs.
Meanwhile, Toal's branch of government now relies on fees and fines more and more to operate.
When Toal took over as chief justice in the 2001 fiscal year, the $46.6 million budget depended only on $66,575 in fees and fines. Toal said she's scrambling to operate the court system now with $15 million in fines and fees and $5.5 million in federal grants.
E-mail this story 
Printer-friendly version
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Comments
This article has 3 comment(s)
Posted by lillycollette on January 14, 2009 at 3:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I would like to see some serious reorganization in our judiciary. However, I have ZERO expectations on that.
(Keep doing what ya did -- keep getting what ya got.)
Posted by AFWally on January 14, 2009 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmmmmm......we need more fees and fines to operate, I smell a skunk.....so what next have the taxpayer pick up the tab? We are getting quite tired of picking up the tab on all this bullsheet......fire some judges and court workers for starters, to bad, thats what the rest of us have to endure.
Posted by lillycollette on January 15, 2009 at 6:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes -- Ms. -- Toal the judiciary is a “huge part of the safety and security of South Carolina citizens”—and they have shamelessly failed in that duty. Knowing what I do I would not simply cut your budget—I would throw it into a Vegematic (mincing machine).
It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. Perhaps having the same level of impoverishment visited upon the judiciary that they have inflicted upon innocent people would humble them back to their original purpose. LOL on that one.