Incinerator improvements hinge on contract renewal
The company that's been running Charleston County's trash incinerator for nearly 20 years says it plans to improve the facility if its contract is extended.
Montenay Charleston Resource Recovery will put in place better air- pollution controls and purchase a new generator that would produce more power if it continues operating the incinerator beyond 2010, facility manger Lee Bazzle said.
FILE/STAFF
The company that has been running Charleston County's trash incinerator for nearly 20 years says it would like to put in place better air pollution controls and purchase a new generator that would produce more power.
Charleston County is in the process of creating a plan for how it will handle its trash for the next 20 to 30 years. That process, which will be completed later this year, will include a decision on whether to extend Montenay's contract to run the incinerator, where 70 percent of the county's household waste is burned. If the contract isn't extended, more trash will go the Bees Ferry Landfill and it will be full by 2024, six years earlier than if the incinerator remains open.
The county is considering extending Montenay's contract despite strong opposition from predominantly black North Charleston neighborhood groups that say residents are tired of the facility's ash, stench and health risks.
Bazzle bristles at the facility being called an incinerator, referring to it instead as a waste-to-energy facility. That's not just a euphemism, he said, because the trash that's burned is converted to enough electric power to run 7,000 to 10,000 homes.
The county sells the energy the facility produces to Progress Energy, Bazzle said. But the generator in the facility is not large enough to convert to energy all of the steam produced from burning the trash. The facility, which opened in 1989, was originally designed to produce power and transfer some steam to the former Navy Base, which sits near the facility in North Charleston.
Previous stories
Union Heights residents want incinerator out of their area, published 07/13/08
Home offers too low, residents say, published 01/03/09
The base closed in 1995, but the Navy is still paying the county about $5 million per year to purchase steam because it signed a 20-year contract when the facility opened, Gregg Varner, Charleston County solid waste director said.
The Navy simply vents the steam into the air, Bazzle said, because it has no use for it since the base closed.
Varner said Wednesday that he needed more time to provide information on how much the county pays Montenay to run the facility and how much it brings in by selling the energy it produces.
But, he said that even with a larger generator, "the sum total of energy revenue will go down some" without the Navy steam contract.
Bazzle said he thinks the incinerator is often blamed for much more than its share of the air pollution in the heavily industrial Charleston Neck Area. "There's a perception in the neighborhood that we're the culprit for many things we're not the cause of," he said.
But he admits that such a facility brings noise and odor from many trash trucks rumbling through nearby neighborhoods. And, he said, "I sympathize with Howard Heights," the neighborhood closest to the facility.
But, he said, Montenay monitors the air 24 hours a day, and the Environmental Protection Agency says the facility is more environmentally friendly than a landfill.
Varner said the decision on whether to continue using the facility will fall to County Council.
North Charleston Councilman Teddie Pryor said, "I'm definitely in favor of closing the incinerator. The people have suffered for 20 long years." Council had decided last year to close the facility in 2010, he said, but then decided instead to take an overall look at trash disposal and create a long-term plan.
He said he's certain that there are other council members opposed to extending the contract for the incinerator. But he's not sure whether the majority is opposed.
Bazzle said the waste-to-energy industry "had its heyday in the 1980s but there's been a recent resurgence." In Europe, he said, there's been an explosion of such facilities.
He contends that with an improved air pollution system that prevents more particles from being released into the air, the facility is safer than a landfill.
"I bring my 3-year-old son to work with me twice a week," he said.
Reach Diane Knich at dknich@postandcourier.com or 937-5491.


Comments
karmann (anonymous) says...
How about letting the incinerator operate and pay for the electricity of those who live near by as compensation? Would that not make more sense than allowing that unused energy go to waste. I am sure there are better ways to incinerate waste and get a positive by-product to help the community by suppling needed energy and ridding us of waste w/o more landfills.
January 8, 2009 at 7:02 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
majorjohnson (anonymous) says...
The unused energy is steam. They have much more steam than they can turn into electricity with the generators they currently have. Actually your entire post makes very little sense, but fear not. Zoomru and jimislander will soon come along and once they've posted your post will seem very intelligent by comparison.
January 8, 2009 at 7:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
kiteboarder (anonymous) says...
It's pretty cool how they turn trash into energy and Charleston county gets the cash from selling the electricity. Burning trash sounds a whole better better than putting it in the backyards of people's homes at the Bees Ferry landfill.
January 8, 2009 at 12:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
So long ....incinerator !!
Hello....PLASMA !!
Mr. Bazzle....don't you want to be able to tell your three year OLD son that you helped CLOSE all landfills in the entire STATE !!!! Come on.....I know you have heard of PLASMA like MajorJohnson....!!!!!
Learn at www.startech.net !!!!!
January 8, 2009 at 4:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
burton (anonymous) says...
Talk about our tax paying money going to waste! How about the Navy still paying $5 million to the county for steam that they just vent in the air since the base closed in 1995. Hey Navy, did you try to renegotiate the contract or get rid of it entirely? Wow! This is a BIG waste of money!
As far as this "waste-to-energy" facility. 20 years is enough! It's time to close this facility and look at other options that many of the cities across the country have gone too.
January 8, 2009 at 7:05 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
pacomarj (anonymous) says...
"Waste-to-energy" is better than waste in the ground. Waste has to go somewhere and it makes more since to burn it and create energy or steam, than to let it become toxic in the ground. That is the reason it's gaining in popularity again. Charleston County could work on better recycling facilities which would help get rid of so much trash.
January 8, 2009 at 7:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.