Tigers eye leadership, playmakers

The Post and Courier
Monday, January 5, 2009


Clemson coach Dabo Swinney brought a renewed enthusiasm to the Clemson football program since taking over in October.

Jeff Blake
MCT

Clemson coach Dabo Swinney brought a renewed enthusiasm to the Clemson football program since taking over in October.

Dabo Swinney

Dabo Swinney

There's little doubt that head coach Dabo Swinney brought a renewed enthusiasm to the Clemson football program since taking over in October.

But emotion can only take a team so far.

If the Tigers are going to win their first Atlantic Coast Conference title since 1991, or even get to the ACC's championship game next season, Swinney and the Tigers will have to answer these five questions:

1. Who will be the offensive and defensive coordinators for the Tigers?

Alabama assistant coach Kevin Steele is expected to be named the Tigers defensive coordinator any day now.

The Dillon native was most recently the associate head coach/head defensive coach for the Crimson Tide, but Kirby Smart was listed as the defensive coordinator and was calling the plays on game day.

Steele, who had a stint as a linebackers coach with the Carolina Panthers, might be best remembered for his near fight with Panthers defensive end Kevin Greene on the sidelines during his last season in Charlotte.

Steele is a a top-notch recruiter and is expected to be more aggressive than his predecessor, Vic Koenning, who played more zone and blitzed less than Swinney cared for.

Maybe the biggest question is who

will call the offensive plays next season?

Will Swinney and quarterbacks coach Billy Napier continue to call plays like they did in the final seven games of this season or will Swinney go out and get a big name offensive coordinator?

Woody McCorvey is already in place as the Director of Football Operations. Swinney has called McCorvey, his old position coach at Alabama, his "national security advisor." McCorvey was Mississippi State's offensive coordinator and the Crimson Tide's offensive coordinator in 1996, but that's nothing to brag about.

To hire McCovey, Swinney would have to fire one current assistant coach and as he said in December no coach is "guaranteed a job" once the bowl season is over.

2. Who will be the Tigers' playmakers in 2009?

Here's who we know are for sure leaving Clemson: Running back James Davis, the Tigers' second all-time leading rusher; Aaron Kelly, the ACC's all-time leading receiver; quarterback Cullen Harper, who threw for 5,700 yards and 42 TDs during his career; wide receiver Tyler Grisham, who finished with more than 130 career receptions; and safety Michael Hamlin, who had 18 takeaways, second most in Clemson history behind Terry Kinard.

That's a lot of weapons gone from the Clemson arsenal in 2009.

If running back C.J. Spiller and wide receiver Jacoby Ford jump to the NFL, that's 88 percent of the Tigers' offense gone from the lineup next season.

Rising sophomore running back Jamie Harper and Andre Ellington, a former Berkeley High School star, are expected to be the 2009 version of 'Thunder and Lightning,' but that's a lot of offense to make up for.

3. Will the Tigers' offensive line get tougher in 2009?

One of the biggest criticisms during the Tommy Bowden era had been the Tigers' toughness along the offensive line.

Against top-notch defensive fronts, the Tigers have been unable to run the ball with any consistency. Take away the sacks against Nebraska and the Tigers still only got 43 rushing yards from Davis and Spiller.

Having all the skill guys in the world won't help if there are no holes to run through.

The Tigers return four starters on the offensive line in 2009, so experience shouldn't be a factor.

Adding offensive tackle/tight end coach Dan Pearman should help Brad Scott and the offensive line get some toughness.

4. Can the Tigers get a respectable recruiting class in February?

The Tigers were off to a great recruiting class at the beginning of the season. But with Bowden's departure and the uncertain future of Swinney, most recruits have had a wait-and-see approach since October.

Swinney and Napier hope to sign 19-21 in this class with needs at just about every position.

Right now the Tigers have 10 verbal commitments with two or three on the way in the next week.

The Tigers picked up a huge verbal commitment after the Army All-American Bowl when wide receiver Bryce McNeal said he would attend Clemson in the fall.

Still, as of Sunday, the Tigers have the 33rd-ranked class nationally, so there's plenty of work to be done.

5. Who will be the starting quarterback in 2009?

The forgone conclusion has always been that Willy Korn is the heir apparent to take over for Harper.

Not so fast.

But by all accounts, freshman Kyle Parker, a star on the Tigers baseball team, has been pretty impressive on the scout team this fall.

Korn actually got his first career start against Georgia Tech in Swinney's first game as interim head coach.

But Korn had lingering shoulder issues and at times looked overmatched against Georgia Tech and Florida State when he was on the field. Korn had surgery on his shoulder after the South Carolina game and was throwing the ball better during Gator Bowl practice.

Parker has the better arm, while Korn has better mobility, which should make this spring practice very interesting.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  11 comment(s)

Posted by softbatch on January 5, 2009 at 9:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

A lot will hinge on Spiller, if he comes back, the offense will obviously revolve around him. If he jumps, all bets are off and someone(s) will need to step up in a big way. But hey, at least we're not as bad off as the chickens. 220+ days before kickoff, Go Tigers!



Posted by uscsax on January 5, 2009 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Good theory softbatch.



Posted by theronce on January 5, 2009 at 12:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You never know until the season is over what you have. Look at the Alabama meltdown.



Posted by sbs920 on January 5, 2009 at 1:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If Spiller stays, they better treat him for orange kool-aid overdose. He would be a fool to stay at CU for another year, his stock is high, would do well if he attends the combines and would go in the 1st round of the NFL draft.
Why risk getting injured?



Posted by fantasy5 on January 5, 2009 at 4:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

SBS, maybe so he can beat up on that coot arse one more time!Seriously though, I agree that he may benefit financially by going pro this year, but that is definitely a risk as there are a few other backs that would probably go before him, and everyone knows that only the first few picks in the 1st round make the serious loot via a signing bonus. If he comes back and plays his senior year he gets his degree and potentially improves his draft status and signing bonus. Your argument about getting hurt is valid, but he's just as likely to get hurt in a freak accident walking down the street as he is on the football field. He may value his education and earn a degree that would benefit him down the road if he didn't make it long in the pro's or even got hurt early on in his career. Also, if he came back he would definitely take out an insurance policy on himself, which I know doesn't even hold a candle to what he could potentially make as a pro, but more than likely any injury he might suffer wouldn't be career ending. I know the majority of your junior coots don't understand the value of an education, but I wouldn't expect them to nor do I blame them for wanting to get out of Cola., the place sucks...



Posted by fantasy5 on January 5, 2009 at 4:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Also, thanks for reading and posting on the Clemson article, we love that you wish you were a Tiger fan, but not everybody can be a fan of the winning team...



Posted by softbatch on January 5, 2009 at 4:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

He may not even be in the top 5 RBs this year depending on who comes out. Moreno, Wells, and Greene are probably ahead of him. The UCONN kid said he is coming out, although not sure he'd be picked ahead of Spiller. I'm sure there are a few i'm forgetting. Maybe i'm being a little slanted but I think he should come back, be the featured guy and lock up a top 10 pick in 2010.



Posted by tigerama on January 5, 2009 at 6:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Spiller - in a draft year which does not have a great need for running backs, Spiller is around the 6th RB in most mock drafts. That is mid 2nd round to early third. He has not demonstrated that he can be an every down back yet and really needs to stay one more year. As the main back in 2009, he would get at least 40 touches including passes. He also is a good student and pulled a 3.8 gpa last semester, thus education is important. Unless a sure 1st round pick best to stay in. Ford is a 4th round or beyond pick - Should stay unless his academics are in trouble like some of the USC players.



Posted by uscsax on January 6, 2009 at 8:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You all have to remember that Chris Johnson was supposed to be a mid 3rd round pick until he blew up the combine.



Posted by fantasy5 on January 6, 2009 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yet again, still a risk uscsax, and it goes back to geting that degree and getting better on the football field.



Posted by sbs920 on January 6, 2009 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Just proves you CU'ers don't have a clue!

do any of those backs mentioned above have the speed that Spiller has. How many of them return punts? How many of them can catch as well as Spiller does out of the backfield and lined up as a receiver! none. . .

Spiller is easily a 1st rounder!

wake up and quit drinking so much orange kool-aid