Sanford comes through on state jobless benefits

Monday, January 5, 2009



photo

AP

Gov. Mark Sanford, speaking to reporters on Dec. 31, announced that day he would request a $146 million federal loan so that the 77,000 jobless residents in South Carolina can continue receiving unemployment benefits.

More than 70,000 out-of-work South Carolinians caught up in a fight between the governor and the Employment Security Commission were relieved when the state's chief executive agreed to an 11th-hour action that continues their benefit checks.

Gov. Mark Sanford agreed to sign off on a request for a $146 million federal loan just as unemployment benefits were set to run out. But he demanded that the commission meet certain requirements.

Sanford said he will fire the agency's three commissioners, who each earn $100,000, if it does not provide better information to the state Commerce Department. At least two groups of lawmakers pledged to request a review of the commission by the Legislative Audit Council.

The state's 8.4 percent unemployment rate for November was the third-highest in the country,

Bonus brouhaha

With a bottomed-out economy and longshoremen looking for second jobs, state Sen. Glenn McConnell said the State Ports Authority picked the wrong time to hand out bonuses.

The SPA awarded $208,000 to its top managers and roughly $500,000 to the rest of its employees. The bonuses were based on a predetermined performance plan, the SPA said. The incentive plan is a more than 20-year-old program that is included in the SPA's annual budget. About 25 ports across the country have similar plans.

Shipping cuts

Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. said Tuesday that it will consolidate some of its North America offices and cut its labor force, blaming a global slump in the ocean-shipping business. The firm's Charleston office is among those that will lose an undisclosed number of employees, a spokeswoman said. The company is a large customer for the Port of Charleston.

Look again?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thinks Force Protection Inc. should have its 2006 financial statements audited again because of accounting oversights at the firm that examined its books for that year. The Ladson-based armored-vehicle maker said it would request a waiver from the recommendation. Force Protection said it wants to avoid falling behind again on its SEC filing deadlines. The SEC said the 2006 books should be reaudited by a firm that is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The regulatory board revoked the registration of Force Protection's 2006 outside auditor, Jaspers + Hall PC, about two months ago for violating accounting rules and standards. Jasper + Hall is no longer the manufacturer's auditor.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links