No one rates assisted living centers
No federal rating system exists for assisted living facilities, where more than 2,000 of the tri- county's most vulnerable residents live. Some states, such as North Carolina, have instituted their own rating systems.
But in South Carolina, the only way to learn about a facility's performance is to file a Freedom of Information Act request with state health officials.
Assisted living facilities, licensed as community residential care facilities, are different from nursing homes. Assisted living residents need help with a few activities, such as taking their medicine, dressing or cleaning, but do not require the higher level of medical care nursing homes offer.
The number of complaints of physical abuse in residential care facilities more than doubled to 238 from 111 between 2004 and 2006, according to the S.C. Lieutenant Governor's Office on Aging ombudsman program.
Complaints can range from serious allegations of abuse to dinner being served late. Sandra Belaja, 60, although not abused, did find the conditions of one area facility so substandard she moved out and into a hotel.
Belaja was discharged from an area hospital in the fall to Palmetto Residential Care Facility on Spruill Avenue in North Charleston to make sure she took her medicine. Previously, she paid rent and lived on her own.
Belaja, a tiny woman with a sharp sense of humor, has congestive heart failure, lupus and other related health problems.
"You name it, I got it," she said. "My heart is not even working at 10 percent."
She said the conditions at Palmetto were so bad she left to stay at the Value Place Hotel. She keeps her hotel room, high above Interstate 526, very warm and watches television from a hospital bed. Hospice workers bring her oxygen and monitor her medicine.
Residents at Palmetto often went without toilet paper and soap in the common bathroom, which had two toilets for 12 people, she said. And she said that when the heating broke, the oven was used to keep residents warm.
Clara Lesesne and her husband, Gary, own Palmetto and three other facilities. She said that soap and toilet paper were on hand at all times. Repairs were done to the heating in December, she said, but she was unaware of an oven being used for warmth.
"Everything they need is always on site," Clara Lesesne said.
In October 2006, the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control issued a letter to suspend Palmetto's license, according to the agency's Web site. In July 2007, however, DHEC lifted the suspension because the facility complied with standards.
Jerry Paul, former DHEC director of regulations, said closure is hard. "With the administrative law system, you're looking at long periods of time with a facility out of compliance that can operate. You really have to have horrendous goings on at a facility before you can close one down," he said.
Palmetto did close briefly in January and re-opened with new employees and new residents, Clara Lesesne said.
DHEC, faced with state budget cuts, has only 11 inspectors for the nearly 500 assisted living facilities statewide. "We're down. We're way down," DHEC spokesman Thom Berry said about staffing.
Teresa Arnold, legislative director for American Association of Retired Persons-South Carolina said, "We need to look at the entire regulatory process and whether we're keeping people safe."
If family members want to learn about sanctions and violations at an assisted living facility, they must file a Freedom of Information Act request with state health officials. The same is true for nursing homes.
This is not good enough, advocates say. Arnold said that if the government is the entity collecting the information, then the records should be easily accessible. "You should be able to go in and see how many violations there are and what they're for," Arnold said.
DHEC was working on such a system for the facilities the agency inspect about a year ago, when Paul retired from the department's licensing division. But an online database of reports has yet to be realized.
Problem facilities can spiral out of control with complaints quickly compiling, the retired inspector said. "Complaints, more complaints. Everything gets out of disarray," he said. Three or four inspections may be done to follow up on those complaints, he said, but those reports may not show up in a rating system that only follows certain indicators.
People can ask facilities to see their most recent reports, which DHEC provides to them, Berry said. But facilities are not required to share the information.
The only solution, Paul said, is to make everything available on the Internet. Creating such a database takes money, something all state agencies lack. Meanwhile, the facts remain filed away.
Reach Jill Coley at 937-5719 or jcoley@postandcourier.com.

Comments
sig (anonymous) says...
DEHC would not be down if they would stop the Fraud that goes on in the system. It seems like very few people actually care about the elderly.
They should be given first class care. They have worked all their lives and I treat my house pets better than they some are getting treated.
Cut off the scumbags that refuse to work and then the Fraud junkies at DSS and DHHS could support the elderly also. It just makes me sick how the elderly are treated for the most part.
February 3, 2009 at 5:54 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
capnphil (anonymous) says...
The Governor's Office had the Ombudsman Division which used to investigate these facilities all the time. It was moved to the Office of the Aging, I believe. While it was in the Governor's office we would receive a complaint and get out to investigate as soon as possible, usually within a week or two at the most, we were BUSY! We would find a facility out of compliance and let them know of our findings and copy DHEC, as they were the one's who could cite for deficiencies. The Governor's office mission was to resolve the complaint, make sure action was taken. Meaning, we wanted the facility to clean its act up before DHEC arrived to cite. Why? Because, there are not enough places to house these vulnerable adults. The families often can not care for them, nor have the means, resources, or ability to do so. They cost too much to be cared for if left in a hospital setting. They do not need skilled nursing home care, so no nursing home, which is also very expensive. We don't want to shut down these facilities because we need these step-down care facilities as a society. If more remained at home you would find more people left in the home in neglectful situations. But we did need the families to visit or monitor more often then most did. The squeaky wheel did the grease in these situations, but not the Medicaid-no family support residents, unless a "Good Samaritan" visited and took note.
Most facilities made a good faith effort to clean up their acts, then DHEC would arrive a couple of weeks after we copied their office, and find the facility in compliance and not cite them. Then the facility would go back to its old ways until the next compliant arrived at our doorstep. It was a revolving door, paper-shuffling, bureaucratic nightmare. Did the mission of either Government organization help? Honestly, yes, somewhat. Ideally, NO. Bottom line, it really depends on the family to care and monitor these facilities regularly. If not them, then it does take the community to raise the child, which many of these vulnerable adults revert to at this time in their life. We do need a volunteer corps of Ombudsmen to visit nursing homes, RCF's, residential care facilities, assisted living homes, etc. to check on these folks. That is the only humane way I can see to improve the quality of life of the elderly. I've been in most every RCF and Nursing Home in the State and most everytime, violations were found. We were stringent, but the facility cleaned up for a while and all quieted down until the next complaint invariably rolled in.
February 3, 2009 at 8 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
theronce (anonymous) says...
Like the unborn, few really care about the aged. If you don't have a good family to care for you if you need it in your old age, you are poor indeed. Anything other than a caring family is just a business.
February 3, 2009 at 8:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
dawhetsell (anonymous) says...
There are good and bad assisted living places. My mother lived by herself and drove until she turned 90 years old. She put herself in a place and it turned out to be the pits. The care was not good and the food terrable. Afer two years of complaning I moved her to another assisted place. I looked around and checked out several. I talk with the people living in them and tried their food. I found one that was very good. They are out there if you look, also you get what you pay for. She is now 96 and I just had to put her in a nursing home for full care. These are rated and I put her in a 5 star rated place after cheching several out. You get what you pay for. I think that NHC is the best all over the state.
February 3, 2009 at 9:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rollo (anonymous) says...
Have Uncle Sam do it, that's the answer to all our problems!
February 3, 2009 at 11:25 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
cclark (anonymous) says...
I also mentioned the following comment in the article on nursing homes.
These are excellent articles and shed light on issues that require attention. Consumers need to take control and help a neighbor out. This is the age of the empowered consumer... I encourage all consumers of senior services to visit a new national resource that allows users to rate and review senior services online. Visit The Senior List at www.theseniorlist.com and share your experience. It's free, and anyone can add and rate a business.
Chris
February 7, 2009 at 5:21 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.