Jacksonville wants a piece of the container-port action

By Allyson Bird
The Post and Courier
Monday, February 2, 2009



JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - Driving up to a new 158-acre private shipping terminal in this northern Florida metropolis, Rick Ferrin shares his familiar refrain: "Previous to my getting here, Jacksonville was doing cars and Puerto Rico."

photo

JACKSONVILLE PORTS AUTHORITY

JaxPort has, in recent years, emerged as a container cargo handler and now ranks No. 12 in the U.S.

That's how it was when Ferrin left his last job as engineering director at the prosperous Port of Oakland, Calif., in 1997 to become executive director of the much smaller Jacksonville Port Authority, known as JaxPort.

At the time, he recognized that his East Coast foray would put him at a 'solid second-tier port,' one that ranked No. 2 in the country after the Port of New York and New Jersey for handling automobile shipments.

But JaxPort had little else to brag about. It had no Asian carriers calling at its docks, and nearly 80 percent of its business consisted of shipments to and from Puerto Rico.

A little more than a decade later, the JaxPort is emerging as a potentially formidable East Coast maritime player that gives stalwarts such as Charleston something new to worry about. Its newly opened shipping terminal, for instance, roughly doubles the number of containers it potentially could handle to 1.6 million annually. That's slightly less than the 1.7 million that came across S.C. State Ports Authority docks during the 2008 fiscal year.

photo

JACKSONVILLE PORTS AUTHORITY

Jacksonville Mayor John Peyton (red tie) celebrates in South Korea with Hanjin officials after the company inked a deal to construct a terminal at Jacksonville's Dames Point.

Pat Barber, owner of Superior Transportation, said he always recognized Jacksonville as "a sleeping giant." The port's location, easily accessible from both Miami and Atlanta, along with its network of interstates and its strength in rail, warehousing and distribution centers, raise its maritime value.

"That's why I tell everyone not to become so focused on what Savannah has done," Barber said. "Jacksonville is the one we really need to be looking at."

Indeed, the taxpayer-funded waterfront operation at JaxPort now boasts an increasingly diverse business portfolio and a sense of buoyancy in otherwise rough seas for the shipping industry.

And Ferrin makes no secret of his port's success strategy. When taking the helm in Jacksonville, he set four goals: finding and acquiring property, designing and building terminals, maintaining existing facilities and equipment and marketing the agency. He said he plans to keep growing from here.

"You don't need any competitive disadvantage in this business," Ferrin said during a recent interview. "It's a really tight business, and we're all trying to steal each other's cargo."



Model ports

Ferrin said he saw major potential in Florida's first coast when he moved there a decade ago.

While the Port of Charleston boasts a naturally deep harbor, Jacksonville has its own logistical advantages. It's where three interstate highways converge - I-10, I-75 and I-95. And it's where trucks and trains "don't have to go north to go west," said Nancy Rubin, JaxPort's communications director.

photo

The Post and Courier

Construction continues in December at Jacksonville's Dames Point terminal, where TraPac opened a terminal last month and Hanjin plans to open a terminal by 2012.

"Sixty percent of the U.S. population can reach us in 24 hours by truck," Rubin said.

Another advantage, in Ferrin's view, is the JaxPort operating model, which is markedly different from Charleston's.

While the SPA owns and operates its terminals, JaxPort uses the so-called landlord-tenant system. Ferrin likens it to the Burger King motto: "Have it your way."

As landlord, JaxPort maintains equipment and provides security for its properties. It employs about 160 people, plus a few others through contracts. The SPA, in comparison, has 570 employees.

Ferrin said the newly opened private terminal in his city otherwise might have gone to Savannah, a mutual rival for both Jacksonville and Charleston, had it not been for his agency's business model.

Reader poll

Should the port of Charleston consider changing to a landlord-tenant system?

  • Yes 77% 81 votes
  • No 22% 24 votes

105 total votes.

He acknowledged that JaxPort, which reported about $40 million in operating revenue in its 2007 fiscal year, would likely earn more money if his agency was run like the SPA. Ferrin said he stands behind the landlord model.

"We like it that way, and our tenants like it that way," he said.

In South Carolina, where container volume has been slipping, the issue over private industry's role in running publicly owned ports is now re-emerging as a major issue both on the waterfront and in the General Assembly.

The push by lawmakers to revisit the SPA's hands-on business model intensified in October, when Maersk Line, the world's largest container carrier and the Port of Charleston's biggest customer, disclosed its intentions to move its business elsewhere over cost issues.



"Big leagues"

Jacksonville's efforts to diversify its port business by attracting more container lines isn't new, but the strategy appears to be bearing fruit.

JaxPort officials began courting Asian carriers as soon as Ferrin joined the agency. Eventually, a marketing representative set up shop in Seoul, South Korea, to do the same. Even Mayor John Peyton has made goodwill trips to drum up port business in Japan, South Korea, Scandinavia and Brazil.

photo

Rick Ferrin

The effort seems to have paid off.

Japan's TraPac, a subsidiary of Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, broke ground at Jacksonville's Dames Point in 2005. The $230 million terminal opened last month

with the capacity to handle the equivalent of 800,000 20-foot-long shipping containers each year. The facility is projected to generate an estimated $1 billion for the local economy each year and directly employ 5,600 workers.

Speaking at a grand opening announcement, Ferrin crowed that the completion of the TraPac project "signals JaxPort's move into the big leagues of international trade."

JaxPort said the extra capacity came after it posted a 4 percent increase in its container volume, as new business began calling on an existing terminal. Whether TraPac profitably can utilize all of that new space remains in question, especially as rival ports, including Charleston's, rush to expand at a time when shippers and shipping lines alike retrench.

More privately financed container capacity is on the way in Jacksonville, now the nation's 12th largest container port. South Korean steamship line Hanjin plans to invest $300 million to build a 90-acre terminal at TraPac's northern end by 2012.

"TraPac put us on the map and Hanjin takes us to the next level," Ferrin said in announcing the deal Dec. 10.

When both new terminals are operational, JaxPort will have tripled its container capacity. And cars and cargo from Puerto Rico will only be the half of it.

Reach Allyson Bird at 937-5594 or abird@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

truthseeker (anonymous) says...

It is good to see the Post & Courier showing its readers how other ports operate with different business models.

February 2, 2009 at 5:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Neponset (anonymous) says...

Interesting article, which helps explain why the port of Charleston is slipping and shipping lines want to take their business elsewhere. If our leaders want to make some changes, looks like it would be easy to change to the land lord model, but overcoming the transportation situation would be harder and very expensive.

February 2, 2009 at 6:43 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Zod (anonymous) says...

.....the transportation situation. Do you mean that we should not be saying "NO!" to federal dollars for federal highways such as I-73? Wow! Imagine that. What a concept it would be to invest in the lowcountry infrastructure.

February 2, 2009 at 8:33 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Neponset (anonymous) says...

Z
I don't understand your comment. Jax has three interstates and we have one and our rail service, I suspect, is limited - get the money any way you can. Its unfortunate that I-95 is an hour west.

February 2, 2009 at 9:56 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

icbmman (anonymous) says...

Great point Zod. Keep in mind that the reason I-95 is an hour west of Charleston is ALSO because of the idiot NIMBYs of this city. My parents once told me that I-95 was supposed to be built just after Ashley Phosphate Road, but it was re-routed to its present location due to pressure from Columbia, who also wanted the interstate. From what I understand, additional pressure from these hysterical preservationists and NIMBYs allowed this re-routing to occur.

Think about it. If Chas had invested in wise infrastructure, with I-95 being located much closer or even intersecting the Neck, business and industry in the metro area would've grown much faster than now, and the port would probably still have high rates of business.

The Global Gateway terminal, I-95, I-73, obsessive preservation for every inch of marsh and every tree...leading now to the port of Chas' decline from prominence; these are the achievements of the NIMBYs. And people complain about Chas not having enough high-paying jobs...

February 2, 2009 at 10:31 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Zod (anonymous) says...

icbman, The P&C has old conceptual renderings with 95 running parallel to the old Cooper River Bridges. I have seen the rendering along with an accompanying article. You are correct. I-95 was also shunned away by people that already had money.

The sad fact is that a silent majority does exist. You know them. They are your neighbors. They race home from work with kids in tow. The kids dress for ball practice or some other activity and one parent and the kids are back out the door. The other parent stays home to cook dinner. An hour and a half later dinner is served. An hour of whatever family time is all that is left to the day. Did you see any time for "public hearings" in that schedule?

February 2, 2009 at 7:53 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

oldandintheway (anonymous) says...

I quickly read this article but I don't think I saw any mention of florida union demands, ILA, etc.
funny how that seems to dominate the chas. situation.
the chas. ILA should clean house, oust the current leader, get a grip, come to terms, and move in the direction of securing longterm jobs, good wages, and benefits for the hard working dues paying members.
this can be done.

February 2, 2009 at 8:27 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

TRODI (anonymous) says...

The Global Gateway terminal, I-95, I-73, obsessive preservation for every inch of marsh and every tree...leading now to the port of Chas' decline from prominence; these are the achievements of the NIMBYs. And people complain about Chas not having enough high-paying jobs...

They only want to preserve marsh and trees if it doesnt effect them building 3000 condos on it or some other real estate venture.i personally think a piece of the Daniel island property should be for section 8 low income housing.it could get some of the youth from the eastside a chance to better themselves and bring a wider cultural diversity to the island.
As for the ila there is some dissension between both locals.one local stands to lose a lot of jobs while the other just a few.one side wants to make concessions while the other doesn't.it appears there going to work something out soon.the spa wasnt always doing this to its customers.
butler from Georgetown demanded 35%profits if the lower management at the spa budgeted lower than that they sent it back to be redone and people got their but chewed out.that in a nutshell is what has been going wrong with the port for
the last 5 or so years .while before that the spa and ila never saw eye to eye they did have somewhat of a working relationship and business was good.

February 2, 2009 at 10:09 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

icbmman (anonymous) says...

Good point, Trodi. Well said, Zod, and that information about I-95 is even more enlightening. My parents gave me inaccurate information about the location, but I do remember others mentioning the Neck near the old Cooper River bridges. Wow. Imagine what that could've been if I-95 was built parallel to the Ravenel bridge. Imagine the business and industry. Imagine a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT Eastside. Like I've said, you reap what you sow, NIMBYs.

There is indeed a silent majority in Chas. Its the same majority who want I-526 completed, roads widened, streets and sidewalks well lit at night, more opportunities for business, and better schools. That's why public hearings should be held on the weekend.

February 2, 2009 at 10:33 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

vicupstate (anonymous) says...

Anyone can draw a line on a map. That does not mean that any given one was the best or the most viable route. There were SEVERAL routes layed out for I-73, in the Pee Dee, but only could be choosen. No doubt the same thing happens whenever any major highway is planned.

I grew up in Florence, and the legend there is that the very senior Congressman, John McMillan, caused I-95 to be moved so that it would run through Florence. Most likely Columbia and the Florence joined forces to prevail over the Charleston route. Also remember that Barnwell had numerous powerful legislators in Columbia during this period (Edgar Brown, Sol Blatt).

Running I-95 through Charleston, rather than the very rural stretch that it does, would have been much more expensive. It would have run right through the Francis Marion National Forest. Both of those would have been powerful arguments in favor of the Columbia/Florence side.

So basically, a large number of things come into play in choosing a path for an interstate, politics from MANY sides being the biggest.

When the route for I-95 was being planned the environmental movement by and large was non-existant, BTW.

February 4, 2009 at 9:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.