Appeal under way to allow revetment

By Yvonne Wenger
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, August 25, 2009



COLUMBIA -- Conservationists fought in court Monday to stop what they see as the first step in the development of 50 homes on an unstable portion of Kiawah Island.

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ralph Anderson III heard opening arguments by attorneys for the Kiawah Development Partners, the state Department of Health and Environmental Control and the Coastal Conservation League.

The Kiawah developers appealed DHEC's December decision to allow only 10 percent, or 270 feet, of the construction of an erosion barrier. The developers want to build a 2,783-foot bulkhead and revetment to stop erosion next to Beachwalker Park.

Previous story

Sam's Spit wall sought, published 06/13/09

The judge can decide whether to uphold DHEC's decision, allow the developers to construct the full length of the barrier or require the agency to take another look at the situation. The hearing is expected to continue the rest of the week. Anderson likely won't rule from the bench, so a decision will come sometime later.

The developer's attorney Trenholm Walker said DHEC should have based its decision on the barrier itself, not any "alleged" effects of residential development. Any new home construction would have to go through a separate vetting process, Walker said. He also said that the town's zoning laws allow for residential development on the undeveloped spit of dunes at Kiawah's southwestern end, an area near Capt. Sam's Inlet that has grown faster than the rest of the island.

"What's before the court is the effects of the revetment," Walker said.

The agency must, however, make its decisions in the true-life context, said Davis Whitfield-Cargile, an attorney for DHEC's Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management.

Additionally, the Conservation League argued that the barrier and subsequent development would put marine life, specifically diamond terrapins turtles and piping plover birds, in jeopardy. A 40- to 80-year cycle would put future homes under a breach that the barrier couldn't protect, said league attorneys Amy Armstrong and James Chandler Jr.

In addition to calling witness Leonard Long, executive vice president for Kiawah Development, Walker is expected to call on experts to testify on the lack of impact on marine wildlife.

Long said the state coast is dotted with "hundreds and hundreds" of revetments. The one his company is proposing would include holes where vegetation could grow to give it a natural appearance that could harbor wildlife. He relied on the reputation of Kiawah's longtime investors for their environmental protections, such as strict beachfront development setback requirements.

The conservationists are expected to call on witnesses to discuss the marine wildlife issues and the spit's instability.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

sardis12 (anonymous) says...

Ah, Henry Brown's buddies are at it again...

August 25, 2009 at 1:07 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Southern_Cousin (anonymous) says...

This is the stupidest idea ever- one hurricane or less hits the new development and Boom - all those homes become the responsiblity of the taxpayer to rebuild.
FEMA is funded by your taxes. What is this, a future welfare check for the rich? Because it will happen.

JUST SAY NO !

Not to mention this will just destroy the beauty of the area. Not that the greedy developers and Henry Brown care anything about that.

Aren't there enough unsold homes of Kiawah? This whole thing is a very very bad idea for everyone - except the developers. That is why they are fighting so very hard.

August 25, 2009 at 7:59 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

mkris (anonymous) says...

kIAWAH pARTNERS GETS EVERYTHING THEY WANT.
South Carolina has the best politicians money can buy.

August 25, 2009 at 2:07 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links