DHEC wrapping up Kinder Morgan permit

The Post and Courier
Tuesday, September 30, 2008


After more than two years of fine-tuning, state health officials are putting final touches on a permit that would grant Kinder Morgan Energy Partners permission to expand its North Charleston coal terminal.

The state Department of Health and Environmental Control will go over a draft of the operating permit tonight at a public meeting. The 55-page permit would allow the facility to release a certain amount of dust and other particles into the air during its daily operations.

Liz Basil, a permit director for the agency's Bureau of Air Quality, said that the permit's restrictions have been strengthened throughout the process.

For example, the original permit said that crane operators had to stop scooping coal from ships onto conveyer belts when the sustained wind speed hit 35 miles per hour. The latest permit lowers that threshold to 25 miles per hour.

To prevent the fine coal dust from escaping the site, the company enclosed a portion of its conveyer belt system. It also installed additional water spraying systems throughout the facility.

Under the permit, workers will have to submit semi-annual emission reports, and the facility will be subject to surprise state-led inspections. The site passed two such visits in July, state documents show.

Kinder Morgan, a Texas-based energy company, originally asked in early 2006 for permission to expand its annual coal off-loading capacity to 10 million tons. That's four times its current capacity.

Company executives have said they want to bring in more imported coal from South America.

But nearby residents and boaters who dock at the Cooper River Marina objected to the proposed expansion, citing health concerns, railroad traffic worries and the fact that the coal often covered the boats with a layer of dust after a windstorm.

The objections prompted the formation of a citizen's advisory panel, which meets monthly. The company came up with ways to speed up train traffic crossings, while air quality tests showed that the amount of coal dust emitted by the facility falls within federal health guidelines.

Despite the findings, several panel members have said they're still concerned about the expansion.

Reach Katy Stech at 937-5549 or kstech@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

sig (anonymous) says...

I agree. It does not matter which party is in office. Get rid of the bums. They are not thinking about the public and the taxpayers.

September 30, 2008 at 7:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

zoomru (anonymous) says...

Citizen ....ALERT !!!

Why do we need MORE COAL when OUR power PLANTS should be NUCLEAR ???!!!

Are we railing more COAL to other STATES ??!!

Citizens...stand up for the PEE DEE region !!!

Where is the Coastal Conservation Leadership ??? These people are beginning to look a lot like RAINBOW PUSH !!!!

People... Educate yourself on this GOOD OL' BOY Shakedown!!!

Has any Leader stood UP ???
Lindsey?
CLYBURN?
Legislators??
Riley?
Demint??
Spratt??
SANFORD ???

TAXPAYERS ....LookOUT !!!!

September 30, 2008 at 9:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

panasonic (anonymous) says...

If a permit applicant meets the requirements for a permit, then why should they not be granted a permit. Sounds like Kinder Morgan did everything that was asked of them by DHEC. Now is not the time for the state to be denying permits just because they are not from an industry that is percieved as sexy, particularly in the economic times which we are currently in. We need to encourage economic growth, not inhibit it.

September 30, 2008 at 10:11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

zoomru (anonymous) says...

Panasonic,.........

I am all for economic GROWTH....bar NONE ! However, all the facts need to be divulged! How does this permit impact CSX and Norfolk Southern? Land Swaps??? The Jasper Ports DEAL?? Magnolia Project ?? Is this expansion to meet the NEEDS of the COAL Fired Plant in the PEE DEE ?? Why ..when we all know it NEEDS to be NUCLEAR !!!
If this expansion is to meet the COAL demands in Tenn, Georgia, N.C. and beyond ...OK !!?

This reporting needs to be BETTER !!!

October 1, 2008 at 8:05 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

algorelost (anonymous) says...

ZOOMRU
How would this have anything to do with a port in Jasper County?!

October 1, 2008 at 9:11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

scgaffer2u (anonymous) says...

P & C, You had a great story here and you blew it. Not to worry. This state's governmental structure is so convoluted and mismanaged there will be many other opportunities in the future.

Lessons learned:
DHEC is a fraud. For months they feigned deep concern knowing all-along that they were going to grant the permit anyway. Finally, at the public meeting, they admitted that they lacked the standards to do anything. Incredibly, they installed a monitor (pacifier) at the marina anyway. It was all a great show. Want to save the taxpayers some money Governor?

The folks at Kinder Morgan (KM) seemed ok. They listened and made some expensive changes that seem to be working. From this boater's perspective, the coal dust is considerably less than it was. But, let's see what happens now that the Permit has been granted. In appreciation, I pointed out several observations to KM that would seem to indicate that they are not going to make a great deal of money on this coal handling operation.

Finally, the concept of 10.5 million tons of coal to passing through Charleston is absurd. It would take more than five coal trains (each about 1 mile long) per day, 365 days per year to move that amount of coal. Do the math. Each coal car carries 100 tons (approx.). Each train is 100 cars (approx.). Therefore, each train carries 10,000 tons. Divide 10 million tons by 10,000 tons and you get 1,000 trains per year or 2.7 trains per day. Since trains have to arrive and depart that makes 5 trains every day 365 days per year. Calling this proposal absurd is being kind. Just wait until the SCSPA tries to get a train in or out of the Naval Base terminal.

These concerns have been expressed in letters and/or emails to: The Post and Courier, KM and our state and local legislators including North Charleston officials. It was an interesting exercise very much like talking to a wall.

November 8, 2008 at 10:31 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.