Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Analysis reveals scores don't jibe

Second school's test scores also in question

The Post and Courier
Sunday, September 28, 2008


Discrepancies in Sanders-Clyde Elementary's recent test scores raise new questions about the school's record of achievement.

Wade Spees
The Post and Courier

Discrepancies in Sanders-Clyde Elementary's recent test scores raise new questions about the school's record of achievement.

Previous story

High-stakes testing puts pressure on educators, published 09/14/08 (has links to earlier stories)

In 2007, Sanders-Clyde Elementary students' scores on the state Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test were among the best in Charleston County.

That same year, Sanders-Clyde students also took a lesser-known test and had some of the weakest scores in the county.

The Post and Courier uncovered the gap after requesting test scores from the school district.

There is less than a one percent likelihood that chance alone explains the wide gap, according to a statistical analysis requested by the newspaper.

The discrepancy in Sanders-Clyde's test scores raises new questions about the school's record of achievement. Further analysis revealed testing irregularities at another school, E.B. Ellington Elementary in Ravenel.

Like Sanders-Clyde, that school had a gap between its students' performance on the PACT and the other test, Measures of Academic Progress, or MAP.

In Ellington Elementary's case, the State Law Enforcement Division charged a fifth-grade teacher, Felicia Perrineau, with breaking state testing laws, and the state Department of Education invalidated the school's fifth-grade test scores from 2007.

Now, state law enforcement officials are looking at downtown Sanders-Clyde after a striking drop in test scores this spring.

PACT vs. MAP

Until a couple of weeks ago, Sanders-Clyde was one of the district's success stories. Former Principal MiShawna Moore transformed one of the lowest-scoring schools in the district to a place where students scored higher than district and state averages.

But a high number of student eraser marks on the 2007 PACT tests and improbable one-year academic gains triggered district officials to keep a close watch for the first time on the school's testing in May.

PACT test results released a few weeks ago revealed drops in every subject and in every grade.

The PACT test is one of two major exams that Charleston County elementary and middle school students take, and those scores are used to gauge schools' progress or failure. Schools with strong PACT scores can receive money and awards. Schools with low PACT scores can be taken over by the state.

There's only one version of the PACT test for every grade, and the test involves No. 2 pencils and paper. The tests that span several days are locked up daily.

Although strict rules govern PACT testing procedures, state officials concede that honesty is what stops school leaders from manipulating results.

The second big test students take is MAP. These test results mostly are used to guide teachers' instruction throughout the year.

MAP tests are given on the computer, and students' scores are generated electronically. The questions change for each student, depending on whether he or she answers correctly. That means a class of 30 students could be working on 30 different test questions.

"You can't cheat with MAP," said Janet Rose, the executive director of assessment and accountability for Charleston County schools. The only exception would be if a teacher stood over a student and coached him or her on individual answers, she said.

While the PACT and MAP tests are different, students' scores should roughly match. That hasn't happened at Sanders-Clyde.

Sanders-Clyde gap

The Post and Courier requested Sanders-Clyde's PACT and MAP scores for the past four years. After noting the magnitude of the test-score gaps, the newspaper asked the school district to statistically analyze the gaps among county schools for 2007 results.

Sanders-Clyde students have scored far higher on the PACT exam than the MAP test for the past four years. The gap between proficient and advanced students' performance on PACT and MAP in 2007 was the biggest in the county.

Sanders-Clyde was the only county school where the likelihood is less than 1 percent that the scoring gap occurred by chance alone in English and math, according to a statistical analysis of the 2007 scores.

Rose characterized the scoring discrepancies as "unusual" and "much greater" in comparison to other schools.

The gap between the scores widened every year, with paper-and-pencil PACT scores far outpacing the growth that showed up on the computerized MAP test.

For instance, the percentage of Sanders-Clyde students scoring proficient and advanced was on average 10 points higher on PACT compared to MAP. That was three years ago.

Two years ago, the percentage of students scoring proficient and advanced was an average 33 points higher on PACT than MAP. In 2007 that number increased to 54 points, a bigger gap than any other county school.

The score gap lessened significantly this past year after the district stationed monitors in Sanders-Clyde. For the first time, MAP scores were higher than PACT scores for proficient and advanced students, by an average of 6 percentage points. That put the gap in the school's scores more in line with other county schools.

Two other Charleston County schools, Dunston Elementary in North Charleston and E.B. Ellington Elementary, also had much higher PACT scores compared to MAP, according to the statistical analysis.

The probability that the gap in proficient and advanced students' scores in English at E.B. Ellington happened because of chance alone is less than 1 percent, the analysis showed. The gap for the same students' scores in math wasn't statistically significant.

Gaps elsewhere

It's illegal for a teacher to share PACT test questions with students before the exam. At Ellington Elementary in 2007, a teacher obtained a copy of the previous year's PACT test from someone in another school district, and the teacher gave that test to her students to study and prepare for PACT, Superintendent Nancy McGinley said.

PACT tests aren't exactly the same from year to year, but the state reuses some questions. The teacher said she didn't know it was a copy of the previous year's exam and thought it was a practice test, McGinley said.

District officials turned the information over to the state, but weren't informed that Perrineau, the Ellington teacher, had been charged.

Perrineau entered a pre-trial intervention program, and her charges were dismissed.

The state Board of Education could revoke or suspend Perrineau's teaching certificate.

That has not happened, and state Education Department Spokesman Jim Foster could not say whether Perrineau was under further investigation. The school district did not rehire Perrineau, who along with Moore could not be reached for comment.

At Dunston Elementary, the gap wasn't significant among its highest scoring students, but it was among those who scored on a basic level or above. The probability that the gap in math and English happened because of chance alone is less than 5 percent, the analysis showed.

Rose said she expected a larger score difference at Dunston because only the third graders at the K-3 school take both tests.

That's a much smaller number of kids compared to other schools where multiple grades are tested, and there's a greater likelihood for bigger score differences with a small number of students, she said.

In the case of Sanders-Clyde, officials weren't suspicious of the school's gains until they received PACT results in the fall of 2007, and at that point they checked with the state and decided to closely watch the school's testing the following spring, McGinley said.

McGinley has looked at MAP scores to highlight schools' mid-year progress, but those scores weren't studied especially closely, she said. The results mostly were used as an instructional tool to help teachers better target students' instructional needs, she said.

It's 20/20 hindsight to go back and say Sanders-Clyde should have been flagged as a major issue, she said, given the discrepancy in its PACT and MAP scores, but officials weren't looking at MAP results to see whether they aligned with PACT.

Given what's happened, the school district should watch this more carefully in the future and share any significant score differences with the state, McGinley said.

"This is something we have to figure out how to pay attention to going forward," she said.

Reach Diette Courrégé at 937-5546 or dcourrege@postandcourier.com.







Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  19 comment(s)

Posted by katsplay on September 28, 2008 at 4:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I know that sometimes the online version has typos and errors that the print version doesn't--and vice-versa. But please tell me WHY they used the word "jibe" in the headline when it should be "jive"?

Did this same word make it into the print version, too?



Posted by LutherVanderhorst on September 28, 2008 at 4:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I love the photo of the sign in front of the school,
"Where every child is more than a test score."



Posted by Teach7775 on September 28, 2008 at 5:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

They need to make an example of these people who cheated... With all that is going on in the world today this is the last thing our society should be worrying sbout...



Posted by Riptide on September 28, 2008 at 6:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

LutherV...

Your right it does appear to be a contradiction as to how they view children. The purpose of school is to teach and learn and the medium to measure success or failure is the test. I think these schools need to go back to the fundamentals.



Posted by belovedbliff on September 28, 2008 at 7:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This article can easily leave one with the impression that CCSD is so noble in its investigation when they (and everyone else)knew that this was going on. It (the cheating, the discrepancy) was talked about openly for years.



Posted by moonpie on September 28, 2008 at 7:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How about teach the kids and lets revamp this testing system. Seems like that is all we hear, test dates...
This is what it has come to that someone would cheat to better test scores.



Posted by oldglory on September 28, 2008 at 8:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

katsplay -

jib·ing. to be in harmony or accord; agree: The report does not quite jibe with the commissioner's observations.

----------------------------------------------------------------
[Origin: 1805–15, Americanism; orig. uncert.]

—Synonyms conform, accord, fit.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.



Posted by katsplay on September 28, 2008 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

oldglory--

Thanks. Just my opinion that jive (meaning misleading or phony) would have been the word to put in there.

I appreciate your input!



Posted by 10216340 on September 28, 2008 at 9:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

So, why not use the MAP test as the state test? It gives teachers more specific data on student deficiencies and achievements AND the results are immediately available.

The article pointed out the only way to cheat is to stand over a student and guide them in answering. Seems that is less likely to happen than some teacher or administrator messing with PACT answer sheets after hours.

Plus, since it's already used, it would save a lot of time and money (basically every minute and penny that is now spent on PACT would not be needed)



Posted by sethook on September 28, 2008 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

As more and more school systems start handing out money for performance, should we expect the players to act anyway different than what we see in sports and business? We'll soon start seeing the faculties and students jazzed up on steroids and subprime testing methods.



Posted by jeff61 on September 28, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Former Principal MiShawna Moore,,, where is she at in all this....high number of student eraser marks on the 2007 PACT tests and improbable one-year academic gains triggered district officials to keep a close watch for the first time on the school's testing in May.

PACT test results released a few weeks ago revealed drops in every subject and in every grade.

You got some explaining to do....



Posted by belovedbliff on September 28, 2008 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

MAP and PACT measure two different kinds of achievements. MAP is basically about what kids already happen to know. PACT is based on a set of standards that are supposed to be taught.

Also, MAP is not in all subject areas.



Posted by 20lbtest on September 28, 2008 at 11:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Stong work Post and Courier!

For our children's sake---hold the cheaters accountable!



Posted by Charlenehughes on September 28, 2008 at 4:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This happened on Nancy Mcginley's watch. She needs to go!!!!!



Posted by wise1 on September 28, 2008 at 5:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Charlene...my sentiments exactly. I work for the district and things have changed drastically since Dr. McGinley took over as superintendent. some teachers were paid the first couple of weeks before and after school started.



Posted by Teach7775 on September 28, 2008 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This is just a sad sad sad thing....



Posted by ParkCircle4Ever on September 29, 2008 at 4:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Contrary to popular belief, schools who do well on testing and have high improvement ratings actually receive less money, in that the better they do, the less title I money they receive. So to me, that says that if Moore did indeed help her school 'cheat' she was mainly doing it to make herself look good, not get more money for the school.



Posted by shoelaces on September 30, 2008 at 1:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

GREAT POINT!! If our school meets AYP and goes from below average to average we will lose tens of thousands of dollars in funding.

That does not mean that I want to stay below average as a school. But one does have to wonder about the funding.

As for MAP and PACT. PACT (now PASS) was a much more secure test than MAP testing could ever be. Unfortunately, there are folks out there who are willing to risk their teaching credentials and the reputation of a child or school to raise a few points.

Ms. Moore needs to have her feet held to the fire. I am not sure what specifically McGinley has to do with this testing issue????? I could be wrong but I don't think she hired Ms. Moore.



Posted by clisby on September 30, 2008 at 2:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

shoelaces: I'm curious: In what way do you think PACT is a more secure test than MAP? Is there some problem with the NWEA?
All ears ....




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)