Report details port pollution

BY ALLYSON BIRD
Tuesday, September 23, 2008



For the first time, Charleston knows roughly how much poisonous gas, acid rain and smog its port creates.

The S.C. State Ports Authority on Monday released an air emissions inventory.

It is the first report of its kind in the Southeast, according to SPA officials.

The Port of Charleston accounts for up to 5 percent of air pollution within the three-county area, with ships and trucks generating the majority of that contamination.

The study, completed by the Long Beach, Calif.-based civil engineering firm Moffat & Nichol, covers a 2,500-square-mile area, from 12 nautical miles past the jetties to the outlying boundaries of Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester counties.

Port officials said the findings will help the SPA understand the sources and scope of pollution as it aims to improve air quality.

The SPA undertook the study as part of an agreement signed last year with the state Department of Health and Environmental Control to reduce emissions. The inventory's completion coincides with the award of more than $735,000 in matching federal funds for a $1.7 million pollution-reduction project.

photo

The Post and Courier

A container ship heads out of Charleston Harbor at sunrise.

Port pollutants

These are the five types of pollutants quantified in the 2005 Port of Charleston Baseline Air Emissions Inventory:

--Nitrogen oxides. A precursor to ozone, which is the main component of smog.

--Sulfur dioxide. Can affect breathing, especially among children and the elderly. Also contributes to acid rain and poor visibility.

--Carbon monoxide. Colorless, odorless, poisonous gas.

--Hydrocarbons. Form ozone.

--Particulate matter. Includes dirt, dust, soot, smoke and liquid droplets released into the air.

The inventory looks at the port's output of five pollutants in 2005. Both ships and trucks produced roughly 1,500 tons of nitrogen oxides, a precursor to ozone, which is the main component of smog. Nitrogen oxides account for 58 percent of the total emissions catalogued in the study.

Also, ships produced nearly 1,100 tons of sulfur dioxide, the second most common emission. Sulfur dioxide can cause breathing problems, especially in children and elderly people, and it contributes to acid rain and poor visibility

In 2005, more than 400 ships, mostly container carriers, made about 2,000 port calls in Charleston. The emissions inventory also took into account nearly 2 million truck trips.

The port's busiest terminal, Wando Welch in Mount Pleasant, produced the most of each type of pollutant and accounted for 70 percent of heavy-duty vehicle emissions alone.

Nancy Vinson, a program director with the Coastal Conservation League, which has been critical of the port's impact on air quality and public health, said she was glad to see the SPA looking broadly at the effects of its emissions. But at the same time, she said the 5 percent estimate is understated.

"They're probably the top air polluter in the city of Charleston," Vinson said. "In the whole tri-county area you've got big cement plants and coal-fired power plants that are much farther from people and have much taller stacks, so it's not at ground level. That's not a valid comparison."

The SPA has been working on emission-reduction projects since 2005, including replacing diesel-fueled cranes with electric cranes; switching to ultra-low sulfur diesel; and reducing truck idling.

The agency learned Friday it would receive matching grant funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency toward its $1.7 million project to further those efforts.

The money includes $1.1 million to replace engines on the SPA's 21 rubber-tired gantry cranes to potentially reduce nitrogen oxides by 57 percent and particulate matter by 39 percent. Another $450,000 will go toward technology to reduce truck idling time, and $125,000 more will be used to retrofit trucks to save fuel.

The SPA and its grant partners will pay $963,500 toward the improvements.

But Vinson said none of that money will immediately tackle pollution from ships, which account for 43 percent of the port-related emissions.

Pat Barber, owner of Superior Transportation and president of the Charleston Motor Carriers Association, said a committee that includes his group and the SPA plans to distribute money to trucking companies for power units, single-radial tires and other equipment that will cut down on diesel consumption.

In addition to the SPA's efforts, DHEC is in the early stages of a "saturation study" of air emissions, according to department spokesman Adam Myrick. That means the state will set up air-quality monitors at sites around the Port of Charleston in the coming months.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

jnot (anonymous) says...

Tri-county area? Are you kidding me? You may as well let them get away with saying that the port produces less than 1% of the pollution in the state as long as you're letting them define the boundries. I want to know how much it contributes to the pollution of the county that it is entirely situated within, and not part of some hodgepodge of land that stretches 50+ miles inland in every direction. I'd bet money that the port is a bigger polluter than Westvaco or any other single non-public industry in Charleston County.

September 23, 2008 at 1:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

wjhamilton3 (anonymous) says...

The court settlement for the Wando terminal allegedly required the State Ports authority to monitor emmissions there, but monitoring ended many years ago.

I've seen studies that particulant pollution of the type generated by ships burning low quality bunker oil causes asthma.

We don't really know what has been happening the last several years.

Why don't the plans for their new terminal at the Navy Base in N. Charleston include efficient railroad connections and marshalling yards, which could even be operated using electric locomotives? Why are we building a port terminal to favor the trucking industry and marginalizing rail?

Why whould a shipping company choose to bring cargo to Charleston to load on trucks when they can land it in Los Angeles where it goes directly on a train and then gets pulled across the country in four days? Are we sure such a port can compete. It Walmart that stupid?

I really doubt imports from China (and soon India) can reach the inland United States cheaper through Charleston than the West coast if they're making rail more available than we are.

September 23, 2008 at 10:12 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JustinDiGiulio (anonymous) says...

Efforts seem to be focused only on vehicle emissions in high traffic areas. Ships and trucks only. I am concerned with what is coming out of those smoke stacks. I am new to the area and a little worried. I can smell Mt. Pleasant some days. Its this rich rotten egg smell. Something I thought was a paper factory, but that is not mentioned at all in this article and seems to be of no concern in this project. I hate driving 526 because going over those large bridges near the factories smells so terrible it's almost incapacitating. Glad to hear there is funding for anti-pollution measures, but I would like to know more about the bigger picture.

September 23, 2008 at 10:13 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

edwardh1 (anonymous) says...

Where do SPA profits go? And why cant they spend some of their business income on improving the health of people in Charleston?
They say "we are here to help the people of SC" well, people in Charleston are from SC too. And what are they doing to retrain rude in a hurry tractor trailer drivers who tailgate in heavy traffic when you can not speed up???

September 23, 2008 at 2:50 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links