Parking in a park?
Annual event leaves city divided on hot-button issue
People who think too much public space is devoted to parking set out to make their point Friday in an annual event known as Park(ing) Day, which in Charleston involved laying down sod and setting up lawn chairs and a pingpong table in a downtown parking lot.
The thinking, with which Charleston city planners generally agree, is that too much land is set aside for cars.
Vince Graham, developer of the I'On community, organized a similar event two years ago. The city ticketed him after he set up a table and chairs in a metered parking space, the ticket was later dropped.
The Post and Courier
Anna Montgomery (from left), Patrick Johnson. Ann McDonald and Gary Collins, all of DesignWorks, play pingpong Friday in the parking lot at the corner of Church and Market streets as part of the 2008 National Park(ing) Day. The DesignWorks team decorated an old Volvo (foreground) with plants, flowers, shrubs and grass for the event.
The Post and Courier
Eighteen-month-old Michael Cipolla and his mom, Anne Cipolla, visit the Park(ing) Day event Friday.
This year, the city was among the co-sponsors of the event, led by The Trust for Public Land, and the parking spaces used were within the confines of a parking lot along the Market downtown.
"We've sort of embraced this concept that the automobile is king, and it's unfortunate," Graham said Friday. "It's an example of how we let the car trump humans."
But here's the rub: many humans also want a place to park their cars.
When the city proposed new rules this summer that would reduce the amount of parking required for some new construction projects, downtown neighborhood groups quickly squashed that proposal.
Residents were concerned that they would face more competition for on-street parking spots if new homes and businesses did not have to provide as much parking as before.
"We met, on two occasions, with the downtown neighborhood consortium to discuss those concerns, and certain members of that group were adamant in their opposition," said city zoning administrator Lee Batchelder. "We just couldn't get any support."
The city withdrew the plan and is amending it to address the neighborhood concerns.
"The ones who were really concerned were Ansonborough, Harleston Village and the French Quarter," said Charles Rhoden, president of the neighborhood consortium. "I quite understand their concerns about it."
Historic Ansonborough Neighborhood Association President Lance Hiatt said his neighbors were particularly worried about parking, considering the new arena under construction nearby.
"I think a lot of the things they were pushing for were more for suburban areas and did not really work in the city," he said.
Batchelder said the city's plan likely will exclude the downtown area and indeed focus on the suburbs. There, the city is pursuing zoning changes aimed at reducing the number of huge surface parking lots, and the city already has approved rules that require more landscaping in parking lots.



Comments
PalmettoDP (anonymous) says...
As a downtown resident, I can attest to the fact that we need more parking, not less. Architects and landscape architects have come up with good ways to blend parking facilities into the surrounding urban environment.
Mr. Graham's comment about "cars trumping humans" sounds strange to me - last time I checked, every car has at least one human inside of it.
September 21, 2008 at 9:41 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.