Hearings held on multi-boat docks
EDISTO ISLAND — More than 100 people crowded public hearings on plans to build multi-boat docks for a 10-lot development on Sand Creek and a five-lot development on Bailey Creek. Only one spoke for a developer.
The proposals have angered residents and the conservation organizations that have made a mission of keeping the island's scenic, rural character intact. The creeks are tidal backwaters. Owners of older, "family" docks along the creeks and conservationists are fighting what they call "mini-marinas" for room and view.
Developers say the multi-boat docks are less intrusive than a row of docks for each new home. Opponents say they are built to provide more docks for more homes than environmental rules would otherwise allow.
The hearings Thursday ran back-to-back for about two hours, said Adam Myrick, media relations specialist for the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control.
S.C. Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, a DHEC division, held the hearing before deciding whether to grant a permit for either project.
A representative of the Bailey Creek project told residents he would answer any questions after the meeting. No one spoke for the Sand Creek project.
Jim Brailsford of the Edisto Island Open Land Trust and the Edisto Island Community Association said he expects the decision will be appealed "whether they grant either permit, deny it or grant it with conditions."
A decision is expected after the Oct. 3 close of the comment period. Any appeal would go to the DHEC board, and then could go to a state administrative law judge.
Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.
E-mail this story 
Printer-friendly version
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Comments
This article has 0 comment(s)
