Hearings held on multi-boat docks
By Bo Petersen
EDISTO ISLAND — More than 100 people crowded public hearings on plans to build multi-boat docks for a 10-lot development on Sand Creek and a five-lot development on Bailey Creek. Only one spoke for a developer.
The proposals have angered residents and the conservation organizations that have made a mission of keeping the island's scenic, rural character intact. The creeks are tidal backwaters. Owners of older, "family" docks along the creeks and conservationists are fighting what they call "mini-marinas" for room and view.
Developers say the multi-boat docks are less intrusive than a row of docks for each new home. Opponents say they are built to provide more docks for more homes than environmental rules would otherwise allow.
The hearings Thursday ran back-to-back for about two hours, said Adam Myrick, media relations specialist for the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control.
S.C. Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, a DHEC division, held the hearing before deciding whether to grant a permit for either project.
A representative of the Bailey Creek project told residents he would answer any questions after the meeting. No one spoke for the Sand Creek project.
Jim Brailsford of the Edisto Island Open Land Trust and the Edisto Island Community Association said he expects the decision will be appealed "whether they grant either permit, deny it or grant it with conditions."
A decision is expected after the Oct. 3 close of the comment period. Any appeal would go to the DHEC board, and then could go to a state administrative law judge.
Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Notice about comments:Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Off campus
- Out with old ...
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
