Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Watchdog Update: The real story on mercury?

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, September 17, 2008


Earlier this year, amid a push to build a new coal-fired power plant in the Pee Dee, Santee Cooper launched a campaign called "The Real Story on Mercury," with company officials and consultants suggesting that concerns about mercury contamination are overblown.

For instance, in an article in the utility's magazine, PowerSource, Jay Hudson, Santee Cooper's environmental manager said, "There has never been a case of environmental mercury poisoning in the United States." The agency's Web site, therealstoryonmercury.com, makes similar claims.

Watchdog

The Post and Courier’s on-line center for investigative reporting.

Are you ticked off by people who illegally use handicap placards? Want to know which restaurants are making you sick or which gas stations have bad pumps?

Check out what our Watchdog reporters found.

Watchdog asked the Environmental Protection Agency about the statement.

"I don't know how Santee Cooper defines 'poisoning,' " said Dale Kemery, a press officer in EPA's Washington, D.C., headquarters who asked the agency's top mercury experts for a response. But he cited recent studies in Wisconsin, the Great Lakes and elsewhere across the country that show people suffering significant health effects from eating mercury-tainted food, even food containing tiny amounts of mercury.

"These (health effects) would meet the criteria for poisoning, I think," Kemery said, adding that another study found an association between mercury exposure and heart attacks.

Dr. Paul Dantzig, a New York dermatologist who teaches at Columbia University's School of Medicine, treats several patients a week for mercury-related health problems and has done studies showing a connection between mercury exposure and Parkinson's disease.

He described Santee Cooper's statements on mercury as "highly inaccurate. We see a lot of mercury toxicity and all cases are environmentally related because most mercury comes from seafood."

In the PowerSource article, Santee Cooper's mercury consultant, Gail Charnley, said the EPA "has concluded that the country's fish-eating population, including the recreational anglers, is not at risk from U.S. freshwater fish."

Kemery of the EPA said that "unfortunately some fresh water fish have been shown to contain levels of mercury" that exceed the EPA's recommended limit, and that women should check with state health officials about what kinds of fish are safe to eat.

Are people in South Carolina at risk? According to the state Department of Health and Environmental Control, some species in certain rivers are so contaminated that people shouldn't eat a single bite, particularly pregnant women. The state has mercury warnings on 1,700 miles of rivers and along the coast.

In addition, a Watchdog analysis of nearly 4,800 tests on fish caught by DHEC found that 12 percent contained more than 1 part per million of mercury, the limit established by the EPA and Food and Drug Administration. If these fish had been sold on store shelves, the FDA could order a recall.

State-owned Santee Cooper is seeking a permit from DHEC to move forward on its Pee Dee plant.

Reach Tony Bartelme at 937-5554 or tbartelme@postandcourier.com.







Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by jacksmith on September 17, 2008 at 8:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Boy, what a great job by the "Watchdog." Called EPA and got an "I think." Had to go to New York to get a dermatologist, that's right, an DERMATOLOGIST to comment on Parkinson's disease. I guess Tony couldn't get a Doctor at MUSC or in the southeast for that matter would comment on this landmark piece of investigative journalism.

The dog needs a new leash. This one is connected by titanium to the environmentalists at the Coastal Conservation League.



Posted by jones2 on September 18, 2008 at 9:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

How about a "watchdog" investigation on the links between P&C reporters/editors and the Coastal Conservation League? Tony is in such consistent agreement with the extreme environmentalist agenda ("build absolutely nothing anywhere near anything"), his stories should have a "Paid for by the CCL" disclaimer around them. Perhaps I'm just ignorant and naive, but I always thought the media was supposed to objectively report the facts....




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)