Obama revises national strategyBy PHILIP ELLIOTT
Associated Press
Saturday, September 6, 2008
DILLONVALE, Ohio — So much for the 50-state strategy. Barack Obama, who once pledged to compete in every state, has shifted his thinking. Now he'll pick and choose where to spend time and money. Despite early optimism, Obama's strategists are mapping out an electoral plan similar to Democrat John Kerry's from 2004. Obama still is pushing into traditionally Republican and rural areas, such as this farm region along the Ohio River. But don't look for the Democratic presidential nominee in, say, undeniably GOP Idaho. Obama made a beeline for the Rust Belt when he left the Democratic National Convention last week. With a swing through Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, Obama signaled the importance of this region to his campaign. Kerry won Pennsylvania and Michigan, two states where Obama strategists think their chances are iffy, and lost Ohio by a one-vote-per-precinct margin in 2004. Obama has long looked for a way to win the White House without the 20 electoral votes of Ohio, the prototypical swing state. His top aides, including his campaign manager, once said they could lose the state and still win the election by picking off states that typically support Republicans. No more. The campaign is quietly eyeing a national map similar to the one used in past elections, with a few exceptions. Obama this week dropped advertising in Georgia, a traditionally Republican state that he considered winnable based on increased voter registration among blacks and young people. The updated plan puts Ohio and its neighbors back at the top of the list. And for good reason. Lots of new voters registered for the state's March primary, and Democrats now enjoy a 900,000-person advantage on state voter rolls. Pennsylvania favors Obama by a million registered Democrats. Michigan doesn't register by political party. Democrats who supported Hillary Clinton during the primaries haven't completely swung over to Obama, according to his campaign's internal polling. Aides are optimistic that they will get there before November, aided by events such as Obama's discussion Wednesday about women and the economy in eastern Ohio. |
Article toolsSponsored Links |
|
Notice about comments: Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. |
Comments
This article has 2 comment(s)
Posted by BillytheKid on September 6, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I told my Republican brother in Michigan, his state will of for Obama while me being a Democrat(this is something new for me, I had been voting for Republicans since Reagan) my state will be voting for McCain while I am voting for Obama.
The Republican’s are now selling themselves as the party for change. They had 8 years and just in the last month started talking about change.
It is time for new blood in office everywhere, local, state and federal. The state and local separation is needed here in South Carolina more than anything. We need a new Constitution convention where the people can form how our government should run.
Most Republicans in this state are from the old Dixicrate party, and still sleep there.
Posted by blah_blah_blah on September 8, 2008 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
way to let the terrorists make your decisions, Jane.