Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Council reopens landfill bidding

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, September 3, 2008


A new Charleston County program aimed at boosting the number of minority- and women-owned businesses that land county contracts is struggling to get off the ground.

The county received six bids on a project to build the second section of the Bees Ferry Landfill. It was the first project to include the "Joint Venture" requirement. Bids ranged from $6.15 million to $10.31 million.

The lowest bid that met the Joint Venture requirement was $7.95 million, $1.8 million more than the lowest overall bid.

The Joint Venture program requires that businesses bidding on such contracts must do so in partnership with another business. Owners of the two businesses must be of different races or genders, said Keith Bustraan, the county's chief financial officer. County officials decide on a case-by-case basis which contracts will carry the Joint Venture designation.

Other business

Charleston County Council on Tuesday approved moving into the final design phase on the following projects:

--Glenn McConnell Parkway at Interstate 526, road improvements.

--Bees Ferry Road, widening.

--Johnnie Dodds Boulevard, road improvements.

--Medical University of South Carolina, improvements on area roadways.

Click here to learn more about the projects on Charleston County's Roadwise Web site.

Because the landfill project would be so much more expensive under the Joint Venture program, County Council voted 7-2 Tuesday to drop the requirement and solicit new bids on the project.

Councilmen Teddie Pryor and Henry Darby were opposed to the change.

Bustraan has said the idea behind the Joint Venture program is to force more experienced business owners to include minority or women business owners as partners. When women and minority businesses are included as partners, they will have the opportunity to sharpen their managerial skills, he said. Similar programs have been successful, he said, including one in Atlanta.

Councilman Joe McKeown said before Tuesday's meeting that he was in favor of getting new bids on the contract and looking for the lowest cost for taxpayers. The council "is trying to accomplish a good thing" with the Joint Venture program, he said. But taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for it. "The bids have to be competitive," he said.

Pryor, however, said he thinks the council should have followed through and hired the company that had the lowest bid and met the Joint Venture requirement.

In the past, the county simply awarded contracts to the lowest bidder, he said. And the result was far too few minority- and women-owned businesses landing county contracts.

By deciding to drop the Joint Venture requirement, he said, "not only did we fail the vendors, we failed the system as well."

Reach Diane Knich at 937-5491 or dknich@postandcourier.com.







Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  3 comment(s)

Posted by CharlestonJim on September 3, 2008 at 1:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am a pretty moderate guy. I don't buy into the hype a lot.

About 10 years ago a rather smart friend of mine told me that by 2050 we would be "mining" our landfills of today for materials to use. He made a compelling case about oil in plastics, metals, etc. I could kinda understand the metals arguement at the time. Why do people through away so much metal? That stuff cost $$$ and cost $$$ to make and ship. The rest I kinda blew off as nuts.

After the price increases of the last 2 years, and China and India not going anywhere but up.... I am starting to buy into the 2050 outlook. Have I lost my mind?



Posted by nikkiP on September 3, 2008 at 9:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)

CharlestonJim-

Does seem a little intense, but you never know. They'd have to figure out if the cost of digging it up and searching would be worth the cost of what you might find in there. There are of course the usual safety issues as well.

They made the right decision in going with the lowest bidder. It's not fair to the contractor that works to provide the best service possible to be denied a job because of they way they were born.



Posted by desspec on September 3, 2008 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Joint Venture might be good intentions, but is BAD law.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)