Public input sought on S.C. energy policies
COLUMBIA — The public is asked to weigh in on South Carolina's future energy plan.
For more information
Click here to read the questions for public comment and to learn how to comment.
The State Regulation of Public Utilities Review Committee is looking for written comments to be submitted either by mail or electronically to help legislators and the state's congressional delegation when drafting future energy policies.
Comments sent by mail are due by Nov. 17. Electronic replies are due by Dec. 1.
Any supporting documentation must be properly cited.
The public can provide information on any energy-related matter, but the committee is specifically looking for answers to a list of eight questions.
Electronic comments should be submitted in Microsoft Word with supporting documents in .pdf format. Send replies to coombsn@scsenate.org.
Written comments and supporting documents may be mailed to Heather Anderson, State Regulation of Public Utilities Review Committee, P.O. Box 142, Columbia, SC 29202.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell called for the committee to begin immediate work on addressing South Carolina's energy needs.
"I believe responsibility lies with our General Assembly to conduct research, hold hearings, and act when it comes to policy that will put our state among the winners both as to energy supply and environmental stewardship," McConnell, R-Charleston, said in a statement.
Oral testimony will be accepted at a future committee meeting.
E-mail this story 
Printer-friendly version
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Comments
This article has 1 comment(s)
Posted by zoomru on October 31, 2008 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, Well......WELL !!!!
Someone...sees SMOKE !!!!!
.."Oral testimony will be accepted at a future committee meeting. .."
Just let me know ...WHEN ...and .. WHERE !!!!