Berkeley may put brakes on policy

Berkeley councilman says perk is costly to county

The Post and Courier
Sunday, October 26, 2008


MONCKS CORNER — One Lowcountry county allows a lot more of its employees to drive government-owned cars home after they're finished a day's work.

It's a benefit to several employees of Berkeley County, which allows nearly 95 take-home cars to non-law enforcement employees — more than Dorchester and Charleston counties and the city of Charleston combined.

The county has fewer restrictions than its neighboring counties. Unlike other jurisdictions, Berkeley employees don't have to pay a fee to use the cars or reimburse the county if they live a long distance from where they work.

But some soon might loose their cars. Berkeley County may strip dozens of employees of their take-home cars in an effort to save money.

Councilman Dennis Fish said the county spends more than $100,000 a month on gas, and with the economic downturn, it's time to tighten the belt.

He said he expects council to vote at its next meeting to limit take-home cars to elected officials such as the coroner and supervisor and on-call personnel only. Sheriff's office personnel would not be affected.

"We will change the policy Monday," Fish said.

Berkeley isn't the first to target non-law enforcement take-home cars as a cost-saving measure.

Charleston County recently pared the number of its take-home cars from 30 to eight to decrease fuel costs and reduce the size of the county's fleet. The city of Charleston is considering a plan to charge employees who take city cars home a monthly fee based on their city salary.

City employees earning less than $40,000 would pay $20. Those earning more than $40,000 but less than $60,000 would pay $40, and those earning more than $60,000 would pay $80.

The city estimates those charges would add up to between $40,000 and $50,000 in savings next year.

Dorchester County employees pay a standard $30 per month.

Berkeley County Water and Sanitation Director Colin Martin said he'd like to see council look at similar ways to reduce the take-home-car budget without doing away with take-home cars altogether.

Martin's department has nearly half of Berkeley County's take-home cars, not including seven first-responder vehicles that are used by on-call personnel.

He said the department heads and others who take cars home sometimes are called out after hours and often attend meetings in their vehicles. He also acknowledged it's a perk. Losing it would equal a loss of compensation for his employees.

"Perk is a dirty word when it comes to government, but to keep bright people in public positions, it has to be part of the package," he said.

The take-home policy in Berkeley County has been around for years, but it's been scrutinized more in light of volatile gas prices.

Berkeley County Supervisor Dan Davis said staff has found obvious inequities in the take-home-car system, but they haven't had a chance to overhaul it since he's been in office. He said they just recently discovered that some employees were granted cars in their employment agreements while others were not.

He said he's open to making a change, but nothing is going to be perfect.

"If council has a policy it wants to implement, that's fine," he said.

The current policy states that employees who are authorized to drive vehicles home must not use it for personal purposes except for commuting to work "or running a simple errand on the way to and from work."

Berkeley County officials said they have received numerous complaints from the public about employees driving around the county with their families or eating inside their parked cars with the engine and air conditioning running.

Councilmen have noted that many employees with take-home cars don't live in the county. Some drive back and forth to Moncks Corner every day from as far as West Ashley and St. George.

The city of Charleston uses MapQuest to learn the home-to-office distance of its employees. Anyone who has more than 24 miles to drive round trip is required to pay the city back at 58.5 cents per mile, which is the Internal Revenue Service mileage rate for business travel.

North Charleston employees have to pay 25 cents for every mile they travel after 20 miles.

Davis said Berkeley County has been making an effort to swap more fuel-efficient cars into the county's fleet. He recently traded in his Ford Crown Victoria for a Toyota Prius.

Reach Andy Paras at 745-5891 or aparas@postandcourier.com.Bo Petersen, Dave Munday and David Slade contributed to this report.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  9 comment(s)

Posted by Slick50 on October 26, 2008 at 7:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It's a benefit to several employees of Berkeley County...as if having a full time job is not a benefit. There is absolutely no good reason for anyone to have a taxpayer paid for car. If you are on call, that surely was a clear understanding before you took the job. Suck it up and stop leaching on the county.



Posted by smalltownrumor on October 26, 2008 at 8:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Davis said, "If council has a policy it wants to implement, that's fine." How magnanimous of him to agree to adhere to the mandates of the controlling legal authority of Berkeley County. Too bad he didn't feel the same way about council's direct instructions about the "relabeling" issue concerning Berkeley County Water and Sanitation Authority.



Posted by moonpie on October 26, 2008 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Everyones not on call at once are they? If your on call take the car. We do the same thing where I work if your on call and need a company truck you drive yours to the shop and get the company truck, Not take company vehicles home with you. It's part of the job.
$100000.00 you bet it needs to change. How about the liability of running your family around in the county car? You know car dealerships are struggling and that's the first cost saving measure they took up.



Posted by geekboy on October 26, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"But some soon might loose their cars."

Nice proofreading, P&C.



Posted by martin on October 26, 2008 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

isn't being provided with a car by an employer supposed to be considered income and taxable for income tax purposes? There is a lot of this going on in state government, too.



Posted by sonnyt725 on October 26, 2008 at 4:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What I don't understand is what counties call essential people, and need to be readily available when emergency arises are the ones making the big bucks. During these days that the economy is going kaput, and us regular people are trying make ends meet have to pay high gas prices not to mention paying for the vehicle, as well as its maintenance does not have all these privelege. Again I say only in America but sometimes a little common sense should prevail. Or maybe counties will say " this is part of their pay package". I say to them having a good high paying job without this perks is not good enough? It seems that the good old adage is still true: The rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer.



Posted by sonnyt725 on October 26, 2008 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Just imagine how much money can be saved if all state, county and city government employees is prohibited from using government vehicles for their personal use.



Posted by rebel1 on October 26, 2008 at 5:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

When I was on call I drove to the office when I got called out and then got my work truck and went to work. Why are we paying for ber co empls to have veh?



Posted by flowergirl on October 27, 2008 at 9:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

And don't forget about the employees who ride with the ones that has a county wehicle so that they don't have to pay for gas. The one with the county car has to drive out of the way to pick up the other one. Ridiculous.




Sponsored Links