Ash landfill causes concern
Some argue new SCE&G waste site poses threat to Congaree National Park
The Post and Courier
Heath Hill, a farmer near Wateree, says a new ash landfill next to South Carolina Electric & Gas power station will ruin his land's value and threaten drinking water supplies. He's challenging SCE&G in court.
WATEREE — Heath Hill farms cotton, corn and other vegetables on several thousand acres next to SCE&G's Wateree plant. He has thinning gray hair, a round, Carroll O'Conner-esque face, and he knows every ditch and culvert for miles around.
"I've lived here all my life, and I don't want to see the community destroyed," he said one bright afternoon while driving toward the new South Carolina Electric & Gas ash landfill, now under construction. "There's low-income people all around here, and they can't afford to fight, or don't know what to do," he said.
Hill isn't a shy man, and he's not afraid to take on one of South Carolina's largest companies. He has filed three legal actions and spent $50,000 out of his pocket to fight SCE&G's new ash landfill.
Hill says the new ash landfill will ruin the area's drinking water and lower property values. He said the company's environmental record at the plant is spotty. Ash in ponds next to the plant have contaminated groundwater next to the river with arsenic many times the federal drinking water limit.
Hill isn't the only one concerned about the landfill and SCE&G's ash operations. The power plant is just a few miles upstream from the Congaree National Park.
"When you have an ash pond that's right on the Wateree River, whose berms are barely above the historic flood stage, and that leaks arsenic into the groundwater, I'd say that's a threat to the park," said John Grego, a statistics professor at the University of South Carolina and president of Friends of the Congaree.
For years, SCE&G dumped ash from its plant in two ponds next to the Wateree River.
The ponds are enclosed by berms made of dense soil. On the edge of these berms, the utility drilled wells to monitor whether contamination from the landfill was getting into groundwater and possibly the Wateree River.
Over time, several wells, including some just steps away from the river, consistently yielded water samples with high levels of arsenic, including one well with arsenic 200 to 400 times the federal limit.
Jean-Claude Younan, SCE&G's environmental chief, says soils between the wells and the river trap some of the arsenic. And if any arsenic makes its way into the water, the river itself takes care of the problem.
"As soon as it (the arsenic) hits the river, it's completely diluted and gone, and has no effect on the environment," he said.
Now, the utility is building a large new landfill to replace the ponds. At the same time, the utility is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to install new air scrubbers. The scrubbers will remove mercury and other toxic chemicals before they leave the plant's stacks, but these poisons could end up in the plant's ash. Residents worry this ash will contaminate their drinking water.
"What difference does it make if you take it out of the air and put it in the ground and water?" said Robb Brown, one of Hill's attorneys.
"I'd like it to just disappear," said Carolyn Williams-Sumter, who lives three hundred yards from the new landfill.
So would Hill.
One afternoon, he watched earth-moving machines digging in the new landfill, an area that likely once housed slave homes, a recent report found. Hill's property is all around the plant, and he remembered a time SCE&G asked him if his property was for sale.
"I said, no, it's not for sale. It's for my children."

Comments
scfirefly (anonymous) says...
DHEC enforces THE LAW. It's not their job to please every paranoid ignorant Kook out there. Please specify exactly what law is being broken?
October 26, 2008 at 3:30 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
phred (anonymous) says...
spankerbuns, you don't know what you are talking about. You must be Tony's no. 1 fan.
He got the story wrong. It's a landfill for scrubber waste.
Enviros want the air cleaned up, so SCANA is putting in a scrubber. They need somewhere to put the byproduct, so they need a landfill. They are FOLLOWING THE LAW BUILDING A LANDFILL.
Want to know what the scrubber byproduct is? Gypsum, the main component in wallboard. This is a benign solid that is also used as a soil conditioner.
What this sounds like to me is that this fellow, although he lived by the power plant "his whole life" he has suddenly decided he doesn't want a landfill of benign material nearby.
Hmm. Sounds like he is looking for a big payoff from SCANA. I am sure in his mind, that $50k is a small down payment for a big return he is hoping for.
Don't give in SCANA! Save me on my power bills!
October 26, 2008 at 10:27 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
phred (anonymous) says...
Again, spankerbuns, you are wrong.
"...other pollutants magically disappear after they are scrubbed..."
No, but, chemistry is your friend. First, they are very, very trace amounts of metals in the gypsum. Gypsum is a stable, benign product. If you study this any at all, the metals stay bound to the material. Only under extreme conditions would they be released (very low pH). This has be studied at length.
"If they want this coal plant"
The Wateree plant has been there since the 1970's.
New landfills have to have proper monitoring and must be constructed to Subtitle D standards (liners and leachate collection systems). It is the BEST technology. DHEC has recently updated the landfill regs, BTW.
You just cannot believe some folks are motivated by money and resort to exhorting if from companies? Happens all the time - and the paper just loves these guys.
October 26, 2008 at 11:26 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.