Dist. 115 rivals spar over gifts

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, October 22, 2008


Republican incumbent state Rep. Wallace Scarborough and Democratic challenger Anne Peterson Hutto are sparring over $7,000 Scarborough's campaign received from New York real estate investor and school choice advocate Howard Rich.

photo

Wallace Scarborough

photo

Anne Peterson Hutto

Scarborough has received at least seven separate $1,000 donations from Rich's groups that had the same 73 Spring St. address in New York.

"This is just another example of bad judgment by Wallace Scarborough," Hutto said. "People on James Island and Folly Beach don't want their representative making deals with characters like Howard Rich that would hurt our public and charter schools."

Scarborough said these are the same groups that support Gov. Mark Sanford, whom he also supports. "They have the same kind of philosophy as the governor. Because I've supported them, they've given me money," he said. "She's gotten a ton of money from trial lawyers. ... That's because they agree with her philosophy."

Both have raised almost $100,000 for their District 115 contest, one of the Lowcountry's most hotly contested state House races. The district includes most of James Island and Folly Beach.

Scarborough has almost three times as much cash on hand, $65,239 versus $19,021 for Hutto, heading into the home stretch. The scrutiny about Scarborough's donations from Rich comes as a new Web site — fighthowardrich.org — aims to draw new public scrutiny to Rich's agenda and how much he has given to South Carolina candidates.

Candidate profiles

Incumbent facing newcomer, published 9/30/2008

Though the Web site was created by the South Carolina New Democrats, its figures show Lowcountry Democrats have been as willing to accept Rich's largesse as Republicans. Democratic candidates Wendell Gilliard and incumbent state Sen. Robert Ford have received $5,000 and $8,000, respectively, while state Rep. Heyward Hutson, who lost his District 94 primary battle, accepted $7,000, according to the Web site. It does not list the amount given to Scarborough, whose donations turned up on a State Ethics Commission filing earlier this week.

The Web site calls Rich "an extremely wealthy New York real estate developer and libertarian political activist" trying to convince the South Carolina Legislature to divert public money to private schools through school vouchers and tax credits, an idea that Sanford also has championed.

New Democrats president Phil Noble, a Charleston businessman, said, "What Rich is doing is just plain wrong and we want to fight him by exposing him and the South Carolina politicians that take his 'shady money.' Rich's education voucher scheme is nothing less than a radical social experiment that endangers our children by undermining our education system."

Hutto vowed to "fight for our public and charter schools, and I'll put people over special interests groups."

Scarborough said that while he supports school choice, he is not for vouchers. "There's been no larger advocate for the charter school system than Wallace Scarborough," he said. "When Democrats tried to defeat and kills James Island Charter High School, I stood up on the House floor and defeated the Democrats."

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or at rbehre@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

JIgrad (anonymous) says...

So, now Wallace is in cahoots with Howard Rich? Howard Rich isn't for school choice; he's for destroying the state's public schools.

What has happened to Wallace? While I enjoy watching the soap-opera that is Wallace Scarborough, I really wish he wasn't our guy in the legislature. Perhaps a reality show might fit him better.

October 22, 2008 at 1:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

mkris (anonymous) says...

How's his girlfriend in Beaufort?

October 22, 2008 at 10:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

blaze (anonymous) says...

Wally neglects to say that close to 10% of his donations have come from claimant's lawyers.

Without permission, his people put his sign up in my family's yard simply because they had a Hutto sign out there.

October 22, 2008 at 12:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

barrister (anonymous) says...

Alright now, if we are gonna pick on Wallace for accepting Howard Rich money, let's also point out that Mike Rose has accepted thousands of Rich dollars as well. At least Wallace doesn't run around sucking up to the conservationists, while simultaneously accepting money from a New York developer!

October 22, 2008 at 1:52 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Jim_Isle (anonymous) says...

Has anyone seen the list of donors for Hutto's campaign? Just wondered. I'd rather have Wallace, who understands the way the legislature works, than someone who is vaguely opposed to development on James Island. What say does a state rep have on that? That's up to the Town, the city, and the county. I just know that anytime any group I know has a problem (from the Charter School to Friends of McLeod) Wallace finds the info and helps to solve it.

October 22, 2008 at 4:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

workingmom (anonymous) says...

Mr. Scarborough seems to talk out of both sides of his mouth. According to him, Ms. Peterson-Hutto is wrong for taking money from "trial lawyers" as if trial lawyers are evil. Trial lawyers are just lawyers who represent people with last names that aren't INC., etc.

But, the "businessmen" listed on Mr. Scarborough's donor list are trial lawyers. Apparently, Mr. S has no problem with accepting money from these guys. His only problem is BEING HONEST with the voters about how these "businessmen" earn a living.

How about a little honesty? Ms. Peterson-Hutto is honest about where her contributions are coming from and what the people who are making the contributions do for a living.

In addition to his businessmen (read: trial lawyer) friends, Mr. Scarborough is accepting money from some special interest DEVELOPER from NEW YORK CITY. Considering the concerns about development on JI, this donor alone worries me. I'm surprised he's not giving Ms. Peterson-Hutto a hard time for having gone to law school in NYC!

Finally, I don't understand Scarborough's "common sense" platform. Does shooting at SCE&G workers because you think they're private investigators trying to confirm your affair with a co-legislator demonstrate common sense?? I think not. At least he's not running on a family values platform, too. That'd be more lies and spin than this working mom could handle!

October 22, 2008 at 11:52 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.